A survey of organizational structure and operational practices of elite youth football academies and national federations from around the world: A performance and medical perspective.
decision-making
innovation
knowledge management
player development
process management
research
strategy
Journal
Frontiers in sports and active living
ISSN: 2624-9367
Titre abrégé: Front Sports Act Living
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101765780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
accepted:
02
11
2022
entrez:
12
12
2022
pubmed:
13
12
2022
medline:
13
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical and performance units are integral components of player development programmes in elite football academies. Nevertheless, the nature of the operational processes implemented by practitioners within clubs and national federations remains unexplored. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to survey elite youth professional football academies from around the world regarding the operational processes adopted by their medical and performance units. Of the 50 organizations invited, 10 national federations and 25 clubs took part in the survey resulting in a response rate of 70% (95% confidence interval, 56%-81%). The respondents represented three groups: senior club and academy management, performance, and medical staff. The majority (60%-90%) of clubs and national federations reported strategic alignment between senior and academy medical and performance units as well as between academy medical and performance units. Survey responses indicated substantial heterogeneity in the composition and number of medical and performance professionals employed in academies. The majority of respondents agreed their medical and performance departments were effective in utilizing staff knowledge and external sources of knowledge to inform their practice (56%-80%). Performance staff (40%-50%) and physiotherapists (30%-32%) were deemed most influential in injury prevention programmes. During the return-to-play process, the influence of specific practitioners in the medical and performance units was dependent upon the phase of return-to-play. Shared decision-making was common practice amongst performance and medical staff in injury prevention and return-to-play processes. Medical and performance data were generally centralized across the first team and academy in majority (50%-72%) of clubs and national federations. Data were integrated within the same data management system to a higher degree in clubs (68%) vs. national federations (40%). Research and development activity were reported for most academies (50%-72%), and generally led by the head of performance (37%) or team doctor (21%). Research activities were largely undertaken Collectively, these findings provide a detailed overview regarding key operational processes delivered by medical and performance practitioners working in elite football academies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36506723
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1031721
pmc: PMC9727309
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1031721Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Gregson, Carling, Gualtieri, O'Brien, Reilly, Tavares, Bonanno, Lopez, Marques, Lolli and Salvo.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors WG, DB, EL, LL, and VS were employed by the company Aspire Academy. Author AG was employed by the company Juventus FC. Author JO'B was employed by the company Red Bull Athlete Performance Center. Author PR was employed by the company Premier League. Author FT was employed by the company Sporting Clube de Portugal. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(5):304-308
pubmed: 30104210
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2021 Aug;35(3):147-153
pubmed: 34225378
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;50(12):725-30
pubmed: 26795611
J Sports Sci. 2020 Jun - Jun;38(11-12):1269-1278
pubmed: 32378447
J Sci Med Sport. 2006 May;9(1-2):3-9; discussion 10
pubmed: 16616614
Sports Med. 2020 Apr;50(4):689-702
pubmed: 31741293
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Nov;21(11):1579-1587
pubmed: 33096969
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(7):523-31
pubmed: 24620040
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Mar;19(2):147-155
pubmed: 30009684
Sports Med. 2020 Sep;50(9):1653-1666
pubmed: 32185630
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;50(12):710-2
pubmed: 27252168
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1311-5
pubmed: 26036678
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(15):1008-1010
pubmed: 28343160
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(13):843-51
pubmed: 26084524
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):544-546
pubmed: 30702360
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jul;12(6):717-718
pubmed: 28832264
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;54(7):421-426
pubmed: 31182429
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(18):1352-7
pubmed: 24837243
Inj Prev. 2017 Dec;23(6):423-427
pubmed: 28039181
Clin J Sport Med. 2010 Sep;20(5):379-85
pubmed: 20818198
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016 Jan 04;2(1):e000075
pubmed: 27900158
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):853-64
pubmed: 27226389
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jan;20(1):26-31
pubmed: 27293086
Sports Med. 2014 Sep;44(9):1305-18
pubmed: 24986117
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jun 28;4:882516
pubmed: 35847452
Sports Med Open. 2022 Apr 13;8(1):52
pubmed: 35416633
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):389-402
pubmed: 21259156