Influence of dental prophylaxis procedures on the tooth veneer interface in resin-based composite and polymer-infiltrated ceramic veneer restorations: an in vitro study.
Air polishing
Interface
Surface analysis
Ultrasonic scaling
Veneer
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
13
06
2022
accepted:
30
11
2022
medline:
15
6
2023
pubmed:
12
12
2022
entrez:
11
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of dental prophylaxis cleaning procedures and artificial aging on veneers in human teeth. The external marginal and internal tooth veneer as well as the restoration surfaces were examined. Thirty-two extracted premolars were restored with resin-based composite (RBC) and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) veneers. Artificial aging by alternating thermocycling and subsequent prophylaxis procedure (glycine-based powder air polishing or ultrasonic scaling) was conducted for five consecutive cycles. The external marginal interface was examined by height profile measurements and the internal interface was investigated using micro X-ray computed tomography. In addition, the surface texture of the veneer surface was analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The application of both prophylaxis procedures resulted in a deepening of the marginal interface (10 µm ± 8 µm) for materials. Furthermore, the internal interface of PICN restorations showed marginal gaps after both treatments and artificial aging (16 µm ± 3 µm). In contrast to the RBC specimens, a significant increase in surface roughness was identified for PICN veneers after ultrasonic scaling. The marginal and internal interface regions in veneers fabricated from PICN and RBC were affected by prophylaxis procedures. Furthermore, it may result in increased veneer surface roughness, especially in PICN and after ultrasonic scaling, which might affect bioadhesion and longevity. After dental prophylaxis procedures, examination of the marginal and the internal interface as well as the veneer surface provides a precise insight into damage mechanisms and offers an assessment of longevity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36502509
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04816-z
pii: 10.1007/s00784-022-04816-z
pmc: PMC10264478
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polymers
0
Composite Resins
0
Dental Materials
0
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2595-2607Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Bartlett D, O’Toole S (2019) Tooth wear and aging. Aust Dent J 64:S59–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12681
doi: 10.1111/adj.12681
pubmed: 31144323
Van’tSpijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM et al (2009) Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 22:35–42
Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME (2003) Minimally invasive dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association 134:87–95. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0021
Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC (2018) CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth. J Dent Res 97:1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518779759
doi: 10.1177/0022034518779759
pubmed: 29906206
Mainjot AKJ (2020) The One step-No prep technique: A straightforward and minimally invasive approach for full-mouth rehabilitation of worn dentition using polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) CAD-CAM prostheses. J Esthet Restor Dent 32:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12432
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12432
pubmed: 30367707
Schlichting LH, Resende TH, Reis KR et al (2016) Simplified treatment of severe dental erosion with ultrathin CAD-CAM composite occlusal veneers and anterior bilaminar veneers. J Prosthet Dent 116:474–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.013
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.013
pubmed: 27132785
Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC et al (2016) From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks. J Dent Res 95:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286
doi: 10.1177/0022034516634286
pubmed: 26933136
Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN et al (2011) Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent 105:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60035-8
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60035-8
pubmed: 21458646
Moshaverinia A (2020) Review of the modern dental ceramic restorative materials for esthetic dentistry in the minimally invasive age. Dent Clin North Am 64:621–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2020.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2020.05.002
pubmed: 32888512
Mainjot AKJ, Charavet C (2020) Orthodontic-assisted one step- no prep technique: a straightforward and minimally-invasive approach for localized tooth wear treatment using polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD-CAM prostheses. J Esthet Restor Dent 32:645–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12630
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12630
pubmed: 32776711
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ (2014) Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 93:1232–1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
doi: 10.1177/0022034514553976
pubmed: 25344335
pmcid: 4462808
Oudkerk J, Eldafrawy M, Bekaert S et al (2020) The one-step no-prep approach for full-mouth rehabilitation of worn dentition using PICN CAD-CAM restorations: 2-yr results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent 92:103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103245
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103245
pubmed: 31747585
Ludovichetti FS, Trindade FZ, Werner A et al (2018) Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent 120:318.e1-318.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.011
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.011
pubmed: 30097264
Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO (2016) Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater 32:e275–e283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
pubmed: 27639808
Hensel F, Koenig A, Doerfler H-M et al (2021) CAD/CAM resin-based composites for use in long-term temporary fixed dental prostheses. Polymers (Basel) 13:3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203469
doi: 10.3390/polym13203469
pubmed: 34685228
Sugiyama T, Kameyama A, Enokuchi T, et al. (2017) Effect of professional dental prophylaxis on the surface gloss and roughness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Clin Exp Dent 9(6):e772–e778. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53826
Jotikasthira NE, Lie T, Leknes KN (1992) Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments. J Clin Periodontol 19:560–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00684.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00684.x
pubmed: 1447381
Bühler J, Amato M, Weiger R et al (2016) A systematic review on the effects of air polishing devices on oral tissues. Int J Dent Hygiene 14:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12120
doi: 10.1111/idh.12120
Lee J-H, Kim S-H, Han J-S et al (2019) Effects of ultrasonic scaling on the optical properties and surface characteristics of highly translucent CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials: an in vitro study. Ceram Int 45:14594–14601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.177
doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.177
Anselme K, Davidson P, Popa AM et al (2010) The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater 6:3824–3846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001
pubmed: 20371386
Schubert A, Wassmann T, Holtappels M et al (2019) Predictability of microbial adhesion to dental materials by roughness parameters. Coatings 9:456. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9070456
doi: 10.3390/coatings9070456
Andrei M, Pirvu C, Demetrescu I (2014) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in understanding the influence of ultrasonic dental scaling on the dental structure-dental filling interface. Eur J Oral Sci 122:411–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12156
doi: 10.1111/eos.12156
pubmed: 25371134
Janiszewska-Olszowska J, J, Drozdzik A, Tandecka K, et al (2020) Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders. BMC Oral Health 20:263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1007-y
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1007-y
Yazigi C, Schneider H, Chaar MS et al (2018) Effects of artificial aging and progression of cracks on thin occlusal veneers using SD-OCT. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 88:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.017
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.017
pubmed: 30193181
Blunck U, Fischer S, Hajtó J et al (2020) Ceramic laminate veneers: effect of preparation design and ceramic thickness on fracture resistance and marginal quality in vitro. Clin Oral Invest 24:2745–2754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03136-z
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03136-z
Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Jansen K et al (2019) Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: up to 10-year findings. J Dent 86:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.001
pubmed: 31181242
Dias MCR, Martins JNR, Chen A et al (2018) Prognosis of indirect composite resin cuspal coverage on endodontically treated premolars and molars: an in vivo prospective study. J Prosthodont 27:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12545
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12545
pubmed: 27662604
Elbadawy AA, Elaziz MHA, Alnazzawi AA et al (2021) Effect of various digital cement space settings on the adaptation of CAD/CAM occlusal veneer “micro-ct evaluation.” Dent Mater J 40:625–630. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-226
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-226
pubmed: 33390385
Papadopoulos K, Pahinis K, Saltidou K et al (2020) Evaluation of the surface characteristics of dental CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments. Materials 13:981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040981
doi: 10.3390/ma13040981
pubmed: 32098305
pmcid: 7078785
Strasser T, Preis V, Behr M et al (2018) Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment. Clin Oral Invest 22:2787–2797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6
Straface A, Rupp L, Gintaute A et al (2019) HF etching of CAD/CAM materials: influence of HF concentration and etching time on shear bond strength. Head Face Med 15:127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0206-8
doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0206-8
Matzinger M, Hahnel S, Preis V et al (2019) Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Invest 23:725–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3
Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R et al (2015) A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements. Dent Mater 31:855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.015
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.015
pubmed: 25998485
PD ISO/TS 11405:2015, Dentistry. Testing of adhesion to tooth structure, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
pubmed: 10071465
Shimizu Y, Tada K, Seki H et al (2014) Effects of air polishing on the resin composite–dentin interface. Odontology 102:279–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0111-8
doi: 10.1007/s10266-013-0111-8
pubmed: 23575885
Gartenmann SJ, Thurnheer T, Attin T et al (2017) Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal. Clin Oral Invest 21:1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1854-8
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1854-8
ISO 25178–1:2016, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - surface texture: areal - Part 1: Indication of surface texture, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Etxeberria M, Escuin T, Vinas M et al (2015) Useful surface parameters for biomaterial discrimination. Scanning 37:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21232
doi: 10.1002/sca.21232
pubmed: 26148576
ISO 25178–2:2012, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - surface texture: areal - Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Fuchs F, Koenig A, Poppitz D et al (2020) Application of macro photography in dental materials science. J Dent 102:103495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103495
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103495
pubmed: 33038439
Koenig A (2020) Analysis of air voids in cementitious materials using micro X-ray computed tomography (µXCT). Constr Build Mater 244:118313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118313
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118313
Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M (2013) Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent 15:181–190. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28883
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28883
pubmed: 23534025
Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M et al (2014) Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013
pubmed: 24135128
Al-Harbi FA, Ayad NM, ArRejaie AS et al (2017) Effect of aging regimens on resin nanoceramic chairside CAD/CAM material. J Prosthodont 26:432–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12408
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12408
pubmed: 26662793
Ducke VM, Ilie N (2021) Aging behavior of high-translucent CAD/CAM resin-based composite blocks. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 115:104269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104269
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104269
pubmed: 33341738
Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M et al (2014) Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 33:705–710. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-208
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-208
pubmed: 25273052
Haak R, Siegner J, Ziebolz D et al (2021) OCT evaluation of the internal adaptation of ceramic veneers depending on preparation design and ceramic thickness. Dent Mater 37:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.021
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.021
pubmed: 33288325
Sarr M, Mine A, De Munck J et al (2010) Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin. Clin Oral Investig 14(5):569–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0327-8
doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0327-8
pubmed: 19705169
De Kok P, de Jager N, Veerman IA (2016) Effect of a retention groove on the shear bond strength of dentin-bonded restorations. J Prosthet Dent 116(3):382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.032
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.032
pubmed: 27112414
Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N et al (2014) The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 30(9):954–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.018
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.018
pubmed: 25037897
Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM et al (2014) Effect of thickness of bonded composite resin on compressive strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 37:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.008
pubmed: 24880567
Schmohl L, Roesner A, Fuchs F et al (2022) Acid resistance of CAD/CAM resin composites. Biomedicines 10(6):1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061383
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061383
pubmed: 35740405
pmcid: 9220078
Ustun S, Ayaz EA (2021) Effect of different cement systems and aging on the bond strength of chairside CAD-CAM ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 125:334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.025
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.025
pubmed: 32122650
De Kok P, Kleverland CJ, Kuijs RH et al (2018) Influence of dentin and enamel on the fracture resistance of restorations at several thicknesses. Am J Dent 31(1):34–38
pubmed: 29630803
Lobauer U (2010) dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? – Properties, limitations and future trends. Materials 3(1):76–96. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3010076
doi: 10.3390/ma3010076
Koenig A, Schmohl L, Scheffler J et al (2021) Is Micro X-ray computer tomography a suitable non-destructive method for the characterisation of dental materials? Polymers (Basel) 13:1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081271
doi: 10.3390/polym13081271
pubmed: 33919864
Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I et al (2018) Does artificial aging affect mechanical properties of CAD/CAM composite materials. J Prosthodont Res 62:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.001
pubmed: 28647224
Song F, Koo H, Ren D (2015) Effects of material properties on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. J Dent Res 94:1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515587690
doi: 10.1177/0022034515587690
pubmed: 26001706
Bollen CML, Papaioanno W, van Eldere J et al (1996) The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x
pubmed: 9151584
Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M (1997) Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 13:258–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
pubmed: 11696906
Teughels W, van Assche N, Sliepen I et al (2006) Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
pubmed: 16968383
Zheng S, Bawazir M, Dhall A et al (2021) Implication of surface properties, bacterial motility, and hydrodynamic conditions on bacterial surface sensing and their initial adhesion. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.643722
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.643722