Validity of muscular fitness self-assessments in the ecofit smartphone application: A correlation study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
accepted:
16
11
2022
entrez:
1
12
2022
pubmed:
2
12
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mobile app-based interventions have the potential for wide-reach and therefore may be a useful tool in up-scaling physical activity interventions. In larger-scale interventions, face-to-face assessments are less cost-effective, and researchers often rely on surveys or activity trackers to assess outcomes. However, there is limited evidence of valid muscular fitness assessments that can be self-administered within mHealth interventions. As such, this study will evaluate the concurrent validity of upper and lower body muscular fitness that have been independently assessed by participants via the ecofit app, and face-to-face assessments conducted by a trained researcher. This study compared baseline data from two muscular fitness tests from the ecofit two-armed randomised controlled trial and self-assessed data collected via the ecofit smartphone app (i.e., validated 90-degree push-up and 60-second sit-to-stand test). To assess the concurrent validity, the self-assessed push-up and sit-to-stand tests (i.e., collected via the ecofit app) were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient against the researcher-assessed results (i.e., objective results collected during baseline assessment for the ecofit trial). Bland-Altman plots were also used to allow visualisation of the differences between the self- and research-assessed tests. Participants (N = 54) completed the push-up (24.1%) and sit-to-stand (100%) tests within 14-days of receiving the app. The results revealed a strong significant correlation for the push-up test (0.83, p<0.001) and a moderate significant correlation for the sit-to-stand test (0.63, p<0.001). This study provides support for the concurrent validity of self-reported upper and lower body muscular fitness assessments (i.e., the push-up and sit-to-stand tests) in mHealth. While these tests may be a feasible option for large scale physical activity interventions, more research is needed to determine the generalisability of these results.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Mobile app-based interventions have the potential for wide-reach and therefore may be a useful tool in up-scaling physical activity interventions. In larger-scale interventions, face-to-face assessments are less cost-effective, and researchers often rely on surveys or activity trackers to assess outcomes. However, there is limited evidence of valid muscular fitness assessments that can be self-administered within mHealth interventions. As such, this study will evaluate the concurrent validity of upper and lower body muscular fitness that have been independently assessed by participants via the ecofit app, and face-to-face assessments conducted by a trained researcher.
METHODS
This study compared baseline data from two muscular fitness tests from the ecofit two-armed randomised controlled trial and self-assessed data collected via the ecofit smartphone app (i.e., validated 90-degree push-up and 60-second sit-to-stand test). To assess the concurrent validity, the self-assessed push-up and sit-to-stand tests (i.e., collected via the ecofit app) were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient against the researcher-assessed results (i.e., objective results collected during baseline assessment for the ecofit trial). Bland-Altman plots were also used to allow visualisation of the differences between the self- and research-assessed tests.
RESULTS
Participants (N = 54) completed the push-up (24.1%) and sit-to-stand (100%) tests within 14-days of receiving the app. The results revealed a strong significant correlation for the push-up test (0.83, p<0.001) and a moderate significant correlation for the sit-to-stand test (0.63, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
This study provides support for the concurrent validity of self-reported upper and lower body muscular fitness assessments (i.e., the push-up and sit-to-stand tests) in mHealth. While these tests may be a feasible option for large scale physical activity interventions, more research is needed to determine the generalisability of these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36454865
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278374
pii: PONE-D-21-37114
pmc: PMC9714846
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0278374Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Jansson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Implement Sci. 2007 Dec 09;2:42
pubmed: 18067681
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 15;11:934
pubmed: 22168312
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 12;18(8):e223
pubmed: 27520283
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e12053
pubmed: 30888321
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0260332
pubmed: 34797895
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(5):643-50
pubmed: 24013912
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Sep 24;16:100457
pubmed: 31737798
Int J Public Health. 2013 Dec;58(6):949-53
pubmed: 23974352
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462
pubmed: 33239350
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 10;17(11):e253
pubmed: 26554314
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 12;16(6):e136
pubmed: 24927299
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:36-46
pubmed: 28734170
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 22;18(1):16
pubmed: 33482837
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 04;21(5):
pubmed: 33806379
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;55(8):422-432
pubmed: 33355160
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71
pubmed: 23638278
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Gait Posture. 2021 Feb;84:120-126
pubmed: 33310432
Sports Med Open. 2020 Aug 26;6(1):40
pubmed: 32844333
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Sep;8(5):905-13
pubmed: 26283292
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 24;7(1):81
pubmed: 33757587
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:404-411
pubmed: 28887192
Jacobs J Community Med. 2016;2(1):
pubmed: 27034992
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Feb;80(1):163-6
pubmed: 7624188