Effects on heavy menstrual bleeding and pregnancy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) or myomectomy for women with uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy: The FEMME randomized controlled trial.
United Kingdom
female
myomectomy
ovarian reserve
pregnancy rate
quality of life
uterine artery embolization
uterine fibroid
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
revised:
13
11
2022
received:
14
07
2022
accepted:
09
12
2022
pubmed:
14
12
2022
medline:
20
1
2023
entrez:
13
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine treatment options (myomectomy vs. uterine artery embolization (UAE)) for women wishing to avoid hysterectomy. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted on 254 women and data were collected on fibroid-specific quality of life (UFS-QOL), loss of menstrual blood, and pregnancy. At 4 years, the mean difference in the UFS-QOL was 5.0 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.4 to 11.5; P = 0.13) in favor of myomectomy. This was not statistically significant as it was at 2 years. There were no differences in bleeding scores, rates of amenorrhea, or heavy bleeding. Of those who were still menstruating, the majority reported regular or fairly regular periods: 36 of 48 (75%) in the UAE group and 30 of 39 (77%) in the myomectomy group. Twelve women after UAE and six women after myomectomy became pregnant (4 years) with seven and five live births, respectively (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.18-1.28). There was no difference between the levels of hormones associated with the uterine reserve in each group. Leiomyoma are common in reproductive-aged women, causing heavy menses and subfertility. Among women with uterine fibroids, myomectomy resulted in better fibroid-related quality of life at 4 years, compared with UAE but the treatments decreased menstrual bleeding equally. There was also no significant difference in the impact of treatment on ovarian reserve.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36511801
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14626
pmc: PMC10107788
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
492-501Subventions
Organisme : UK National Institute of Health Research
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1438-1455.e2
pubmed: 28641997
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):319.e1-319.e20
pubmed: 23891629
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 26;(12):CD005073
pubmed: 25541260
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015 Mar 31;5:18
pubmed: 25883858
BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1501-1512
pubmed: 28296146
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):492-501
pubmed: 36511801
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):440-451
pubmed: 32726530
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1011-7
pubmed: 20570178
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 4;10(1):240
pubmed: 28676073
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;9:849660
pubmed: 35360731
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;2016:2789201
pubmed: 28163718
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Aug;97(8):734-9
pubmed: 2400752
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):73-85
pubmed: 17943348
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300
pubmed: 11814511
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2021 Nov 20;13:100139
pubmed: 34877531
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):324-30
pubmed: 19361799
Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2010 Jul-Sep;6(3):e27
pubmed: 21611045
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):1065-1072
pubmed: 29016496
Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Sep-Oct;13(5):465-76
pubmed: 17584819
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1793-1802
pubmed: 34053154
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):91
pubmed: 35105342
Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4):1215-23
pubmed: 18339376
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):194-9
pubmed: 23942040
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):490-6
pubmed: 21354820
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):530-6
pubmed: 21773858