Impact of FLT3-ITD Mutation Status and Its Ratio in a Cohort of 2901 Patients Undergoing Upfront Intensive Chemotherapy: A PETHEMA Registry Study.
FLT3–ITD mutation and ratio
acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
death
outcome
prognosis
real-world outcomes
relapse
survival
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Nov 2022
24 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
17
10
2022
revised:
04
11
2022
accepted:
21
11
2022
entrez:
11
12
2022
pubmed:
12
12
2022
medline:
12
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
FLT3−ITD results in a poor prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognostic usefulness of the allelic ratio (AR) to select post-remission therapy remains controversial. Our study focuses on the prognostic impact of FLT3−ITD and its ratio in a series of 2901 adult patients treated intensively in the pre-FLT3 inhibitor era and reported in the PETHEMA registry. A total of 579 of these patients (20%) harbored FLT3−ITD mutations. In multivariate analyses, patients with an FLT3−ITD allele ratio (AR) of >0.5 showed a lower complete remission (CR rate) and OS (HR 1.47, p = 0.009), while AR > 0.8 was associated with poorer RFS (HR 2.1; p < 0.001). Among NPM1/FLT3−ITD-mutated patients, median OS gradually decreased according to FLT3−ITD status and ratio (34.3 months FLT3−ITD-negative, 25.3 months up to 0.25, 14.5 months up to 0.5, and 10 months ≥ 0.5, p < 0.001). Post-remission allogeneic transplant (allo-HSCT) resulted in better OS and RFS as compared to auto-HSCT in NPM1/FLT3−ITD-mutated AML regardless of pre-established AR cutoff (≤0.5 vs. >0.5). Using the maximally selected log-rank statistics, we established an optimal cutoff of FLT3−ITD AR of 0.44 for OS, and 0.8 for RFS. We analyzed the OS and RFS according to FLT3−ITD status in all patients, and we found that the group of FLT3−ITD-positive patients with AR < 0.44 had similar 5-year OS after allo-HSCT or auto-HSCT (52% and 41%, respectively, p = 0.86), but worse RFS after auto-HSCT (p = 0.01). Among patients with FLT3−ITD AR > 0.44, allo-HSCT was superior to auto-HSCT in terms of OS and RFS. This study provides more evidence for a better characterization of patients with AML harboring FLT3−ITD mutations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36497281
pii: cancers14235799
doi: 10.3390/cancers14235799
pmc: PMC9737662
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Salud Carlos III
ID : PI19/01518 and PI19/00730
Références
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1903
pubmed: 29117486
Blood. 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1752-9
pubmed: 11535508
Leukemia. 2003 Sep;17(9):1738-52
pubmed: 12970773
Blood. 2001 Sep 15;98(6):1746-51
pubmed: 11535507
Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;125(7):1091-1100
pubmed: 30521114
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 15;21(24):4642-9
pubmed: 14673054
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 1;358(18):1909-18
pubmed: 18450602
Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2776-84
pubmed: 17957027
Oncogene. 2002 Apr 11;21(16):2555-63
pubmed: 11971190
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012 Oct;51(10):910-24
pubmed: 22674490
Blood. 2017 Feb 2;129(5):565-571
pubmed: 27872057
Blood. 2022 Sep 22;140(12):1345-1377
pubmed: 35797463
Blood Adv. 2018 Oct 23;2(20):2744-2754
pubmed: 30341082
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Apr;27(4):311.e1-311.e10
pubmed: 33836871
Blood. 1999 May 1;93(9):3074-80
pubmed: 10216104
Blood. 2013 Apr 4;121(14):2734-8
pubmed: 23377436
Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):2264-5; author reply 2265
pubmed: 17312001
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Mar;22(3):462-9
pubmed: 26551637
Blood. 2014 Nov 27;124(23):3441-9
pubmed: 25270908
Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4372-80
pubmed: 12393388
Cancer Res. 2001 Oct 1;61(19):7233-9
pubmed: 11585760
Blood. 2010 Jul 22;116(3):354-65
pubmed: 20385793
Leukemia. 2022 Jan;36(1):90-99
pubmed: 34316017
Blood. 2005 Nov 15;106(10):3658-65
pubmed: 16076872
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Dec;36(11):977-83
pubmed: 16184177
Blood. 2002 Jun 15;99(12):4326-35
pubmed: 12036858
Blood Cancer J. 2014 May 02;4:e208
pubmed: 24786392
Blood. 2002 Jul 1;100(1):59-66
pubmed: 12070009
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 19;14(8):e0220864
pubmed: 31425527