Anterior surgical treatment for cervical degenerative radiculopathy: a prediction model for non-success.
Arm pain
Degenerative neck surgery
Neck disability
Outcome
Predictors
Prognostic model
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
03
08
2022
accepted:
23
11
2022
pubmed:
10
12
2022
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
9
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
By using data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery, we wanted to develop and validate prediction models for non-success in patients operated with anterior surgical techniques for cervical degenerative radiculopathy (CDR). This is a multicentre longitudinal study of 2022 patients undergoing CDR surgery and followed for 12 months to find prognostic models for non-success in neck disability and arm pain using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and a calibration test. Internal validation by bootstrapping re-sampling with 1000 repetitions was applied to correct for over-optimism. The clinical usefulness of the neck disability model was explored by developing a risk matrix for individual case examples. Thirty-eight percent of patients experienced non-success in neck disability and 35% in arm pain. Loss to follow-up was 35% for both groups. Predictors for non-success in neck disability were high physical demands in work, low level of education, pending litigation, previous neck surgery, long duration of arm pain, medium-to-high baseline disability score and presence of anxiety/depression. AUC was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75, 0.82). For the arm pain model, all predictors for non-success in neck disability, except for anxiety/depression, were found to be significant in addition to foreign mother tongue, smoking and medium-to-high baseline arm pain. AUC was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64, 0.72). The neck disability model showed high discriminative performance, whereas the arm pain model was shown to be acceptable. Based upon the models, individualized risk estimates can be made and applied in shared decision-making with patients referred for surgical assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36481873
doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05440-2
pii: 10.1007/s00701-022-05440-2
pmc: PMC9840586
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145-157Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001380
pubmed: 23393429
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1225-1235
pubmed: 28012081
Br J Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;33(6):613-619
pubmed: 31607163
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug 1;43(15):1025-1030
pubmed: 29215497
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):207-214
pubmed: 28604488
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 Feb;148(2):167-73; discussion 173
pubmed: 16341632
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jun 21;:1-11
pubmed: 31226684
Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov 19;8(6):e84140
pubmed: 30719418
Brain. 1994 Apr;117 ( Pt 2):325-35
pubmed: 8186959
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):3-15
pubmed: 31880083
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 27;5(1):1188
pubmed: 27516926
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):735-6
pubmed: 25984857
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):1715-22
pubmed: 23778373
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):824-828
pubmed: 28566404
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1413-1421
pubmed: 32502657
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S36-S40
pubmed: 32994304
Acta Orthop. 2011 Feb;82(1):56-63
pubmed: 21189113
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58
pubmed: 30596875
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90(3-4):127-35
pubmed: 3354360
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Feb;29(1):E34-42
pubmed: 24525748
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33
pubmed: 30596876
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1062-7
pubmed: 19230609
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 1;43(21):1455-1462
pubmed: 29579013
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 1;35(29):1925-31
pubmed: 24898551
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Nov 15;45(22):1541-1552
pubmed: 32796461
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):404-413
pubmed: 27421276
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381
pubmed: 23393430
J Neurosurg Sci. 2017 Feb;61(1):39-45
pubmed: 25215583
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;33(5):192-200
pubmed: 32271175
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28
pubmed: 25036218
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun 30;14(3):286-293
pubmed: 32699749
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7
pubmed: 25981519
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Oct 15;12(5):629-637
pubmed: 30364823
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Sep;104(5):581-584
pubmed: 29902639
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):282-286
pubmed: 26208938
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun 30;13(3):262-269
pubmed: 31328090
J Orthop. 2021 Jun 18;26:8-13
pubmed: 34220147
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Oct;19(4):403-11
pubmed: 23909550
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e1083-e1089
pubmed: 30415055
Neurosurgery. 2016 Jul;79(1):69-74
pubmed: 27166659
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e297
pubmed: 17941715
Global Spine J. 2016 Jun;6(4):306-13
pubmed: 27190731
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):144-148
pubmed: 34194160