Trends in prevalence of hip osteoarthritis over a 10-year period in Japan: The ROAD study 2005-2015.
Cohort study
Hip
Osteoarthritis
Prevalence
Journal
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
ISSN: 2665-9131
Titre abrégé: Osteoarthr Cartil Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101767068
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
15
12
2021
accepted:
03
06
2022
entrez:
7
12
2022
pubmed:
8
12
2022
medline:
8
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The trends in prevalence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) over a 10-year period among Japanese men and women were investigated using the data from the Research on Osteoarthritis/osteoporosis Against Disability study. We analyzed the data of 2924 baseline survey participants (1026 men, 1898 women) aged 40-89 years (mean 70.7 years) residing in urban, mountainous, and coastal communities who were surveyed in 2005-2007. We compared these data with that of 2347 participants (726 men, 1621 women) aged 40-89 years (mean 69.2 years) from the fourth survey in 2015-2016. The fourth survey invited participants to attend follow-ups for baseline survey and recruited new participants. After scoring the radiographs using the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system, hip OA was defined as a K/L score ≥2. The prevalence of radiographic hip OA was 18.4% and 14.4% in the baseline survey, and 16.0% and 10.7% in the fourth survey among men and women, respectively. Among the participants aged 40-69 years, the prevalence of radiographic hip OA was significantly lower during the fourth survey than during the baseline survey. Whereas, among elderly men aged 70-79 years, radiographic hip OA was significantly less prevalent during the baseline survey than during the fourth survey. From the logistic regression analysis results, radiographic hip OA was significantly less prevalent during the fourth survey than during the baseline survey (odds ratio: 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.65). At a 10-year interval, the prevalence of radiographic hip OA shows an improving trend.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36474937
doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100285
pii: S2665-9131(22)00053-X
pmc: PMC9718137
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100285Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Jan;24(1):117-23
pubmed: 26241774
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Sep;17(9):1137-43
pubmed: 19410032
J Bone Miner Metab. 2009;27(5):620-8
pubmed: 19568689
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
pubmed: 13498604
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;73(9):1659-64
pubmed: 23744977
Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;31(4):899-903
pubmed: 32857673
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Feb;28(2):182-188
pubmed: 31629024
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 May;50(5):1477-86
pubmed: 15146417
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Dec;25(12):2072-2079
pubmed: 28844568
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Aug;38(8):1134-41
pubmed: 7639811
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Nov;63(11):1427-33
pubmed: 15479891
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Apr;40(4):565-571
pubmed: 32072233
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):809-15
pubmed: 19286855
J Rheumatol. 2002 Oct;29(10):2185-95
pubmed: 12375331
Lancet. 2013 Nov 2;382(9903):1507-13
pubmed: 23849796
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;37(11):1193-7
pubmed: 9851268
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):1851-60
pubmed: 14555665
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1999 May;25(2):283-98, vi
pubmed: 10356418
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Dec;75(6):713-20
pubmed: 15762261
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):3013-7
pubmed: 25103598
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 23;17(15):
pubmed: 32717778
Rejuvenation Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):37-48
pubmed: 32498608
Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Apr;57(4):203-8
pubmed: 9709175
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 5;32(1):193-198
pubmed: 33719865
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Oct 03;10:1565-73
pubmed: 26491272
Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23
pubmed: 20392703
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;39(4):988-95
pubmed: 19749026
Lancet. 2013 Oct 26;382(9902):1405-12
pubmed: 23871492