The Ruminant sorting mechanism protects teeth from abrasives.
chewing efficiency
dental evolution
forestomach
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 12 2022
06 12 2022
Historique:
entrez:
2
12
2022
pubmed:
3
12
2022
medline:
7
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dental wear due to ingestion of dust and grit has deleterious consequences. Herbivores that could not wash their food hence had to evolve particularly durable teeth, in parallel to the evolution of dental chewing surface complexity to increase chewing efficacy. The rumen sorting mechanism increases chewing efficacy beyond that reached by any other mammal and has been hypothesized to also offer an internal washing mechanism, which would be an outstanding example of an additional advantage by a physiological adaptation, but in vivo evidence is lacking so far. Here, we investigated four cannulated, live cows that received a diet to which sand was added. Silica in swallowed food and feces reflected experimental dietary sand contamination, whereas the regurgitate submitted to rumination remained close to the silica levels of the basal food. This helps explain how ruminants are able to tolerate high levels of dust or grit in their diet, with less high-crowned teeth than nonruminants in the same habitat. Palaeo-reconstructions based on dental morphology and dental wear traces need to take the ruminants' wear-protection mechanism into account. The inadvertent advantage likely contributed to the ruminants' current success in terms of species diversity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36459638
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212447119
pmc: PMC9894168
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sand
0
Dust
0
Silicon Dioxide
7631-86-9
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2212447119Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Science. 1996 Nov 29;274(5292):1489-92
pubmed: 8929401
Mamm Biol. 2021;101(6):941-948
pubmed: 34924918
J R Soc Interface. 2016 Jul;13(120):
pubmed: 27411727
J Oral Biosci. 2022 Jun;64(2):165-175
pubmed: 35390544
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1997 Sep-Oct;37(5):517-28
pubmed: 9436251
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2017 Feb;327(2-3):98-109
pubmed: 29356397
J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2014 Jun;321(5):283-98
pubmed: 24700486
J Comp Physiol B. 2015 Jul;185(5):559-73
pubmed: 25921796
Cell Rep. 2015 May 5;11(5):673-80
pubmed: 25921530
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Aug;86(3):733-58
pubmed: 21418504
Nature. 1965 Nov 20;208(5012):806-7
pubmed: 5868900
Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Dec 22;264(1389):1715-21
pubmed: 9447729
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1742-7
pubmed: 21068036
Br J Nutr. 1961;15:443-51
pubmed: 13685944
Nature. 2002 May 30;417(6888):538-40
pubmed: 12037565
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3339-46
pubmed: 22535784
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2015 Jan;179:182-91
pubmed: 25446938
J Anim Sci. 1988 Apr;66(4):992-9
pubmed: 3378956