OF spine classification of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures by MRI and conventional radiographs only leads to high inter-observer agreement rates-an additional CT adds limited information for the of classification and the OF score.
CT
MRI
OF spine classification
OF spine score
Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Dec 2022
12 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
10
06
2022
accepted:
05
12
2022
entrez:
12
12
2022
pubmed:
13
12
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the accuracy of classifying osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (OVBF). A retrospective analysis of a prospective single-center database has been performed. All consecutive patients who had suffered an acute thoracolumbar OVBF in one level II spine center between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed. Thereby, fractures of type OF 1 and OF 5 were excluded. All fractures were initially classified by 5 board-certified orthopaedic surgeons based on MRI and conventional radiographs. Afterwards a reclassification including CT scans were performed. Differences in OF classification and OF score values between both measurements were analyzed. A total of 61 patients were analyzed with a mean age 75.8 years (SD: 8.8 years). In 82.9% of the cases, there was no difference in OF classification comparing classification based only on MRI versus MRI + CT. A difference of more than two OF types was observed in less than 1% of all ratings. The inter-rater reliabilities of the OF classification based on CT + MRI and MRI alone were 0.63 and 0.49, respectively. In 97.5% of the cases there was no therapy-relevant difference of the treatment recommendation with respect of a surgical or nonoperative treatment recommendation based on the OF score. In terms of the OF classification and the OF score, the addition of CT add limited value compared to conventional radiographs and MRI only. Additionally, there is only a minor rate of disagreement in treatment recommendations when adding a CT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36510215
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06056-4
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-06056-4
pmc: PMC9743708
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1086Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Spine J. 2011 Aug;20 Suppl 3:390-6
pubmed: 21779855
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(2 Suppl):34S-45S
pubmed: 30210959
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jan;74(1):147-50
pubmed: 1732246
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(2 Suppl):50S-55S
pubmed: 30210962
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Jan;110(4):52-7
pubmed: 23413388
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e711-e716
pubmed: 34798342
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(2 Suppl):46S-49S
pubmed: 30210960
Eur Spine J. 2009 Sep;18(9):1287-92
pubmed: 19504131
Unfallchirurg. 2019 Aug;122(8):654-661
pubmed: 31053924
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Aug;16(7):1385-92
pubmed: 7484620
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Oct 8;118(40):670-677
pubmed: 34342263
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571