Development of a new scale for the measurement of interprofessional collaboration among occupational therapists, physical therapists and speech-language therapists.
interprofessional collaboration
recovery rehabilitation ward
scale
Journal
Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT
ISSN: 1876-4398
Titre abrégé: Hong Kong J Occup Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101175716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
06
10
2021
accepted:
18
06
2022
entrez:
5
12
2022
pubmed:
6
12
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate an instrument to assess interprofessional collaboration by occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists. Item development consisted of a review of interprofessional collaboration and group interviews with occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists. The developed items were surveyed on a 4-point Likert scale among occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists. Ceiling effects, floor effects, and item-total correlation analysis for each item, as well as constructs, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity of the scales were evaluated. A total of 47 items were extracted for evaluation and 28 items with five factors ("team-oriented behavior," "exchange of opinions," "flexible response," "sharing the whole picture of the patient," and "coordination of support methods") were retained after the evaluation. The correlation coefficients of the five factors ranged from 0.48 to 0.72. The total score of each factor and the total score of all 28 items were compared for occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists, and the result showed that was no statistically significant difference between the total scores of all factors and the job titles. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the five factors are 0.842, 0.840, 0.805, 0.732, and 0.734 for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth factors, respectively. The developed scale includes items aimed at facilitating patients' activities of daily living through interprofessional collaboration, and its content reflects the expertise of occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists.
Sections du résumé
Background/Objective
UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate an instrument to assess interprofessional collaboration by occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Item development consisted of a review of interprofessional collaboration and group interviews with occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists. The developed items were surveyed on a 4-point Likert scale among occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists. Ceiling effects, floor effects, and item-total correlation analysis for each item, as well as constructs, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity of the scales were evaluated.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 47 items were extracted for evaluation and 28 items with five factors ("team-oriented behavior," "exchange of opinions," "flexible response," "sharing the whole picture of the patient," and "coordination of support methods") were retained after the evaluation. The correlation coefficients of the five factors ranged from 0.48 to 0.72. The total score of each factor and the total score of all 28 items were compared for occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists, and the result showed that was no statistically significant difference between the total scores of all factors and the job titles. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the five factors are 0.842, 0.840, 0.805, 0.732, and 0.734 for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth factors, respectively.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The developed scale includes items aimed at facilitating patients' activities of daily living through interprofessional collaboration, and its content reflects the expertise of occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language therapists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36467520
doi: 10.1177/15691861221111439
pii: 10.1177_15691861221111439
pmc: PMC9716465
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
146-153Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):99-107
pubmed: 23132203
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 06;15(2):
pubmed: 29415515
Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1185-94
pubmed: 19120949
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):147-161
pubmed: 31331216
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6:CD000072
pubmed: 28639262
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):465-73
pubmed: 15713178
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1217-30
pubmed: 25862411
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97
pubmed: 27532315
Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):486-94
pubmed: 17675656
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(3):184-9
pubmed: 22951281
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):10-5
pubmed: 18164324
Int J Integr Care. 2016 May 16;16(2):5
pubmed: 27616961
Nurs Forum. 2010 Apr-Jun;45(2):73-82
pubmed: 20536755
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Summer;29(3):178-84
pubmed: 19728383