Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A and sciatic nerve crush rat models: insights from proteomics.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A Gene Ontology SWATH-MS endoplasmic reticulum neurogenesis oxidative stress proteomics rat repair sciatic nerve crush

Journal

Neural regeneration research
ISSN: 1673-5374
Titre abrégé: Neural Regen Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101316351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
entrez: 1 12 2022
pubmed: 2 12 2022
medline: 2 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The sensorimotor and histological aspects of peripheral neuropathies were already studied by our team in two rat models: the sciatic nerve crush and the Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A disease. In this study, we sought to highlight and compare the protein signature of these two pathological situations. Indeed, the identification of protein profiles in diseases can play an important role in the development of pharmacological targets. In fact, Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A rats develop motor impairments that are more severe in the hind limbs. Therefore, for the first time, protein expression in sciatic nerve of Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A rats was examined. First, distal sciatic nerves were collected from Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A and uninjured wild-type rats aged 3 months. After protein extraction, sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry was employed. 445 proteins mapped to Swiss-Prot or trEMBL Uniprot databases were identified and quantified. Of these, 153 proteins showed statistically significant differences between Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A and wild-type groups. The majority of these proteins were overexpressed in Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A. Hierarchical clustering and functional enrichment using Gene Ontology were used to group these proteins based on their biological effects concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A pathophysiology. Second, proteomic characterization of wild-type rats subjected to sciatic nerve crush was performed sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. One month after injury, distal sciatic nerves were collected and analyzed as described above. Out of 459 identified proteins, 92 showed significant differences between sciatic nerve crush and the uninjured wild-type rats used in the first study. The results suggest that young adult Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A rats (3 months old) develop compensatory mechanisms at the level of redox balance, protein folding, myelination, and axonogenesis. These mechanisms seem insufficient to hurdle the progress of the disease. Notably, response to oxidative stress appears to be a significant feature of Charcot-Marie-Tooth-1A, potentially playing a role in the pathological process. In contrast to the first experiment, the majority of the proteins that differed from wild-type were downregulated in the sciatic nerve crush group. Functional enrichment suggested that neurogenesis, response to axon injury, and oxidative stress were important biological processes. Protein analysis revealed an imperfect repair at this time point after injury and identified several distinguishable proteins. In conclusion, we suggest that peripheral neuropathies, whether of a genetic or traumatic cause, share some common pathological pathways. This study may provide directions for better characterization of these models and/or identifying new specific therapeutic targets.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36453423
pii: NeuralRegenRes_2023_18_6_1354_357911
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.357911
pmc: PMC9838138
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1354-1363

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None

Références

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;62(4):310-8
pubmed: 9120441
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57
pubmed: 19131956
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D447-52
pubmed: 25352553
Brain. 2012 Jan;135(Pt 1):72-87
pubmed: 22189569
Med Clin North Am. 2019 Mar;103(2):383-397
pubmed: 30704689
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000412
pubmed: 20613859
Mol Syst Biol. 2018 Aug 13;14(8):e8126
pubmed: 30104418
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):1070-1078
pubmed: 30100211
Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 Dec;161:246-262
pubmed: 32980538
Neuron. 1996 May;16(5):1049-60
pubmed: 8630243
Free Radic Biol Med. 2011 Oct 1;51(7):1302-19
pubmed: 21782935
J Neurosci. 2017 Dec 13;37(50):12297-12313
pubmed: 29109239
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005 Feb;4(2):120-32
pubmed: 15509515
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 1;91(3):913-7
pubmed: 8302866
Molecules. 2017 Oct 14;22(10):
pubmed: 29036910
Neuropharmacology. 2018 Sep 1;139:98-116
pubmed: 30018000
FASEB J. 2011 Nov;25(11):3929-37
pubmed: 21831887
Anal Chem. 2008 Jul 1;80(13):4933-44
pubmed: 18537272
Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(3):157-65
pubmed: 26849231
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 21;12(1):2356
pubmed: 33883545
J Anat. 2002 Apr;200(4):357-66
pubmed: 12090402
Trends Biochem Sci. 2018 Aug;43(8):593-605
pubmed: 30056836
Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 27;15:689938
pubmed: 34646114
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22901
pubmed: 21826216
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 16;21(16):
pubmed: 32824294
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Jan 18;716:134678
pubmed: 31816334
Biomaterials. 2008 Nov;29(33):4409-19
pubmed: 18723219
Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Oct;18(4):2200-2221
pubmed: 34595734
J Cell Mol Med. 2018 Jan;22(1):429-438
pubmed: 28857429
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 15;32(18):2847-9
pubmed: 27207943
Mol Neurobiol. 2013 Apr;47(2):673-98
pubmed: 23224996
J Neurosci. 2004 Dec 1;24(48):10806-15
pubmed: 15574731
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019 Nov;26(11):1053-1062
pubmed: 31695187
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 12;20(14):
pubmed: 31336816
J Neurochem. 2000 Oct;75(4):1465-74
pubmed: 10987826
Nat Immunol. 2014 Feb;15(2):112-7
pubmed: 24448568
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000410
pubmed: 32663219
Microsurgery. 2008;28(6):458-70
pubmed: 18623156
Exp Neurol. 2007 Sep;207(1):64-74
pubmed: 17628540
Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 Jan 04;9:162
pubmed: 28101003
Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Feb 11;13:33
pubmed: 30804758
Elife. 2020 Mar 04;9:
pubmed: 32130108
Gene. 2017 Jun 30;618:14-23
pubmed: 28286085
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jul;90(7):940-51
pubmed: 26141332
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Mar 15;398:79-90
pubmed: 30685714

Auteurs

Zeina Msheik (Z)

UR20218 NeurIT (NEURopathies périphériques et Innovation Thérapeutique), University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Stephanie Durand (S)

BISCEm (Biologie Intégrative Santé Chimie Environnement) Platform, US 42 Inserm/UAR 2015 CNRS; UMR 1308 Inserm/CHU-CAPTuR (Contrôle de l'Activation cellulaire, Progression Tumorale et Résistance thérapeutique), University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Emilie Pinault (E)

BISCEm (Biologie Intégrative Santé Chimie Environnement) Platform, US 42 Inserm/UAR 2015 CNRS, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Martial Caillaud (M)

Inserm UMR1235-TENS (The Enteric Nervous System in Gut and Brain Diseases), University of Nantes, Nantes, France.

Laetitia Vignaud (L)

UR20218 NeurIT (NEURopathies périphériques et Innovation Thérapeutique), University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Fabrice Billet (F)

UR20218 NeurIT (NEURopathies périphériques et Innovation Thérapeutique), University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Mohamed El Massry (M)

UR20218 NeurIT (NEURopathies périphériques et Innovation Thérapeutique), University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Alexis Desmouliere (A)

UR20218 NeurIT (NEURopathies périphériques et Innovation Thérapeutique), University of Limoges, Limoges, France.

Classifications MeSH