Perspective: Opportunities for advancing aquatic invertebrate welfare.
anesthesia
animal welfare
euthanasia
humane slaughter
refinement
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
20
06
2022
accepted:
17
10
2022
entrez:
2
12
2022
pubmed:
3
12
2022
medline:
3
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Welfare considerations and regulations for invertebrates have lagged behind those for vertebrates, despite invertebrates comprising more than 95% of earth's species. Humans interact with and use aquatic invertebrates for exhibition in zoos and aquaria, as pets, research subjects, and important food sources. Recent research has indicated that aquatic invertebrates, in particular cephalopod mollusks and decapod crustaceans, experience stress and may be able to feel pain. With this article, we present results of a survey on attitudes of aquatic animal health professionals toward aquatic invertebrate welfare and provide practical recommendations for advancing aquatic invertebrate welfare across four areas of opportunity: use of anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia; development of less invasive diagnostic and research sampling methods based on 3R principles; use of humane slaughter methods for aquatic invertebrates; and reducing impacts of invasive procedures in aquaculture and fisheries. We encourage consideration of these opportunities to achieve far-reaching improvements in aquatic invertebrate welfare.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36458054
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.973376
pmc: PMC9705766
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
973376Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wahltinez, Stacy, Hadfield, Harms, Lewbart, Newton and Nunamaker.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Author AN is employed by ZooQuatic Laboratory, LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Exp Biol. 2004 Nov;207(Pt 24):4205-13
pubmed: 15531641
Insect Mol Biol. 2020 Feb;29(1):9-18
pubmed: 31206812
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2022 Mar;53(1):100-107
pubmed: 35339154
Science. 1961 Feb 3;133(3449):327
pubmed: 13709794
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 11;11(4):
pubmed: 33920380
Ital J Food Saf. 2017 Mar 28;6(1):6228
pubmed: 28462204
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 03;9(11):
pubmed: 31684181
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2011 Jun;42(2):295-9
pubmed: 22946408
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2019 Apr;50(1):96-106
pubmed: 31120667
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;11(7):
pubmed: 34206249
Comp Med. 2000 Oct;50(5):545-50
pubmed: 11099140
ILAR J. 2011;52(2):185-95
pubmed: 21709311
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 8;9:e11763
pubmed: 34285838
J Invertebr Pathol. 2013 Jan;112(1):49-56
pubmed: 22940154
J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 12;33(24):10021-6
pubmed: 23761897
Animals (Basel). 2018 Sep 18;8(9):
pubmed: 30231519
Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(4):285-304
pubmed: 16937023
J Exp Biol. 2015 Feb 15;218(Pt 4):581-91
pubmed: 25696821
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2019 Apr;50(1):123-126
pubmed: 31120670
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Jan;45(1):43-50
pubmed: 21676744
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):87-93
pubmed: 21350616
Biol Reprod. 2014 Mar 06;90(3):47
pubmed: 24451988
Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):340-4
pubmed: 21324350
Biol Bull. 2006 Jun;210(3):308-17
pubmed: 16801504
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 19;11(9):e0162894
pubmed: 27642755
J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2001 May 15;259(2):215-229
pubmed: 11343713
Invert Neurosci. 2020 May 30;20(3):10
pubmed: 32474706
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 1;60(5):556-567
pubmed: 34233805
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1998 Sep;111(3):359-66
pubmed: 9707481
ILAR J. 2011;52(2):175-84
pubmed: 21709310
Lab Anim. 1996 Oct;30(4):293-316
pubmed: 8938617
Front Physiol. 2018 Feb 20;9:109
pubmed: 29515454
iScience. 2021 Feb 23;24(3):102229
pubmed: 33733076