Responsiveness and Minimally Important Changes for Persian-version of Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire in Patients with Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy Following Physiotherapy Intervention.
Lateral elbow tendinopathy
Measurement properties
Minimal important change
Patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation
Rehabilitation
Journal
The archives of bone and joint surgery
ISSN: 2345-4644
Titre abrégé: Arch Bone Jt Surg
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101636743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
26
04
2022
accepted:
19
07
2022
entrez:
1
12
2022
pubmed:
2
12
2022
medline:
2
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluating responsiveness and calculating minimally important change (MIC) for the Persian-version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire following physiotherapy in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). We enrolled 82 patients with LET to complete the PRTEE. After completing four weeks of physiotherapy, all patients were reevaluated by the PRTEE. The patients also rated their changes on a 7-point global rating of change scale (GRoC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and correlation analysis were used for evaluating the responsiveness. The MIC was determined by determining a desirable cutoff on the ROC curve. The results showed a moderate relationship (Spearman's correlation coefficient= 0.43-0.56) of total PRTEE, pain subscale, and function subscale with the GRoC scale. The total PRTEE, pain subscale, and function subscale revealed an area under the curve of 0.87, 0.82, and 0.83, respectively. We found the MICs 31.33, 14.5, and 15.5 points for total PRTEE, pain subscale, and function subscale, respectively. The Persian-version of the PRTEE questionnaire has acceptable responsiveness and can measure changes in patients with LET following physiotherapy. We advocate using the PRTEE questionnaire in both clinical settings and research.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Evaluating responsiveness and calculating minimally important change (MIC) for the Persian-version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire following physiotherapy in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We enrolled 82 patients with LET to complete the PRTEE. After completing four weeks of physiotherapy, all patients were reevaluated by the PRTEE. The patients also rated their changes on a 7-point global rating of change scale (GRoC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and correlation analysis were used for evaluating the responsiveness. The MIC was determined by determining a desirable cutoff on the ROC curve.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The results showed a moderate relationship (Spearman's correlation coefficient= 0.43-0.56) of total PRTEE, pain subscale, and function subscale with the GRoC scale. The total PRTEE, pain subscale, and function subscale revealed an area under the curve of 0.87, 0.82, and 0.83, respectively. We found the MICs 31.33, 14.5, and 15.5 points for total PRTEE, pain subscale, and function subscale, respectively.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The Persian-version of the PRTEE questionnaire has acceptable responsiveness and can measure changes in patients with LET following physiotherapy. We advocate using the PRTEE questionnaire in both clinical settings and research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36452415
doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.65220.3128
pmc: PMC9702018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
885-891Références
J Interprof Care. 2012 Jan;26(1):56-63
pubmed: 22233369
J Hand Ther. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1):3-10; quiz 11
pubmed: 17254903
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70
pubmed: 20046623
J Physiother. 2014 Dec;60(4):240
pubmed: 25278488
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Sep;28(9):862-72
pubmed: 24634444
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171-8
pubmed: 3818871
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(19):5402-5417
pubmed: 34196231
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Sep;18(5):712-9
pubmed: 23749174
J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):243-66
pubmed: 15162109
Sports Health. 2013 Mar;5(2):186-94
pubmed: 24427389
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68
pubmed: 10812317
Rheumatol Int. 2017 May;37(5):743-750
pubmed: 27904948
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2902-2907
pubmed: 33180555
Phys Ther. 2012 Aug;92(8):1036-45
pubmed: 22577068
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;47(17):1112-9
pubmed: 23709519
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(14):1285-90
pubmed: 25243764
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Nov 14;8:40
pubmed: 24225254
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;39(7):411-22; discussion 411-22
pubmed: 15976161
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;40(1):81-5
pubmed: 16371498
Lancet. 2002 Feb 23;359(9307):657-62
pubmed: 11879861
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;50(8):869-79
pubmed: 9291871
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):879-83
pubmed: 15082988
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jul;26(7):1037-40
pubmed: 25140091
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Sep;36(9):1019-1026
pubmed: 30468412
Iran J Med Sci. 2019 Sep;44(5):390-396
pubmed: 31582863
J Hand Ther. 2010 Oct-Dec;23(4):361-70; quiz 371
pubmed: 20638823
Caspian J Intern Med. 2013 Spring;4(2):627-35
pubmed: 24009950
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1153-1164
pubmed: 32975171
Int J Prev Med. 2015 Jul 08;6:59
pubmed: 26288703
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 15;37(8):711-5
pubmed: 21796022