Silver-coated versus uncoated locking plates in subjects with fractures of the distal tibia: a randomized, subject and observer-blinded, multi-center non-inferiority study.
Antibacterial
Antimicrobial
Fracture
Orthopedic
Randomized
Silver-coating
Tibia
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2022
01 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
02
05
2022
accepted:
11
11
2022
entrez:
2
12
2022
pubmed:
3
12
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antimicrobial coatings of implants are of interest to reduce infection rate in orthopedic surgery. Demonstration of clinical effectiveness of such coated implants to obtain market approval is challenging. The objective of this article is to define a design for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a silver-coating for locking plates for fracture treatment. The study design has to respect different criteria, such as feasibility, focus on overall complications, such as functional impairment, fracture healing, and particularly on infection rates. Distal tibia fractures were chosen due to the high prevalence of infections in this type of injuries, which warrants a particular benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis and thus might allow to see a statistical trend in favor of the coated product. The study design was defined as a randomized, controlled, subject and observer-blinded, multi-center study in subjects with fractures of the distal tibia with a total of 226 patients. A number of 113 patients are planned for each of the two treatment arms with treatment of the fracture with a silver-coated device (first arm) or with an uncoated device (second arm). Inclusion criteria are closed fractures of the distal tibia according to the Tscherne-Oestern classification or open fractures of the distal tibia according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification in subjects older than 18 years. Primary outcome parameter is the Anticipated Adverse Device Effects (AADE) including all typical complications of this type of injury, such as functional impairment of the affected limb, non-union, and infections based on a non-inferiority study design. Also, silver-typical complications, such as argyria, are included. Secondary parameters are infection rates and fracture healing. Follow-up of patients includes five visits with clinical and X-ray evaluations with a follow-up time of 12 months. Demonstration of clinical effectiveness of antimicrobial coatings of fracture fixation devices remains a challenge. Definition of a prospective randomized pre-market trial design and recruitment of clinical sites for such a study is possible. A confirmative proof of the expected clinical benefit in terms of reduction of device-related infections will be addressed with a prospective post-market clinical follow-up study in a second step due to the large sample size required. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05260463. Registered on 02 March 2022.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial coatings of implants are of interest to reduce infection rate in orthopedic surgery. Demonstration of clinical effectiveness of such coated implants to obtain market approval is challenging. The objective of this article is to define a design for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a silver-coating for locking plates for fracture treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
The study design has to respect different criteria, such as feasibility, focus on overall complications, such as functional impairment, fracture healing, and particularly on infection rates. Distal tibia fractures were chosen due to the high prevalence of infections in this type of injuries, which warrants a particular benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis and thus might allow to see a statistical trend in favor of the coated product. The study design was defined as a randomized, controlled, subject and observer-blinded, multi-center study in subjects with fractures of the distal tibia with a total of 226 patients. A number of 113 patients are planned for each of the two treatment arms with treatment of the fracture with a silver-coated device (first arm) or with an uncoated device (second arm). Inclusion criteria are closed fractures of the distal tibia according to the Tscherne-Oestern classification or open fractures of the distal tibia according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification in subjects older than 18 years. Primary outcome parameter is the Anticipated Adverse Device Effects (AADE) including all typical complications of this type of injury, such as functional impairment of the affected limb, non-union, and infections based on a non-inferiority study design. Also, silver-typical complications, such as argyria, are included. Secondary parameters are infection rates and fracture healing. Follow-up of patients includes five visits with clinical and X-ray evaluations with a follow-up time of 12 months.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Demonstration of clinical effectiveness of antimicrobial coatings of fracture fixation devices remains a challenge. Definition of a prospective randomized pre-market trial design and recruitment of clinical sites for such a study is possible. A confirmative proof of the expected clinical benefit in terms of reduction of device-related infections will be addressed with a prospective post-market clinical follow-up study in a second step due to the large sample size required.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05260463. Registered on 02 March 2022.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36456987
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06919-0
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06919-0
pmc: PMC9714230
doi:
Substances chimiques
Silver
3M4G523W1G
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05260463']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
968Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 13GW0313A, 13GW0313B, 13GW0449A and 13GW0449B
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Biomaterials. 2007 Jun;28(18):2869-75
pubmed: 17368533
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Dec;24(12):757-63
pubmed: 21076248
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8
pubmed: 773941
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):988-92
pubmed: 23814255
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2542-2547
pubmed: 27181490
Injury. 2017 Mar;48(3):599-607
pubmed: 28088378
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):830-839
pubmed: 32164954
J Trauma. 1984 Aug;24(8):742-6
pubmed: 6471139
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):560-564
pubmed: 27417853
Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1285-90
pubmed: 19820935
Bone Joint Res. 2021 May;10(5):321-327
pubmed: 34008424
Injury. 2004 Jun;35(6):608-14
pubmed: 15135281
Trends Microbiol. 1997 Jun;5(6):234-40
pubmed: 9211644
Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):877-87
pubmed: 16895727
Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1106-11
pubmed: 27482025
Unfallheilkunde. 1982 Mar;85(3):111-5
pubmed: 7090085
Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Jun;20(2):115-9
pubmed: 24796830
Injury. 2016 Jul;47(7):1514-8
pubmed: 27173090
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;101(5):389-95
pubmed: 20119985
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 1;92(11):e13
pubmed: 20810849
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):252-7
pubmed: 25628291