Efficacy of body position on gastric residual in preterm infant: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Body position
Gastric emptying
Gastric residual
Neonate
Preterm babies
Journal
Clinical and experimental pediatrics
ISSN: 2713-4148
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Pediatr
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101761234
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
06
10
2021
accepted:
08
11
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
pubmed:
6
12
2022
entrez:
5
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Preterm babies are born before completion of 37 weeks of gestational. Compared to term neonates, preterm babies are difficult to adjust to extra uterine life and 15 million babies (11%) born before 37 weeks of gestation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate evidence concerning the efficacy of body position on gastric residual volume among preterm infants. We conducted a systematic search of studies trials published in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINHAL, Clinical Key, Cochrane Library, and Google scholar. Two authors independently appraised the selected randomized control trials for evaluating the effectiveness of body position on gastric emptying. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool using Revman 5.3 software. On assessment this systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 289 preterm infants from the included 7 trials, with the sample size ranging from 20-63. The gestational age ranged from 28-37 weeks, with an average gestational age of 31.7 weeks. The age of the participants postnatal ranged from 6.6 days to 33.4 days, with an average age of 18±6 days. The weight of the participants during data collection ranged from 1,272-2,683 g, with an average of 1,795 g. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that right lateral and prone position lesser gastric residual volume in comparison to preterm infants placed in supine and left lateral position.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Preterm babies are born before completion of 37 weeks of gestational. Compared to term neonates, preterm babies are difficult to adjust to extra uterine life and 15 million babies (11%) born before 37 weeks of gestation.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate evidence concerning the efficacy of body position on gastric residual volume among preterm infants.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of studies trials published in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINHAL, Clinical Key, Cochrane Library, and Google scholar. Two authors independently appraised the selected randomized control trials for evaluating the effectiveness of body position on gastric emptying. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool using Revman 5.3 software.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On assessment this systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 289 preterm infants from the included 7 trials, with the sample size ranging from 20-63. The gestational age ranged from 28-37 weeks, with an average gestational age of 31.7 weeks. The age of the participants postnatal ranged from 6.6 days to 33.4 days, with an average age of 18±6 days. The weight of the participants during data collection ranged from 1,272-2,683 g, with an average of 1,795 g.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that right lateral and prone position lesser gastric residual volume in comparison to preterm infants placed in supine and left lateral position.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36470278
pii: cep.2021.01508
doi: 10.3345/cep.2021.01508
pmc: PMC10248320
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
262-270Références
J Pediatr. 1974 Dec;85(6):764-9
pubmed: 4472449
Am J Perinatol. 2004 Apr;21(3):163-6
pubmed: 15085500
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 09;(11):CD001819
pubmed: 22071802
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jul;62(7):1039-43
pubmed: 18422595
Pediatr Neonatol. 2014 Oct;55(5):335-40
pubmed: 25129325
Breastfeed Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;13(6):438-443
pubmed: 30016174
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999 Jul;29(1):46-51
pubmed: 10400103
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Mar;88 Suppl 1:S5-7
pubmed: 22261289
Arch Dis Child. 1975 Jul;50(7):500-4
pubmed: 1167062
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;9:CD013335
pubmed: 34596901
Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Jul;68(1):103-8
pubmed: 9665103
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Jul 15;55(7):568-572
pubmed: 30129537
Acta Paediatr. 2003 Jun;92(6):721-7
pubmed: 12856985
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2000 Jun;12(3):223-9
pubmed: 10867619
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2003 Jun;33(4):488-94
pubmed: 15314424
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8505-24
pubmed: 25024606
J Pediatr. 2007 Dec;151(6):585-90, 590.e1-2
pubmed: 18035135
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Jan;53(1):1-4
pubmed: 19801946
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150(1):31-33
pubmed: 32524596
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Jan 8;45(1):6
pubmed: 30621733
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 Jul;71(1):F24-7
pubmed: 8092865
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Apr;48(4):437-42
pubmed: 19330932
Pediatrics. 1979 Apr;63(4):532-6
pubmed: 440862
Pediatr Res. 1985 May;19(5):466-71
pubmed: 4000773
Vaccine. 2016 Dec 1;34(49):6047-6056
pubmed: 27743648
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;72 Suppl 3:25-31
pubmed: 29635225
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(7):224-259
pubmed: 27820087
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Nov;50(11):1459-67
pubmed: 23537895
Acta Paediatr. 2010 Jan;99(1):42-6
pubmed: 20002013
Early Hum Dev. 2003 Nov;74(2):83-8
pubmed: 14580748
J Pediatr. 1992 Jun;120(6):947-53
pubmed: 1593357
Acta Paediatr. 1996 Sep;85(9):1112-5
pubmed: 8888928