Type 1 Tympanoplasty Outcomes between Cartilage and Temporal Fascia Grafts: A Long-Term Retrospective Study.
cartilage
fascia
graft
myringoplasty
perforation
tympanoplasty
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Nov 2022
26 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
29
09
2022
revised:
13
11
2022
accepted:
25
11
2022
entrez:
11
12
2022
pubmed:
12
12
2022
medline:
12
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: To compare the functional and anatomical results of two different types of grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty (TPL I). Methods: A retrospective comparative bicentric study was conducted on patients treated with TPL I using temporal fascia or tragal cartilage. We evaluated the functional and anatomical results with intergroup and intragroup analyses. Variables predicting long-term success were also evaluated. Results: A total of 142 patients (98 fascia graft vs. 44 cartilage) were initially assessed, with a mean follow-up of 67.1 ± 3.2 months. No significant differences were observed between the two groups on the intergroup analysis of age, gender, ear side, or pre-operative hearing data (all p > 0.05). At the intragroup analysis of auditory outcomes, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in post-operative air conduction, with greater gain for the fascia group at 6 months follow-up (p < 0.001 for both); however, at long-term follow-up, cartilage demonstrated better stability results (p < 0.001). When comparing the pre-and post-operative air-bone-gap (ABG), both groups showed a significant gain (p < 0.001); the fascia group showed that at 6 months, a greater ABG increase was found, but the difference was not statistically significant (4.9 ± 0.9 dB vs. 5.3 ± 1.2 dB; p = 0.04). On the contrary, the cartilage group at long-term follow-up at 5 years maintained greater outcomes (10 ± 1.6 dB vs. 6.4 ± 2 dB; p < 0.001). Lower age (F = 4.591; p = 0.036) and higher size of perforation (F = 4.820; p = 0.030) were predictors of long-term functional success. Conclusions: The graft material selection should consider several factors influencing the surgical outcome. At long-term follow-up, the use of a cartilage graft could result in more stable audiological outcomes, especially in younger patients or in case of wider perforations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36498572
pii: jcm11237000
doi: 10.3390/jcm11237000
pmc: PMC9740685
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014 Oct;41(5):422-7
pubmed: 24925703
Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):796-9
pubmed: 25115537
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009 Aug;118(8):570-4
pubmed: 19746755
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Jan;129(1):16-22
pubmed: 25602596
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Apr;124(4):312-6
pubmed: 25358610
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep;264(9):985-9
pubmed: 17401572
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1982 Nov;15(4):861-7
pubmed: 7162823
Am J Otol. 1993 May;14(3):301-5
pubmed: 8372930
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1985;242(1):27-33
pubmed: 4038148
J Biomech. 2013 May 31;46(9):1592-5
pubmed: 23598065
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Nov 19;:1455613211056554
pubmed: 34797992
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jul;33(5):699-705
pubmed: 22643445
J Laryngol Otol. 1955 Oct;69(10):637-52
pubmed: 13263770
J Laryngol Otol. 1997 Jun;111(6):517-20
pubmed: 9231083
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Oct;45(5):985-993
pubmed: 29551206
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(11):2803-13
pubmed: 23321796
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980 Jul-Aug;89(4 Pt 1):331-4
pubmed: 7416683
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Sep - Oct;40(5):735-742
pubmed: 31296351
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999 Apr;24(2):126-9
pubmed: 10225158
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Aug;120(8):535-41
pubmed: 21922978
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):471-4
pubmed: 21267588
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1995 Jun;20(3):241-5
pubmed: 7554337
Am J Otol. 1998 May;19(3):301-5
pubmed: 9596179
Laryngoscope. 2007 Apr;117(4):725-30
pubmed: 17415145
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Nov;136(11):1085-1090
pubmed: 27310768
Laryngoscope. 1999 Jan;109(1):47-51
pubmed: 9917039
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Jun;47(3):377-382
pubmed: 31983479
AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1951 Dec;54(6):666-74
pubmed: 14877373
Laryngoscope. 2017 Sep;127(9):2139-2148
pubmed: 27933630
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jul;23(4):e280-3
pubmed: 22801150
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jun;31(4):589-95
pubmed: 20418792
J Int Adv Otol. 2017 Apr;13(1):14-20
pubmed: 28555595
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;138:110260
pubmed: 32705993
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126(7):1662-70
pubmed: 26542167
Acta Otolaryngol. 1982 May-Jun;93(5-6):441-6
pubmed: 7102300
J Laryngol Otol. 1981 Jul;95(7):667-73
pubmed: 7252345
Am J Otol. 1995 Jul;16(4):532-5
pubmed: 8588656
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Jan;126(1):22-5
pubmed: 22032518