Initial experience on abdominal photon-counting computed tomography in clinical routine: general image quality and dose exposure.
DNA damage
Dose reduction
Signal-to-noise ratio
Tomography
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
12
05
2022
accepted:
31
10
2022
revised:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
9
12
2022
medline:
21
3
2023
entrez:
8
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Photon-counting computed tomography has lately found its way into clinical routine. The new technique could offer substantial improvements regarding general image quality, image noise, and radiation dose reduction. This study evaluated the first abdominal examinations in clinical routine and compared the results to conventional computed tomography. In this single-center retrospective study, 66 patients underwent photon-counting and conventional abdominal CT. Four radiologists assessed general image quality, image noise, and image artifacts. Signal-to-noise ratio and dose properties of both techniques within the clinical application were compared. An ex vivo phantom study revealed the radiobiological impact by means of DNA double-strand break foci in peripheral blood cells by enumerating γ-H2AX+53BP1 foci. General image quality in accordance with the Likert scale was found superior for photon-counting CT (4.74 ± 0.46 vs. 4.25 ± 0.54; p < 0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio (p < 0.001) and also dose exposure were higher for photon-counting CT (DLP: 419.2 ± 162.2 vs. 372.3 ± 236.6 mGy*cm; p = 0.0435). CT exposure resulted in significantly increased DNA damage in comparison to sham control (p < 0.001). Investigation of the average foci per cell and radiation-induced foci numbers revealed significantly elevated numbers (p = 0.004 and p < 0.0001, respectively) after photon-counting CT. Photon-counting CT in abdominal examinations showed superior results regarding general image quality and signal-to-noise ratio in clinical routine. However, this seems to be traded for a significantly higher dose exposure and corresponding double-strand break frequency. Optimization of standard protocols in further clinical applications is required to find a compromise regarding picture quality and dose exposure. • Photon-counting computed tomography promises to enhance the diagnostic potential of medical imaging in clinical routine. • Retrospective single-center study showed superior general image quality accompanied by higher dose exposure in initial abdominal PCCT protocols compared to state-of-the-art conventional CT. • A simultaneous ex vivo phantom study revealed correspondingly increased frequencies of DNA double-strand breaks after PCCT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36477938
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09278-1
pii: 10.1007/s00330-022-09278-1
pmc: PMC10017564
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2461-2468Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2930-2936
pubmed: 34936011
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):706-14
pubmed: 19789225
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108909
pubmed: 32145600
J Radiol Prot. 2009 Mar;29(1):5-21
pubmed: 19225189
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:114-128
pubmed: 28583622
Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):688-94
pubmed: 24520943
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(4):555-569
pubmed: 28670151
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Apr;149:110229
pubmed: 35278927
Eur Radiol. 2011 Mar;21(3):510-7
pubmed: 21249371
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1495-9
pubmed: 21596504
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):612-9
pubmed: 21376494
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2014 Jul-Aug;9(4):259-67
pubmed: 24706609
Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):261-262
pubmed: 29944083
Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):520-31
pubmed: 19789227
Phys Med. 2020 Nov;79:126-136
pubmed: 33249223
Tomography. 2022 Jun 21;8(4):1642-1648
pubmed: 35894001
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):692-7
pubmed: 25654667
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):327-42
pubmed: 24761954
Invest Radiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):111-119
pubmed: 31770298
Rofo. 2019 Aug;191(8):739-751
pubmed: 30665250
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 8;11(1):12060
pubmed: 34103547
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Feb 07;12(2):
pubmed: 32046191
Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2 Suppl):S45-74
pubmed: 25340438
Acta Radiol. 2019 Jun;60(6):687-693
pubmed: 30200772
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):418-427
pubmed: 32181730
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Oct;201(4):W626-32
pubmed: 24059402
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 03;9(2):e87458
pubmed: 24498326
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;14(6):
pubmed: 35326696
Eur Radiol. 2011 Mar;21(3):627-35
pubmed: 21053003