OSTEOTOMY AT THE BASE OF FEMORAL NECK AND OSTEOPLASTY FOR THE TREAMENT OF SCFE.
Femoroacetabular Impingement
Hip Joint
Joint Deformities, Acquired
Muscle Strength Dynamometer
Osteotomy
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses
Journal
Acta ortopedica brasileira
ISSN: 1413-7852
Titre abrégé: Acta Ortop Bras
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 9804509
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
05
10
2021
accepted:
24
01
2022
entrez:
1
12
2022
pubmed:
2
12
2022
medline:
2
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the clinical outcomes between patients with moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated with osteotomy at the base of neck and osteoplasty and with healthy individuals. Comparative cohort with 12 patients (14 hips) with moderate and severe SCFE who underwent osteotomy at the base of neck and osteoplasty between 2007 and 2014. The mean age at surgery was 13.3 ± 2.5 years and the mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 2.2 years. We assessed the level of hip pain by the visual analog scale (VAS) and anterior impingement test (AIT); the level of function using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), the range of motion (ROM) by goniometry and Drehmann sign, and the hip muscular strength by isokinetic and Trendelenburg sign. The level of pain was slightly higher in the SCFE cohort compared with healthy hips (VAS, 0.8 ± 1.4 vs 0 ± 0, 0.007; AIT, 14% vs 0%, p = 0.06; respectively). No differences were observed between the SCFE and control cohort for the functional scores (HHS, 94 ± 7 vs 100 ± 1, p = 0.135); except for ROM, with increased internal rotation (37.3º ± 9.4º vs 28.7º ± 8.2º, p < 0.001), and strength, with decreased abduction torque (75.5 ± 36.9 Nm/Kg vs 88.5 ± 27.6 Nm/Kg, p = 0.045) in the SCFE cohort. The osteotomy at the base of neck and the osteoplasty restored the hip motion and muscle strength, except for the abductor strength, to near normal levels, representing a viable option for the treatment of moderate and severe SCFE. Comparar resultados clínicos de pacientes com escorregamento epifisário proximal do fêmur (EEPF) moderado e grave tratados com osteotomia basocervical e cervicoplastia com indivíduos saudáveis. Coorte comparativa com 12 voluntários saudáveis e 12 pacientes (14 quadris) com EEPF moderado e grave submetidos à osteotomia basocervical e cervicoplastia entre 2007 e 2014. A média de idade na cirurgia foi de 13,3 ± 2,5 anos e o seguimento médio de 3,8 ± 2,2 anos. Avaliou-se nível de dor no quadril utilizando a escala visual analógica (EVA) e o teste de impacto anterior (TIA); nível de função usando o Harris Hip Score (HHS) e o 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12); amplitude de movimento (ADM) com goniometria e sinal de Drehmann; e força muscular do quadril com dinamômetro isocinético e sinal de Trendelenburg. O nível de dor foi ligeiramente maior na coorte de EEPF comparado a quadris saudáveis (EVA, 0,8 ± 1,4 vs 0 ± 0, 0,007; TIA, 14% vs 0%, p = 0,06; respectivamente). Não foram observadas diferenças entre os grupos EEPF e controle para os escores funcionais (HHS, 94 ± 7 vs 100 ± 1, p = 0,135), exceto para ADM, com aumento da rotação interna (37,3º ± 9,4º vs 28,7º ± 8,2º, p < 0,001), e força, com diminuição do torque de abdução (75,5 ± 36,9 Nm/Kg vs 88,5 ± 27,6 Nm/Kg, p = 0,045), para o grupo EEPF. A osteotomia basocervical e a cervicoplastia restauraram o movimento do quadril e a força muscular, com exceção da força abdutora, a níveis próximos do normal, representando uma opção viável para o tratamento de EEPF moderado e grave. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo de Coorte Ambidirecional.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(por)
Comparar resultados clínicos de pacientes com escorregamento epifisário proximal do fêmur (EEPF) moderado e grave tratados com osteotomia basocervical e cervicoplastia com indivíduos saudáveis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36451795
doi: 10.1590/1413-785220223005e257002
pmc: PMC9670781
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e257002Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors declare no potential conflict of interest related to this article.
Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Mar-Apr;21(2):189-93
pubmed: 11242248
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):281-5
pubmed: 16670535
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Aug;75(8):1134-40
pubmed: 8354671
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):798-801
pubmed: 12728027
J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):171-7
pubmed: 15718896
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020 May;29(3):283-291
pubmed: 31651754
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1977 Oct;115(5):716-25
pubmed: 930245
Bone Joint J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1119-23
pubmed: 25086130
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007 Oct;19(4):389-410
pubmed: 17940736
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jan;454:163-8
pubmed: 16906086
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Jul;49(5):807-35
pubmed: 6029256
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
pubmed: 5783851
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2108-17
pubmed: 25502479
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Mar;32(2):125-30
pubmed: 22327445
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jun;29(4):336-40
pubmed: 19461373
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):816-21
pubmed: 21515390
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):692-8
pubmed: 18941860
J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):148-55
pubmed: 15076598
Arthroscopy. 2014 Oct;30(10):1229-34
pubmed: 25064759
J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Sep-Oct;17(5):648-54
pubmed: 9592004
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Aug;71(4):370-5
pubmed: 11028885
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Aug;39(7):339-346
pubmed: 31305376
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):704-16
pubmed: 19142692
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1212-1228
pubmed: 28194709
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(6):275-281
pubmed: 31169746
Sports Med. 2003;33(10):727-43
pubmed: 12895130
J Child Orthop. 2017 Aug 1;11(4):284-288
pubmed: 28904634
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Sep;58(6):796-800
pubmed: 956225
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Sep;39(8):411-415
pubmed: 31393301
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Summer;5(3):162-7
pubmed: 8866280
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):535-9
pubmed: 19700979
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1524-1532
pubmed: 30418052
Can J Surg. 2004 Aug;47(4):284-9
pubmed: 15362331
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Oct-Nov;34(7):668-73
pubmed: 24705348