What can we learn from China's health insurance reform to improve the horizontal equity of healthcare financing?
Financing
Health insurance
Healthcare payment
Horizontal inequity
Redistributive effect
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2022
01 12 2022
Historique:
received:
28
03
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
1
12
2022
pubmed:
2
12
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Universal health coverage is a challenge to horizontal equity in healthcare financing. Since 1998, China has extended its healthcare insurance schemes, and individuals with equal incomes but different attributes such as social status, profession, geographic access to health care, and health conditions, are covered by the same health insurance scheme. This study aims to examine horizontal inequity in the Chinese healthcare financing system in 2002 and 2007 using data from two national household health surveys. Multi-stage stratified random sampling was used to select 3,946 households with 13,619 individuals in 2002, and 3,958 households with 12,973 individuals in 2007. A decomposition method was used to measure the horizontal inequity and reranking in healthcare finance. Over the period 2002-2007, the absolute value of horizontal inequity in total healthcare payments decreased from 997.83 percentage points to 199.87 percentage points in urban areas, and increased from 22.28 percentage points to 48.80 percentage points in rural areas. The horizontal inequity in social health insurance remained almost the same in urban areas, at around 27 percentage points, but decreased from 110.90 percentage points to 7.80 percentage points in rural areas. Horizontal inequity in out-of-pocket payments decreased from 178.43 percentage points to 80.96 percentage points in urban areas, and increased from 26.06 percentage points to 41.40 percentage points in rural areas. The horizontal inequity of healthcare finance in China over the period 2002-2007 was reduced by general taxation and social insurance, but strongly affected by out-of-pocket payments. Increasing the benefits from social health insurance would help to reduce horizontal inequity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Universal health coverage is a challenge to horizontal equity in healthcare financing. Since 1998, China has extended its healthcare insurance schemes, and individuals with equal incomes but different attributes such as social status, profession, geographic access to health care, and health conditions, are covered by the same health insurance scheme. This study aims to examine horizontal inequity in the Chinese healthcare financing system in 2002 and 2007 using data from two national household health surveys.
METHODS
Multi-stage stratified random sampling was used to select 3,946 households with 13,619 individuals in 2002, and 3,958 households with 12,973 individuals in 2007. A decomposition method was used to measure the horizontal inequity and reranking in healthcare finance.
RESULTS
Over the period 2002-2007, the absolute value of horizontal inequity in total healthcare payments decreased from 997.83 percentage points to 199.87 percentage points in urban areas, and increased from 22.28 percentage points to 48.80 percentage points in rural areas. The horizontal inequity in social health insurance remained almost the same in urban areas, at around 27 percentage points, but decreased from 110.90 percentage points to 7.80 percentage points in rural areas. Horizontal inequity in out-of-pocket payments decreased from 178.43 percentage points to 80.96 percentage points in urban areas, and increased from 26.06 percentage points to 41.40 percentage points in rural areas.
CONCLUSION
The horizontal inequity of healthcare finance in China over the period 2002-2007 was reduced by general taxation and social insurance, but strongly affected by out-of-pocket payments. Increasing the benefits from social health insurance would help to reduce horizontal inequity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36456952
doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01793-3
pii: 10.1186/s12939-022-01793-3
pmc: PMC9714061
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
170Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Health Econ. 2003 Nov;12(11):921-34
pubmed: 14601155
Health Econ. 2009 Jul;18 Suppl 2:S47-64
pubmed: 19551751
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Sep 1;90(9):664-71
pubmed: 22984311
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 18;12:466
pubmed: 23244513
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1998 Oct-Dec;13(4):289-306
pubmed: 10346051
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 23;12:20
pubmed: 23522336
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 01;9(10):e108867
pubmed: 25271768
J Health Econ. 2010 Jul;29(4):479-88
pubmed: 20452070
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):149-163
pubmed: 26524988
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Aug;28(5):467-79
pubmed: 22987824
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Mar;10(2):283-289
pubmed: 30044060
J Health Econ. 2008 Dec;27(6):1582-93
pubmed: 18774190
Front Med. 2012 Mar;6(1):79-84
pubmed: 22460451
J Health Econ. 1997 Oct;16(5):499-516
pubmed: 10175628
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002405
pubmed: 29040263