Differences in fish herbivory among tropical and temperate seaweeds and annual patterns in kelp consumption influence the tropicalisation of temperate reefs.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 12 2022
08 12 2022
Historique:
received:
30
01
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
9
12
2022
pubmed:
10
12
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Climate change is leading to novel species interactions and profoundly altering ecosystems. In marine systems, tropical and subtropical species are increasing in higher latitudes. This has been linked to the deforestation of temperate coastlines, as direct effects of ocean warming combine with increased herbivory from tropical and sub-tropical fishes and lead to the decline of canopy-forming kelp. Here, we tested the hypothesis that this deforestation may be facilitated by greater palatability of temperate kelp and other canopy seaweeds compared to tropical taxa. We used multiple-choice filmed feeding field experiments and chemical analyses to measure the palatability of temperate and tropical seaweeds from Tosa Bay (southeastern Japan) and we used single-species feeding assays to measure changes in consumption of the kelp Ecklonia cava throughout the year. We found no evidence that temperate seaweeds are more palatable to herbivorous fish. In the multiple-choice assays, consumption was concentrated on both tropical and temperate Sargassum species, which are ephemeral and peak in abundance in the spring/early summer. Consumption of the kelp Ecklonia cava peaked during the autumn, when Sargassum species are absent. The highest levels of kelp herbivory coincide with the reproductive season for E. cava and may contribute to the long-term decline of these kelp forests in southern Japan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36482196
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24666-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-24666-9
pmc: PMC9731966
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21202Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Ecol Lett. 2012 Aug;15(8):912-22
pubmed: 22639820
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 4;115(36):8990-8995
pubmed: 30126981
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Oct;27(20):5262-5275
pubmed: 34308551
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13791-13796
pubmed: 27849585
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 03;8(12):e81107
pubmed: 24312528
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jul;18(7):714-23
pubmed: 25994785
Ecol Evol. 2012 Nov;2(11):2854-65
pubmed: 23170219
Ecology. 2017 Sep;98(9):2312-2321
pubmed: 28590557
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 11;7(1):820
pubmed: 28400614
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug;4(8):1044-1059
pubmed: 32451428
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20140846
pubmed: 25009065
Science. 2016 Nov 11;354(6313):
pubmed: 27846577
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):325-31
pubmed: 20392517
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jul;20(7):2221-9
pubmed: 24677405
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jun;27(11):2537-2548
pubmed: 33694271
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2020 Feb;240:110354
pubmed: 31647988
Science. 2017 Mar 31;355(6332):
pubmed: 28360268
Oecologia. 2004 Jan;138(1):1-4
pubmed: 14557867
Curr Biol. 2011 Nov 8;21(21):1828-32
pubmed: 22036178
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb;33(2):116-128
pubmed: 29173900
Oecologia. 1990 Sep;84(2):158-163
pubmed: 28312747
Oecologia. 1992 Jun;90(3):333-339
pubmed: 28313519
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 13;286(1896):20181887
pubmed: 30963929
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Oct;27(19):4771-4784
pubmed: 34268836
Oecologia. 1995 Aug;103(2):170-179
pubmed: 28306770