Is cognitive reserve associated with the prevention of cognitive decline after stroke? A Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cognitive Disorders
Dementia
Education
Reserve
Journal
Ageing research reviews
ISSN: 1872-9649
Titre abrégé: Ageing Res Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101128963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
26
09
2022
revised:
15
11
2022
accepted:
30
11
2022
pubmed:
7
12
2022
medline:
11
1
2023
entrez:
6
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of the effect of socio-behavioral cognitive reserve (CR) proxies on cognitive decline after stroke. Three journal search and indexing databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Sciences) were crossed to examine the scientific evidence systematically. In addition, meta-analytic techniques, using mixed-effect methods, were carried out to estimate the impact (pooled effect size) of CR proxies on either dementia incidence or cognitive decline after stroke. Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic revision, whereas nineteen of them were eligible for the meta-analysis. The findings showed that high education is associated with a decreased rate of post-stroke dementia. Moreover, other CR proxies (e.g., occupation, bilingualism or social interaction) demonstrate a protective effect against non-dementia cognitive decline after stroke, although some inconsistencies were found in the literature. Regarding the meta-analysis, occupational attainment and education) showed a protective effect against post-stroke cognitive impairment diagnosis in comparison with a mixed category of different CR proxies. Second, a main cognitive change effect was found, pointing to greater cognitive change after stroke in those with low vs. high CR. Our findings emphasize that CR may prevent cognitive decline after stroke, but this effect can be modulated by different factors such the CR proxy and individual characteristics such as age or type of lesion. The methodological divergences of the studies (i.e., follow-up intervals, cognitive outcomes) need unification to diminish external sources of variability for predicting rates of cognitive decline after stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36473672
pii: S1568-1637(22)00256-2
doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101814
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101814Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.