Influence of Diminished Ovarian Reserve on Early Embryo Morphokinetics during In Vitro Fertilization: A Time-Lapse Study.

diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) morphokinetic assessment ovarian aging time-lapse imaging

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 17 10 2022
revised: 18 11 2022
accepted: 28 11 2022
entrez: 11 12 2022
pubmed: 12 12 2022
medline: 12 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is great controversy as to whether women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR) exhibit only a quantitative decrease in ovarian reserve or also impaired oocyte and embryo quality. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of DOR on embryo morphokinetic parameters with a time-lapse system. 1314 embryos were obtained from 256 couples undergoing IVF or ICSI cycles, with 242 embryos in the DOR group as classified by the Bologna and POSEIDON criteria and 1072 embryos derived from the Normal Ovarian Reserve (NOR) group. For each morphokinetic parameter (t2, t3, t4, t5, t8, tB, ECC2, cc2a, ECC3, s2, s3), a generalized linear mixed model was created to control for female age, BMI, smoking status, method of insemination and correlation between oocytes from a same cohort. No significant association was found between DOR and any of the morphokinetic parameters studied. In a secondary analysis, we evaluated the influence of maternal aging, comparing morphokinetic characteristics between two age groups (<37 and ≥37 years). In the univariate analysis, we found that embryos from older women displayed a slower embryo development (in particular for t3, t4, t5, tB, and ECC2), although without statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. In conclusion, our study did not reveal any substantial impact of ovarian aging on early morphokinetic parameters and suggested potential biases that may be a source of controversy in the literature.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36498746
pii: jcm11237173
doi: 10.3390/jcm11237173
pmc: PMC9736490
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Nov 1;105(11):
pubmed: 32770239
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24
pubmed: 21505041
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):656-663.e1
pubmed: 24355045
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1115-1122
pubmed: 33638032
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2017 Aug 30;63(8):84-92
pubmed: 28886319
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Oct;16(4):3179-3185
pubmed: 30214541
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0166398
pubmed: 27907016
Hum Reprod. 2004 Jul;19(7):1612-7
pubmed: 15205396
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2245-54
pubmed: 27591227
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):2010-2017
pubmed: 30272168
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):324-31
pubmed: 26637491
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):688-701
pubmed: 24821925
Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;19(2):127-132
pubmed: 30940450
Fertil Steril. 2021 Apr;115(4):1014-1022
pubmed: 33461751
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 19;15(11):e0242377
pubmed: 33211770
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jul 1;110(1):113-121
pubmed: 29908770
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Sep;37(3):304-313
pubmed: 30314885
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):469-74
pubmed: 24581984
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Oct;43(4):627-636
pubmed: 34474978
Reprod Med Biol. 2015 Nov 23;15(3):127-136
pubmed: 29259429
Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):e9-e17
pubmed: 25585505
Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2658-71
pubmed: 21828117
Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep;104(3):612-19.e3
pubmed: 26049057
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;296(3):583-587
pubmed: 28669060
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2002 Dec 11;51(1):1-13
pubmed: 12564162
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Sep 22;7:101
pubmed: 19772632
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Oct 25;10:686
pubmed: 31708867
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Nov;22(6):725-743
pubmed: 27562289
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017 Sep;33(9):733-736
pubmed: 28412866
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3
pubmed: 26921622
Hum Reprod. 1996 Jul;11(7):1484-6
pubmed: 8671489
Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2650-60
pubmed: 25344070
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Jun 29;9:327
pubmed: 30008696
J Endocrinol. 2016 Jul;230(1):F1-6
pubmed: 27154334
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011 Feb 07;9:23
pubmed: 21299886
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jul;23(7):1633-8
pubmed: 18441345
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jun;101(6):1637-48.e1-5
pubmed: 24726214
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2019 Sep;46(3):119-124
pubmed: 31220913
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4286528
pubmed: 28097133
Fertil Steril. 2012 Dec;98(6):1458-63
pubmed: 22925687
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 May;34(5):455-462
pubmed: 28319017

Auteurs

Lisa Boucret (L)

Reproductive Biology Unit, Angers University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.

Léa Tramon (L)

Reproductive Biology Unit, Angers University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.

Jérémie Riou (J)

Delegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.

Véronique Ferré-L'Hôtellier (V)

Reproductive Biology Unit, Angers University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.

Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet (PE)

Department of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.
MITOVASC, INSERM 1083, CNRS 6015, Angers University, 49000 Angers, France.

Pascale May-Panloup (P)

Reproductive Biology Unit, Angers University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.
MITOVASC, INSERM 1083, CNRS 6015, Angers University, 49000 Angers, France.

Classifications MeSH