A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
05
04
2022
accepted:
19
10
2022
pubmed:
1
12
2022
medline:
17
12
2022
entrez:
30
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tidal disruption events (TDEs) are bursts of electromagnetic energy that are released when supermassive black holes at the centres of galaxies violently disrupt a star that passes too close
Identifiants
pubmed: 36450988
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
430-434Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : PHY-2010970
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : OAC-2117997
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : 1829740
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Rees, M. J. Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 10
doi: 10.1038/333523a0
Bloom, J. S. et al. A possible relativistic jetted outburst from a massive black hole fed by a tidally disrupted star. Science 333, 203–206 (2011).
doi: 10.1126/science.1207150
Burrows, D. N. et al. Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole. Nature 476, 421–424 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nature10374
Levan, A. J. et al. An extremely luminous panchromatic outburst from the nucleus of a distant galaxy. Science 333, 199–202 (2011).
doi: 10.1126/science.1207143
Zauderer, B. A. et al. Birth of a relativistic outflow in the unusual γ-ray transient Swift J164449.3+573451. Nature 476, 425–428 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nature10366
Cenko, S. B. et al. Swift J2058.4+0516: discovery of a possible second relativistic tidal disruption flare? Astrophys. J. 753, 77 (2012).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/77
Brown, G. C. et al. Swift J1112.2-8238: a candidate relativistic tidal disruption flare. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 4297–4306 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1520
Pasham, D. R. et al. A multiwavelength study of the relativistic tidal disruption candidate Swift J2058.4+0516 at late times. Astrophys. J. 805, 68 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/68
Yuan, Q., Wang, Q. D., Lei, W.-H., Gao, H. & Zhang, B. Catching jetted tidal disruption events early in millimetre. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3375–3384 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1543
Graham, M. J. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: science objectives. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 078001 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c
Sun, H., Zhang, B. & Li, Z. Extragalactic high-energy transients: event rate densities and luminosity functions. Astrophys. J. 812, 33 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/33
Andreoni, I. et al. Fast-transient searches in real time with ZTFReST: identification of three optically discovered gamma-ray burst afterglows and new constraints on the kilonova rate. Astrophys. J. 918, 63 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0bc7
Pasham, D., Gendreau, K., Arzoumanian, Z. & Cenko, B. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: NICER X-ray detection. GCN Circ. 31601, 1 (2022).
Perley, D. A. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: VLA radio detection. GCN Circ. 31592, 1 (2022).
Perley, D. A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Petitpas, G. & Keating, G. ZTF22aaajecb/AT2022cmc: submillimeter array detection. GCN Circ. 31627, 1 (2022).
Planck Collaboration. Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); erratum 652, C4 (2021).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
Tanvir, N. R. et al. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: VLT/X-shooter redshift. GCN Circ. 31602, 1 (2022).
Gal-Yam, A. Observational and physical classification of supernovae. In Handbook of Supernovae (eds. Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P.) 195–237 (Springer, 2017).
Lu, W. & Bonnerot, C. Self-intersection of the fallback stream in tidal disruption events. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 686–707 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3405
Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433–456 (1977).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/179.3.433
Pasham, D. et al. High-cadence NICER X-ray observations of AT2022cmc/ZTF22aaajecpc: flux variability and spectral evolution suggest it could be a relativistic tidal disruption event. Astron. Telegr. 15232, 1 (2022).
Yao, Y., Pasham, D. R. & Gendreau, K. C. NuSTAR observation of AT2022cmc, and joint spectral fitting with NICER. Astron. Telegr. 15230, 1 (2022).
Tchekhovskoy, A., Metzger, B. D., Giannios, D. & Kelley, L. Z. Swift J1644+57 gone MAD: the case for dynamically important magnetic flux threading the black hole in a jetted tidal disruption event. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 2744–2760 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2085
Kumar, P. & Zhang, B. The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets. Phys. Reports 561, 1–109 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008
Dai, L., McKinney, J. C., Roth, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E. & Miller, M. C. A unified model for tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. Lett. 859, L20 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab429
Bonnerot, C., Lu, W. & Hopkins, P. F. First light from tidal disruption events. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504, 4885–4905 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab398
Mattila, S. et al. A dust-enshrouded tidal disruption event with a resolved radio jet in a galaxy merger. Science 361, 482–485 (2018).
doi: 10.1126/science.aao4669
Stone, N. C. et al. Rates of stellar tidal disruption. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 35 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00651-4
De Colle, F. & Lu, W. Jets from tidal disruption events. New Astron. Rev. 89, 101538 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2020.101538
Alexander, K. D., van Velzen, S., Horesh, A. & Zauderer, B. A. Radio properties of tidal disruption events. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 81 (2020).
Hammerstein, E. et al. The final season reimagined: 30 tidal disruption events from the ZTF-I Survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01461 (2022).
Aasi, J. et al. Advanced LIGO. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001
Acernese, F. et al. Advanced Virgo. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001
Aartsen, M. et al. The IceCube neutrino observatory: instrumentation and online systems. J. Instrum. 12, P03012–P03012 (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/P03012
Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: system overview, performance, and first results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 018002 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe
Ivezić, Ž. et al. LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products. Astrophys. J. 873, 111 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c
Andreoni, I. & Coughlin, M. growth-astro/ztfrest: ztfrest. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6827348 (2022).
Yao, Y. et al. ZTF early observations of type Ia supernovae. I. Properties of the 2018 sample. Astrophys. J. 886, 152 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4cf5
Andreoni, I. ZTF Transient Discovery Report for 2022-02-14. Report No. 2022-397 (Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2022); https://wis-tns.org/object/2022cmc/discovery-cert
Metzger, B. D. Kilonovae. Living Rev. Relativ. 23, 1 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0
Coulter, D. A. et al. Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source. Science 358, 1556–1558 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aap9811
Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
Prentice, S. J. et al. The Cow: discovery of a luminous, hot, and rapidly evolving transient. Astrophys. J. Lett. 865, L3 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aadd90
Perley, D. A. et al. The fast, luminous ultraviolet transient AT2018cow: extreme supernova, or disruption of a star by an intermediate-mass black hole? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 1031–1049 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3420
Margutti, R. et al. An embedded X-ray source shines through the aspherical AT2018cow: revealing the inner workings of the most luminous fast-evolving optical transients. Astrophys. J. 872, 18 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa01
Coppejans, D. L. et al. A mildly relativistic outflow from the energetic, fast-rising blue optical transient CSS161010 in a dwarf galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 895, L23 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8cc7
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. The Koala: a fast blue optical transient with luminous radio emission from a starburst dwarf galaxy at z = 0.27. Astrophys. J. 895, 49 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bcf
Perley, D. A. et al. Real-time discovery of AT2020xnd: a fast, luminous ultraviolet transient with minimal radioactive ejecta. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 5138–5147 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2785
Yao, Y. et al. The X-ray and radio loud fast blue optical transient AT2020mrf: implications for an emerging class of engine-driven massive star explosions. Astrophys. J. 934, 104 (2022).
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. AT2018cow: a luminous millimeter transient. Astrophys. J. 871, 73 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf473
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. Luminous millimeter, radio, and X-ray emission from ZTF 20acigmel (AT 2020xnd). Astrophys. J. 932, 116 (2022).
Quataert, E. & Kasen, D. Swift 1644+57: the longest gamma-ray burst? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, L1–L5 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01151.x
Sheth, K. et al. Millimeter observations of GRB 030329: continued evidence for a two-component jet. Astrophys. J. 595, L33–L36 (2003).
doi: 10.1086/378933
Laskar, T. et al. First ALMA light curve constrains refreshed reverse shocks and jet magnetization in GRB 161219B. Astrophys. J. 862, 94 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacbcc
Laskar, T. et al. A reverse shock in GRB 181201A. Astrophys. J. 884, 121 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40ce
Perley, D. A. et al. The afterglow of GRB 130427A from 1 to 10
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/37
de Ugarte Postigo, A. et al. Pre-ALMA observations of GRBs in the mm/submm range. Astron. Astrophys. 538, A44 (2012).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117848
Kulkarni, S. R. et al. Radio emission from the unusual supernova 1998bw and its association with the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998. Nature 395, 663–669 (1998).
doi: 10.1038/27139
Perley, D. A., Schulze, S. & de Ugarte Postigo, A. GRB 171205A: ALMA observations. GCN Circ. 22252, 1 (2017).
Weiler, K. W. et al. Long-term radio monitoring of SN 1993J. Astrophys. J. 671, 1959–1980 (2007).
doi: 10.1086/523258
Maeda, K. et al. The final months of massive star evolution from the circumstellar environment around SN Ic 2020oi. Astrophys. J. 918, 34 (2021).
Horesh, A. et al. An early and comprehensive millimetre and centimetre wave and X-ray study of SN 2011dh: a non-equipartition blast wave expanding into a massive stellar wind. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 1258–1267 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1645
Corsi, A. et al. A multi-wavelength investigation of the radio-loud supernova PTF11qcj and its circumstellar environment. Astrophys. J. 782, 42 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/42
Soderberg, A. M. et al. A relativistic type Ibc supernova without a detected γ-ray burst. Nature 463, 513–515 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature08714
Kann, D. A., Klose, S. & Zeh, A. Signatures of extragalactic dust in pre-Swift GRB afterglows. Astrophys. J. 641, 993–1009 (2006).
doi: 10.1086/500652
Kann, D. A. et al. The afterglows of Swift-era gamma-ray bursts. I. Comparing pre-Swift and Swift-era long/soft (type II) GRB optical afterglows. Astrophys. J. 720, 1513–1558 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1513
Kann, D. A. et al. The afterglows of Swift-era gamma-ray bursts. II. Type I GRB versus type II GRB optical afterglows. Astrophys. J. 734, 96 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/96
Strubbe, L. E. & Quataert, E. Optical flares from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 2070–2084 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x
Shiokawa, H., Krolik, J. H., Cheng, R. M., Piran, T. & Noble, S. C. General relativistic hydrodynamic simulation of accretion flow from a stellar tidal disruption. Astrophys. J. 804, 85 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/85
Hayasaki, K., Stone, N. & Loeb, A. Circularization of tidally disrupted stars around spinning supermassive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3760–3780 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1387
Bonnerot, C., Rossi, E. M., Lodato, G. & Price, D. J. Disc formation from tidal disruptions of stars on eccentric orbits by Schwarzschild black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 2253–2266 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2411
Metzger, B. D. & Stone, N. C. A bright year for tidal disruptions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 948–966 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1394
Metzger, B. D., Giannios, D. & Mimica, P. Afterglow model for the radio emission from the jetted tidal disruption candidate Swift J1644+57. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 420, 3528–3537 (2012).
Tchekhovskoy, A., Narayan, R. & McKinney, J. C. Black hole spin and the radio loud/quiet dichotomy of active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 711, 50–63 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/50
Law-Smith, J. A. P., Coulter, D. A., Guillochon, J., Mockler, B. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. Stellar tidal disruption events with abundances and realistic structures (STARS): library of fallback rates. Astrophys. J. 905, 141 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc489
Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M. & Davis, S. W. Super-Eddington accretion disks around supermassive black holes. Astrophys. J. 880, 67 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff
de Ugarte Postigo, A. et al. The distribution of equivalent widths in long GRB afterglow spectra. Astron. Astrophys. 548, A11 (2012).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219894
Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. R. & Djorgovski, S. G. The observed offset distribution of gamma-ray bursts from their host galaxies: a robust clue to the nature of the Progenitors. Astron. J. 123, 1111–1148 (2002).
doi: 10.1086/338893
Blanchard, P. K., Berger, E. & Fong, W.-F. The offset and host light distributions of long gamma-ray bursts: a new view from HST observations of Swift bursts. Astrophys. J. 817, 144 (2016).
doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/144
Burrows, D. N. et al. The Swift X-Ray Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 165–195 (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2
Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C. & Speagle, J. S. Stellar population inference with Prospector. Astrophys. J. Supp. Ser. 254, 22 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67
Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E. & White, M. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the initial mass function to the derived physical properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 699, 486–506 (2009).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486
Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J. & Johnson, B. python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12157 (2014).
Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. J., Conroy, C. & Johnson, B. D. Nebular continuum and line emission in stellar population synthesis models. Astrophys. J. 840, 44 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66
Chabrier, G. Galactic stellar and substellar initial mass function. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 115, 763–795 (2003).
doi: 10.1086/376392
Calzetti, D. et al. The dust content and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 533, 682–695 (2000).
doi: 10.1086/308692
Schulze, S. et al. The Palomar Transient Factory Core-collapse Supernova Host-galaxy Sample. I. Host-galaxy distribution functions and environment dependence of core-collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 255, 29 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abff5e
McConnell, N. J. & Ma, C.-P. Revisiting the scaling relations of black hole masses and host galaxy properties. Astrophys. J. 764, 184 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184
Kesden, M. Tidal-disruption rate of stars by spinning supermassive black holes. Phys. Rev. D 85, 024037 (2012).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024037
Cummings, J. R. et al. GRB 110328A: Swift detection of a burst. GCN Circ. 11823, 1 (2011).
Benson, B. A. et al. SPT-3G: a next-generation cosmic microwave background polarization experiment on the South Pole telescope. In Proc. SPIE 9153: Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VII (eds Holland, W. S. & Zmuidzinas, J.) 91531P (SPIE, 2014).
Abazajian, K. et al. CMB-S4 science case, reference design, and project plan. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04473 (2019).
Guns, S. et al. Detection of galactic and extragalactic millimeter-wavelength transient sources with SPT-3G. Astrophys. J. 916, 98 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac06a3
Eftekhari, T. et al. Extragalactic millimeter transients in the era of next-generation CMB surveys. Astrophys. J. 935, 16 (2022).
Feindt, U. et al. simsurvey: estimating transient discovery rates for the Zwicky Transient Facility. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2019, 005 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/005
Andreoni, I. et al. Constraining the kilonova rate with Zwicky Transient Facility searches independent of gravitational wave and short gamma-ray burst triggers. Astrophys. J. 904, 155 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbf4c
Buchner, J. et al. X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 564, A125 (2014).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. Multinest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601–1614 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x
Feroz, F. & Hobson, M. P. Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384, 449 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x
Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: surveys and scheduler. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 068003 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0c2a
Dekany, R. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: observing system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 132, 038001 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2
Masci, F. J. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: data processing, products, and archive. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 018003 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac
Steele, I. A. et al. The Liverpool Telescope: performance and first results. In Proc. SPIE 5489: Ground-based Telescopes (ed. Oschmann, J. M. Jr.) 679-692 (SPIE, 2004).
Perley, R. A., Chandler, C. J., Butler, B. J. & Wrobel, J. M. The Expanded Very Large Array: a new telescope for new science. Astrophys. J. Lett. 739, L1 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1
Holland, W. S. et al. SCUBA-2: the 10 000 pixel bolometer camera on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 2513–2533 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts612
Currie, M. J. et al. Starlink Software in 2013. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII (eds Manset, N. & Forshay, P.) 391–394 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2014).
Chapin, E. L. et al. SCUBA-2: iterative map-making with the Sub-Millimetre User Reduction Facility. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 2545–2573 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt052
Mairs, S. et al. A decade of SCUBA-2: a comprehensive guide to calibrating 450 μm and 850 μm continuum data at the JCMT. Astron. J. 162, 191 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac18bf
Smith, I. A., Perley, D. A. & Tanvir, N. R. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: JCMT SCUBA-2 sub-mm observations. GCN Circ. 31654 (2022).
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. CASA architecture and applications. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI (eds Shaw, R. A. et al.) 127 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2007).
Maity, B. & Chandra, P. 1000 days of the lowest-frequency emission from the low-luminosity GRB 171205A. Astrophys. J. 907, 60 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd2be
McCully, C. & Tewes, M. Astro-SCRAPPY: Speedy Cosmic Ray Annihilation Package in Python. Github https://github.com/astropy/astroscrappy (2019).
Bertin, E. SWarp: resampling and co-adding FITS images together. Astrophys. Source Code Library http://ascl.net/1010.068 (2010).
Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560 (2016).
Flaugher, B. et al. The Dark Energy Camera. Astron. J. 150, 150 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150
Valdes, F., Gruendl, R. & DES Project. The DECam Community Pipeline. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII (eds Manset, N. & Forshay, P.) 379–382 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2014).
Rest, A. et al. Cosmological constraints from measurements of type Ia supernovae discovered during the first 1.5 yr of the Pan-STARRS1 Survey. Astrophys. J. 795, 44 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/44
Xavier Prochaska, J. et al. pypeit/Pypeit: release 1.0.0. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/3743493 (2020).
Cenko, S. B. et al. The Automated Palomar 60 Inch Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 118, 1396–1406 (2006).
doi: 10.1086/508366
Blagorodnova, N. et al. The SED Machine: a robotic spectrograph for fast transient classification. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 130, 035003 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa53f
Rigault, M. et al. Fully automated integral field spectrograph pipeline for the SEDMachine: pysedm. Astron. Astrophys. 627, A115 (2019).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935344
Fremling, C. et al. PTF12os and iPTF13bvn. Astron. Astrophys. 593, A68 (2016).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628275
Ahn, C. P. et al. The Tenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: first spectroscopic data from the SDSS-III Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 211, 17 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/17
Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: a high-cadence all-sky survey system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 130, 064505 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf
Smith, K. W. et al. Design and operation of the ATLAS transient science server. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 132, 085002 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab936e
Vernet, J. et al. X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 536, A105 (2011).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752
Modigliani, A. et al. The X-shooter pipeline. In Proc. SPIE 7737: Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III (eds Silva, D. R. et al.) 773728 (SPIE, 2010).
Selsing, J. et al. The X-shooter GRB afterglow legacy sample (XS-GRB). Astron. Astrophys. 623, A92 (2019).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832835
Garzón, F. et al. EMIR: the GTC NIR multi-object imager-spectrograph. In Proc. SPIE 6269: Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy (eds McLean, I. S. & Iye, M.) 626918 (SPIE, 2006).
Kann, D. A. et al. ZTF22aaajecp/AT 2022cmc: CAHA 2.2m/CAFOS detection, luminous transient. GCN Circ. 31626, 1 (2022).
Prochaska, J. et al. PypeIt: the Python spectroscopic data reduction pipeline. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2308 (2020).
doi: 10.21105/joss.02308
Lundquist, M. J., Alvarez, C. A. & O’Meara, J. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: Keck DEIMOS redshift. GCN Circ. 31612, 1 (2022).
Perley, D. A. Fully automated reduction of longslit spectroscopy with the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer at the Keck Observatory. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 084503 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab215d
Labrie, K., Cardenes, R., Anderson, K., Simpson, C. & Turner, J. E. H. DRAGONS: one pipeline to rule them all. In Proc. SPIE 522: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII (eds Ballester, P. et al.) 583–586 (SPIE, 2020).
Ahumada, T. et al. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: GMOS-N spectroscopy. GCN Circ. 31595, 1 (2022).
Roming, P. W. A. et al. The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 95–142 (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4
Cash, W. Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. Astrophys. J. 228, 939–947 (1979).
doi: 10.1086/156922
Gendreau, K. C. et al. The Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER): design and development. In Proc. SPIE 9905: Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray (eds den Herder, J.-W. A. et al.) 99051H (SPIE, 2016).
Pasham, D. R. et al. The birth of a relativistic jet following the disruption of a star by a cosmological black hole. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01820-x (2022).
Remillard, R. A. et al. An empirical background model for the NICER X-Ray Timing Instrument. Astron. J. 163, 130 (2022).
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4ae6
HI4PI Collaboration. HI4PI: a full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A116 (2016).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178
Wiersema, K. et al. Polarimetry of the transient relativistic jet of GRB 110328/Swift J164449.3+573451. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1942–1948 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20379.x
Planck Collaboration. Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A11 (2014).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323195
Eftekhari, T., Berger, E., Zauderer, B. A., Margutti, R. & Alexander, K. D. Radio monitoring of the tidal disruption event Swift J164449.3+573451. III. Late-time jet energetics and a deviation from equipartition. Astrophys. J. 854, 86 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa8e0
Fremling, C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. I. Spectroscopic classification and the redshift completeness of local galaxy catalogs. Astrophys. J. 895, 32 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8943
Perley, D. A. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A public statistical sample for exploring supernova demographics. Astrophys. J. 904, 35 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd98
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. The photometric and spectroscopic evolution of rapidly evolving extragalactic transients in ZTF. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08811 (2021).
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. Cosmological fast optical transients with the Zwicky Transient Facility: a search for dirty fireballs. Astrophys. J. 938, 85 (2022).
Cenko, S. B. et al. iPTF14yb: the first discovery of a gamma-ray burst afterglow independent of a high-energy trigger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 803, L24 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/803/2/L24
Cowperthwaite, P. S. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, optical, and near-infrared light curves and comparison to kilonova models. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L17 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8fc7
Kasliwal, M. M. et al. Illuminating gravitational waves: a concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1559–1565 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aap9455
Drout, M. R. et al. Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: implications for r-process nucleosynthesis. Science 358, 1570–1574 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0049
Villar, V. A., Berger, E., Metzger, B. D. & Guillochon, J. Theoretical models of optical transients. I. A broad exploration of the duration–luminosity phase space. Astrophys. J. 849, 70 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8fcb