Clinical Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of a New Multiple-Action Eyedrop in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Dry Eye.

cross-linked hyaluronic acid dry eye disease liposomes osmolarity sterylamine trehalose

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 13 10 2022
revised: 14 11 2022
accepted: 22 11 2022
entrez: 11 12 2022
pubmed: 12 12 2022
medline: 12 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background: To assess the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of a new-generation ophthalmic solution containing cross-linked hyaluronic acid 0.15% trehalose 3%, liposomes 1% and sterylamine 0.25% (Trimix® Off Health Italia, Firenze, Italy) (CXHAL) versus trehalose 3% (Thealoz®, Thea Pharmaceuticals, Clermont-Ferrand, France) (TRS) in subjects with moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED). Patients and methods: In this prospective, observational cohort study, 41 subjects with moderate to severe dry eye were enrolled and divided into two age- and sex-matched groups. Group 1 was treated with CXHA eye drops, and group 2 was treated with TRS eye drops four times daily for 2 months. All subjects were evaluated at baseline (V0) and at day 60 ± 3 (V1). The examination comprised Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE). Tear osmolarity was evaluated using the TearLab Osmolarity System®; Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) was performed to assess tear meniscus height (TMH), fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT) and corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining and meibography; furthermore, slit lamp evaluation was performed for eyelid erythema and edema, conjunctival chemosis and hyperemia and Meibomian gland secretion quality. Results: All patients completed the treatment. BCVA remained stable in both groups, and no adverse events were reported. After 2 months, both groups showed statistically significant improvements for SANDE (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively), TBUT values (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and staining (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively) as compared to baseline values. Group 1 showed a statistically significant improvement in SANDE frequency and tear osmolarity (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas chemosis was significantly reduced in group 2. The amount of TBUT improvement was statistically higher in group 1 compared to that in group 2 (p = 0.041). Conclusion: A new-generation multiple-action ophthalmic solution was safe and clinically effective in the treatment of moderate and severe dry eye, with significant improvements in the main ocular surface parameters.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36498550
pii: jcm11236975
doi: 10.3390/jcm11236975
pmc: PMC9740530
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 01;18(5):
pubmed: 33804439
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;33(7):539-542
pubmed: 28557655
JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2114-9
pubmed: 11694152
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):334-365
pubmed: 28736337
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Apr 13;11:595-603
pubmed: 25926736
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;100(8):844-860
pubmed: 35514082
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Sep;35(7):381-387
pubmed: 31373862
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1441-1447
pubmed: 35567735
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;33(9):647-661
pubmed: 28956698
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 20;12:1293-1300
pubmed: 30050282
Biomolecules. 2020 May 25;10(5):
pubmed: 32466265
Acta Pharm. 2019 Dec 1;69(4):621-634
pubmed: 31639085
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Nov 01;8(6):2
pubmed: 31695963
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Feb 03;13(2):
pubmed: 33546193
Ocul Surf. 2007 Apr;5(2):75-92
pubmed: 17508116
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;105(4):446-453
pubmed: 32703782
Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:577-81
pubmed: 21654884
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 07;378(23):2212-2223
pubmed: 29874529
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):409-15
pubmed: 17317388
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283
pubmed: 28736335
Ophthalmology. 2003 Jun;110(6):1096-101
pubmed: 12799232
Ocul Surf. 2013 Oct;11(4):246-58
pubmed: 24112228
Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun;105(6):1114-9
pubmed: 9627665
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 29;18(7):
pubmed: 28661456
Polymers (Basel). 2018 Apr 11;10(4):
pubmed: 30966460

Auteurs

Anna Maria Roszkowska (AM)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, 30-705 Krakow, Poland.

Leandro Inferrera (L)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Eye Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Health, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Rosaria Spinella (R)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

Elisa Imelde Postorino (EI)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

Romana Gargano (R)

Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

Giovanni Wiliam Oliverio (GW)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

Pasquale Aragona (P)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

Classifications MeSH