Decision-centered design of a clinical decision support system for acute management of pediatric congenital heart disease.
cognitive task analysis
congenital heart disease
decision centered design
decision support
digital health
emergency medicine
macrocognition
Journal
Frontiers in digital health
ISSN: 2673-253X
Titre abrégé: Front Digit Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101771889
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
11
08
2022
accepted:
12
10
2022
entrez:
1
12
2022
pubmed:
2
12
2022
medline:
2
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Children with congenital heart disease (CHD), have fragile hemodynamics and can deteriorate due to common childhood illnesses and the natural progression of their disease. During these acute periods of deterioration, these children often present to their local emergency departments (ED) where expertise in CHD is limited, and appropriate intervention is crucial to their survival. Previous studies identified that determining the appropriate intervention for CHD patients can be difficult for ED physicians, particularly since key components of effective decision making are not being met. Although key components of effective decision making for ED physicians have been identified, they have yet to be transformed into actionable guidance. We used decision centered design (DCD) to translate key components of decision making into decision requirements and associated design concepts, that we subsequently incorporated into a prototype clinical decision support system (CDSS). Using framework analysis, transcripts from Critical Decision Method interviews of CHD experts and ED physicians were inductively coded to identify key decision requirements for ED physicians that are currently not well supported, and their associated design concepts. A design workshop was held to refine the identified key decision requirements and design concepts as well as to sketch information that would satisfy the identified requirements. These were iteratively incorporated into a prototype CDSS. Three decision requirements: (1) We identified key decision requirements and associated design concepts, that informed the design of a CDSS to provide actionable guidance for ED physicians when managing CHD patients. Meeting ED physicians' decision components with a CDSS requires the translation of their key decision requirements in its design. If not, we risk creating designs that interfere with clinician performance.
Sections du résumé
Background and Objectives
UNASSIGNED
Children with congenital heart disease (CHD), have fragile hemodynamics and can deteriorate due to common childhood illnesses and the natural progression of their disease. During these acute periods of deterioration, these children often present to their local emergency departments (ED) where expertise in CHD is limited, and appropriate intervention is crucial to their survival. Previous studies identified that determining the appropriate intervention for CHD patients can be difficult for ED physicians, particularly since key components of effective decision making are not being met. Although key components of effective decision making for ED physicians have been identified, they have yet to be transformed into actionable guidance. We used decision centered design (DCD) to translate key components of decision making into decision requirements and associated design concepts, that we subsequently incorporated into a prototype clinical decision support system (CDSS).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Using framework analysis, transcripts from Critical Decision Method interviews of CHD experts and ED physicians were inductively coded to identify key decision requirements for ED physicians that are currently not well supported, and their associated design concepts. A design workshop was held to refine the identified key decision requirements and design concepts as well as to sketch information that would satisfy the identified requirements. These were iteratively incorporated into a prototype CDSS.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Three decision requirements: (1)
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
We identified key decision requirements and associated design concepts, that informed the design of a CDSS to provide actionable guidance for ED physicians when managing CHD patients. Meeting ED physicians' decision components with a CDSS requires the translation of their key decision requirements in its design. If not, we risk creating designs that interfere with clinician performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36452427
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1016522
pmc: PMC9701701
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1016522Informations de copyright
© 2022 Assadi, Laussen, Freire, Ghassemi and Trbovich.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):719-728
pubmed: 31556075
Circulation. 2018 May 29;137(22):e691-e782
pubmed: 29685887
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 25;10(3):e035313
pubmed: 32213525
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;14(3):248-55
pubmed: 23462352
Appl Ergon. 2019 May;77:70-82
pubmed: 30832780
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1993 Sep;16(1):42-51
pubmed: 8311424
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:116-26
pubmed: 18039405
J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2016 Mar;10(1):74-90
pubmed: 26973441
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 29;7:54
pubmed: 26858684
J Pediatr. 2011 Aug;159(2):273-7.e1
pubmed: 21392789
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 9;72(15):1817-1825
pubmed: 30286926
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 03;9:767378
pubmed: 35187118