End Users' and Other Stakeholders' Needs and Requirements in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Mixed Methods Study.

ICT Parkinson disease chronic diseases dementia health care technologies information and communication technology integrated care mobile phone neurodegenerative user-centered design

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 02 05 2022
accepted: 17 08 2022
revised: 18 07 2022
entrez: 30 11 2022
pubmed: 1 12 2022
medline: 1 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

With what has been known as the "triple-win effect", introducing information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases is beneficial in delaying the need for institutional care, reducing the associated health care costs, reducing the caregiving burden, and improving individuals' quality of life. Nevertheless, the mismatch between the users' expectations and their actual needs remains one of the main challenges that can reduce the usability of technology solutions. Therefore, the European project Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People (PROCare4Life), which aimed to develop an ICT-based platform for all parties involved in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases, adopted a user-centered design approach, where all users are involved from the inception and throughout the platform development and implementation to integrate their needs and requirements in the proposed platform. This paper presents the results of a study on the needs and requirements of the potential end users (older people with neurodegenerative diseases, caregivers, and health care professionals) and other key stakeholders in the development of the PROCare4Life platform. A mixed qualitative and quantitative study design was used, including 2 web-based surveys, 40 interviews, and 4 workshops. The study was conducted between April and September 2020 in 5 European countries: Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain. Both data types were analyzed separately and then merged and interpreted, with greater priority placed on qualitative research. A total of 217 participants were recruited; 157 (72.4%) of them completed the web-based surveys (n=85, 54.1% patients and n=72, 45.9% caregivers), and 60 (27.6%) individuals participated in the qualitative research (20/60, 33% health care professionals; 5/60, 8% patients; 5/60, 8% caregivers; and 30/60, 50% key stakeholders). We identified 3 main themes (T): (T1) experiences associated with illness, (T2) thoughts about the platform technology, and (T3) desired properties. Alerts for adverse events, communication tools, reminders, and monitoring are constantly needed functionalities, whereas ease of use, personalization, and user-friendliness are foreseen as necessary features. This paper identified the key personal, social, and health factors that influence the daily lives of the potential end users and reflected on their needs and expectations regarding the design of the proposed PROCare4Life platform. The collected data were useful for the development of the PROCare4Life platform. Although the combination and collection of features for diverse user groups are typical for integrated care platforms, it results in exponential complexity for designers, developers, and users. Contradicting opinions and several concerns in this study demonstrate that an ICT-integrated care platform should not promise too much for too many. Instead, selection, focus, and, sometimes, restriction to essentials are necessary. Users and other stakeholders should be involved in these decisions. RR2-10.2196/22463.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
With what has been known as the "triple-win effect", introducing information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases is beneficial in delaying the need for institutional care, reducing the associated health care costs, reducing the caregiving burden, and improving individuals' quality of life. Nevertheless, the mismatch between the users' expectations and their actual needs remains one of the main challenges that can reduce the usability of technology solutions. Therefore, the European project Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People (PROCare4Life), which aimed to develop an ICT-based platform for all parties involved in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases, adopted a user-centered design approach, where all users are involved from the inception and throughout the platform development and implementation to integrate their needs and requirements in the proposed platform.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This paper presents the results of a study on the needs and requirements of the potential end users (older people with neurodegenerative diseases, caregivers, and health care professionals) and other key stakeholders in the development of the PROCare4Life platform.
METHODS METHODS
A mixed qualitative and quantitative study design was used, including 2 web-based surveys, 40 interviews, and 4 workshops. The study was conducted between April and September 2020 in 5 European countries: Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain. Both data types were analyzed separately and then merged and interpreted, with greater priority placed on qualitative research.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 217 participants were recruited; 157 (72.4%) of them completed the web-based surveys (n=85, 54.1% patients and n=72, 45.9% caregivers), and 60 (27.6%) individuals participated in the qualitative research (20/60, 33% health care professionals; 5/60, 8% patients; 5/60, 8% caregivers; and 30/60, 50% key stakeholders). We identified 3 main themes (T): (T1) experiences associated with illness, (T2) thoughts about the platform technology, and (T3) desired properties. Alerts for adverse events, communication tools, reminders, and monitoring are constantly needed functionalities, whereas ease of use, personalization, and user-friendliness are foreseen as necessary features.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This paper identified the key personal, social, and health factors that influence the daily lives of the potential end users and reflected on their needs and expectations regarding the design of the proposed PROCare4Life platform. The collected data were useful for the development of the PROCare4Life platform. Although the combination and collection of features for diverse user groups are typical for integrated care platforms, it results in exponential complexity for designers, developers, and users. Contradicting opinions and several concerns in this study demonstrate that an ICT-integrated care platform should not promise too much for too many. Instead, selection, focus, and, sometimes, restriction to essentials are necessary. Users and other stakeholders should be involved in these decisions.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
RR2-10.2196/22463.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36449340
pii: v6i11e39199
doi: 10.2196/39199
pmc: PMC9752454
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e39199

Informations de copyright

©Mona Ahmed, Mayca Marín, Daniella How, Elda Judica, Peppino Tropea, Ellen Bentlage, Joaquim J Ferreira, Raquel Bouça-Machado, Michael Brach. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 30.11.2022.

Références

BMC Geriatr. 2016 Mar 07;16:61
pubmed: 26951709
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 May 28;7(2):
pubmed: 31141999
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 02;9(2):
pubmed: 33540510
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(2):283-97
pubmed: 25333304
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):9-10
pubmed: 23165075
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015 Jun;16(3-4):202-8
pubmed: 25646865
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Jul;28(6):412-422
pubmed: 32715866
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 26;13(1):87
pubmed: 29940992
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019 Dec 02;6:2055668319869517
pubmed: 31832230
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Feb 22;16(2):266
pubmed: 26907296
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 28;18(1):e18
pubmed: 26822073
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;22(10):957-62
pubmed: 17299807
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):
pubmed: 35010408
JMIR Aging. 2019 Apr 30;2(1):e12192
pubmed: 31518262
Health Informatics J. 2020 Dec;26(4):3215-3230
pubmed: 31969045
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jan 16;4(1):e1
pubmed: 28582262
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jul 21;17(4):2
pubmed: 28970760
Mov Disord. 2016 Sep;31(9):1272-82
pubmed: 27125836
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 14;11:623933
pubmed: 33519704
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):483-491
pubmed: 29433981
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Oct;21(5):949-65
pubmed: 19602305
Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 13;11(2):
pubmed: 33668641
Can J Occup Ther. 2012 Dec;79(5):309-19
pubmed: 23539776
Scand J Occup Ther. 2018 Mar;25(2):79-87
pubmed: 28276963
Int J Telemed Appl. 2013;2013:461829
pubmed: 23690763
Ageing Res Rev. 2007 Oct;6(3):223-46
pubmed: 17869590
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Aug;15(8):663-7
pubmed: 24578832
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 01;17(11):
pubmed: 29104256
Eur J Ageing. 2016;13:271-279
pubmed: 27610055
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 12;10(1):e22463
pubmed: 33433394
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 May;26(5):769-79
pubmed: 24507571
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(6):889-911
pubmed: 26511768
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jul;9(4):353-8
pubmed: 23855387
Neurology. 2004 Dec 28;63(12):2348-53
pubmed: 15623698
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 May 7;124(17):651-3
pubmed: 15882512
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):749-755
pubmed: 29147055
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 01;29(5):612-624
pubmed: 28992156
J Med Syst. 2020 May 25;44(7):120
pubmed: 32451740
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):419-44
pubmed: 23957379
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 04;13:43
pubmed: 23379786
Disabil Rehabil. 1998 Apr;20(4):142-50
pubmed: 9571381

Auteurs

Mona Ahmed (M)

Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany.

Mayca Marín (M)

Asociación Parkinson Madrid (APM), Madrid, Spain.

Daniella How (D)

Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany.

Elda Judica (E)

Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Peppino Tropea (P)

Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Ellen Bentlage (E)

Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany.

Joaquim J Ferreira (J)

Campus Neurológico Sénior (CNS), Torres Vedras, Portugal.

Raquel Bouça-Machado (R)

Campus Neurológico Sénior (CNS), Torres Vedras, Portugal.

Michael Brach (M)

Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Münster University, Münster, Germany.

Classifications MeSH