A case report involving the experience of pervasive pregnancy denial: detailed observation of the first 12 postpartum weeks.


Journal

BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 12 2022
Historique:
received: 19 05 2022
accepted: 08 11 2022
entrez: 10 12 2022
pubmed: 11 12 2022
medline: 15 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pervasive pregnancy denial is a rare condition associated with distress and unassisted delivery. The case involves a 38-year-old woman (NN), with two older children (ages 8 and 11), who was unaware, until delivery, that she had been pregnant. The case is discussed in the context of a 12-week observation of postpartum mood, stress, and mother-child attachment. NN and other 558 non-depressed women (mean age 32.41 years) were selected from the pool of participants in the RIPOD (risk of postpartum depression) study. All participants were recruited within 1-6 days of delivery. In addition to surveying depressed mood at childbirth, remote assessments of mood, mother-child attachment, and perceived stress were conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks postpartum. Every other day, the participants also reported their current perceived stress levels based on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high). During the entire period of postpartum observation, NN reported no symptoms on the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, similar to only 1.6% of the sample, no stress as 0.7% of the sample, and above-average mother-infant bonding akin to only 4.6% of the sample. Her daily stress levels showed no disturbance, which was the case for only 3.32% of the total sample. On the day of delivery, NN reported a stress level of 1 (the minimum possible level), which was reported by only 4.2% of the total sample. However, NN reported the experience of delivery to be traumatic given that the child had fallen to the floor. The experience of a denied pregnancy did not appear to disturb NN at any time point, not even on the day of delivery. Compared to NN, the other non-depressed participants reported wide fluctuations in stress levels during the observation period. NN did not report any risk factors for denied pregnancy. Thus, she belonged neither to any group of typical pregnancy deniers, as reported in the literature, nor to a typical postpartum group. We postulate, therefore, that the extent to which pregnancy denial can be deemed a normal variation, unrelated to a psychological or physiological condition, depends largely on personal traits.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Pervasive pregnancy denial is a rare condition associated with distress and unassisted delivery.
CASE PRESENTATION
The case involves a 38-year-old woman (NN), with two older children (ages 8 and 11), who was unaware, until delivery, that she had been pregnant. The case is discussed in the context of a 12-week observation of postpartum mood, stress, and mother-child attachment. NN and other 558 non-depressed women (mean age 32.41 years) were selected from the pool of participants in the RIPOD (risk of postpartum depression) study. All participants were recruited within 1-6 days of delivery. In addition to surveying depressed mood at childbirth, remote assessments of mood, mother-child attachment, and perceived stress were conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks postpartum. Every other day, the participants also reported their current perceived stress levels based on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high). During the entire period of postpartum observation, NN reported no symptoms on the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, similar to only 1.6% of the sample, no stress as 0.7% of the sample, and above-average mother-infant bonding akin to only 4.6% of the sample. Her daily stress levels showed no disturbance, which was the case for only 3.32% of the total sample. On the day of delivery, NN reported a stress level of 1 (the minimum possible level), which was reported by only 4.2% of the total sample. However, NN reported the experience of delivery to be traumatic given that the child had fallen to the floor.
CONCLUSION
The experience of a denied pregnancy did not appear to disturb NN at any time point, not even on the day of delivery. Compared to NN, the other non-depressed participants reported wide fluctuations in stress levels during the observation period. NN did not report any risk factors for denied pregnancy. Thus, she belonged neither to any group of typical pregnancy deniers, as reported in the literature, nor to a typical postpartum group. We postulate, therefore, that the extent to which pregnancy denial can be deemed a normal variation, unrelated to a psychological or physiological condition, depends largely on personal traits.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36494788
doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04377-1
pii: 10.1186/s12888-022-04377-1
pmc: PMC9732985
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

774

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 410314797

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jul 22;36:205
pubmed: 32963671
Matern Child Health J. 2005 Dec;9(4):413-20
pubmed: 16235025
Ceska Gynekol. 2016 Fall;81(5):355-368
pubmed: 27897022
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):121
pubmed: 33574229
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1996 Dec;30(6):861-3
pubmed: 9034478
BMJ. 2002 Feb 23;324(7335):458
pubmed: 11859048
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1980 Aug;62(2):177-90
pubmed: 7193399
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Apr;21(4):715-726
pubmed: 27449777
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Nov;81(11):1021-7
pubmed: 12421169
Child Abuse Negl. 1993 Jul-Aug;17(4):501-13
pubmed: 8402253
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2003 Mar-Apr;207(2):48-53
pubmed: 12740746
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2010 Spring;38(1):117-31
pubmed: 20297893
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4 Suppl):S1-3
pubmed: 21961818
Q Rev Biol. 2000 Jun;75(2):113-48
pubmed: 10858967
Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(2):250-8
pubmed: 16997498
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):723-30
pubmed: 17084153
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2022 Feb;25(1):51-59
pubmed: 34392438
Psychosomatics. 2015 Mar-Apr;56(2):119-28
pubmed: 25624179
Br J Psychiatry. 1989 Sep;155:356-62
pubmed: 2611547
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(5):542-6
pubmed: 17464581
J Perinat Med. 2003;31(1):29-35
pubmed: 12661141
BMJ Case Rep. 2014 May 29;2014:
pubmed: 24876214
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019 Feb;22(1):159-164
pubmed: 29796966
Birth. 1995 Dec;22(4):220-6
pubmed: 8573237
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021 Mar;125:105122
pubmed: 33421704
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2012 Jun;15(3):167-74
pubmed: 22426944
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Mar;49(2):127-136
pubmed: 32035973
Psychosomatics. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(2):117-22
pubmed: 17329604
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Mar;15(1):1-8
pubmed: 8038884
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 23;16:159
pubmed: 27216151
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):485-492
pubmed: 34324258
Metabolites. 2021 Nov 29;11(12):
pubmed: 34940573
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Jan;72(1):50-61
pubmed: 26370358
J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jul;11(3):521-42
pubmed: 9690191

Auteurs

Natalia Chechko (N)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. nchechko@ukaachen.de.
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine: JARA-Institute Brain Structure Function Relationship (INM 10), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany. nchechko@ukaachen.de.
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behavior (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, 52428, Jülich, Germany. nchechko@ukaachen.de.

Elena Losse (E)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Susanne Stickel (S)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. sstickel@ukaachen.de.
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine: JARA-Institute Brain Structure Function Relationship (INM 10), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany. sstickel@ukaachen.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH