Job satisfaction criteria to improve general practitioner recruitment: a Delphi consensus.

Delphi technique career choice family practice general practitioner job satisfaction

Journal

Family practice
ISSN: 1460-2229
Titre abrégé: Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500875

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Dec 2022
Historique:
entrez: 6 12 2022
pubmed: 7 12 2022
medline: 7 12 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The clinical general practitioner (GP) workforce is decreasing. Many studies have analysed the negative aspects of the profession but, few examine the positive aspects and job satisfaction. A European collaborative group including 8 participating countries recently conducted a qualitative study to analyse the positive factors and found 31 job satisfaction factors. To determine which of these 31 factors are important and applicable to future policies to improve family medicine attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in France. The Delphi consensus method was chosen. Two Delphi rounds were conducted in March-April 2017 and retained satisfaction factors with at least 70% of scores ≥7. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank these retained factors. Participants assigned 5 points to the factor they considered most important, 3 points to the second, and 1 point to the third. Factors receiving at least 5% (10 points) of the total points (198 points) were included in the final list. The expert panel included GPs and non-GPs. Twenty-nine experts began the procedure and 22 completed it. Thirty factors were retained after the 2 Delphi rounds. The NGT resulted in 8 factors: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of the patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration. These 8 job satisfaction factors are important to consider and apply to future policy development. In Europe, general practitioner (GP) numbers are falling. Policies considering GP job satisfaction could be a solution. GPs with higher job satisfaction have lower levels of stress and burnout, are more interested in their job, and stay in their job for longer. Recently, a European study found 31 GP factors that influence job satisfaction. However, it is not clear which of these 31 factors policy makers could use to improve attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in family medicine in France. A panel of experts consisting of GPs and non-GPs used the Delphi consensus method to agree on which satisfaction factors were relevant and important. These factors were then ranked in order of importance. The experts agreed upon thirty satisfaction factors. From these, 8 were ranked as most important: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in the healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration. These should be considered and applied to future policy development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The clinical general practitioner (GP) workforce is decreasing. Many studies have analysed the negative aspects of the profession but, few examine the positive aspects and job satisfaction. A European collaborative group including 8 participating countries recently conducted a qualitative study to analyse the positive factors and found 31 job satisfaction factors.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To determine which of these 31 factors are important and applicable to future policies to improve family medicine attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in France.
METHOD METHODS
The Delphi consensus method was chosen. Two Delphi rounds were conducted in March-April 2017 and retained satisfaction factors with at least 70% of scores ≥7. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank these retained factors. Participants assigned 5 points to the factor they considered most important, 3 points to the second, and 1 point to the third. Factors receiving at least 5% (10 points) of the total points (198 points) were included in the final list. The expert panel included GPs and non-GPs.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-nine experts began the procedure and 22 completed it. Thirty factors were retained after the 2 Delphi rounds. The NGT resulted in 8 factors: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of the patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These 8 job satisfaction factors are important to consider and apply to future policy development.
In Europe, general practitioner (GP) numbers are falling. Policies considering GP job satisfaction could be a solution. GPs with higher job satisfaction have lower levels of stress and burnout, are more interested in their job, and stay in their job for longer. Recently, a European study found 31 GP factors that influence job satisfaction. However, it is not clear which of these 31 factors policy makers could use to improve attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in family medicine in France. A panel of experts consisting of GPs and non-GPs used the Delphi consensus method to agree on which satisfaction factors were relevant and important. These factors were then ranked in order of importance. The experts agreed upon thirty satisfaction factors. From these, 8 were ranked as most important: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in the healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration. These should be considered and applied to future policy development.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
In Europe, general practitioner (GP) numbers are falling. Policies considering GP job satisfaction could be a solution. GPs with higher job satisfaction have lower levels of stress and burnout, are more interested in their job, and stay in their job for longer. Recently, a European study found 31 GP factors that influence job satisfaction. However, it is not clear which of these 31 factors policy makers could use to improve attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in family medicine in France. A panel of experts consisting of GPs and non-GPs used the Delphi consensus method to agree on which satisfaction factors were relevant and important. These factors were then ranked in order of importance. The experts agreed upon thirty satisfaction factors. From these, 8 were ranked as most important: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in the healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration. These should be considered and applied to future policy development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36472943
pii: 6874871
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac140
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : EGPRN

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Auteurs

Bernard Le Floch (B)

Department of Family Practice, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France.

Hilde Bastiaens (H)

Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Jean-Yves Le Reste (JY)

Department of Family Practice, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France.

Patrice Nabbe (P)

Department of Family Practice, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France.

Perrine Le Floch (P)

Department of Family Practice, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France.

Mael Cam (M)

Department of Family Practice, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France.

Tristan Montier (T)

Department of Family Practice, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France.
INSERM 1078 unit, SFR 148 ScInBioS unit, European University of Brittany, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Brest, France.

Lieve Peremans (L)

Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH