Cognitive aids in the management of clinical emergencies: a systematic review.
algorithms
checklist
decision aids
emergencies
patient safety
Journal
Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
accepted:
22
11
2022
pubmed:
16
12
2022
medline:
9
2
2023
entrez:
15
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical emergencies can be defined as unpredictable events that necessitate immediate intervention. Safety critical industries have acknowledged the difficulties of responding to such crises. Strategies to improve human performance and mitigate its limitations include the provision and use of cognitive aids, a family of tools that includes algorithms, checklists and decision aids. This systematic review evaluates the usefulness of cognitive aids in clinical emergencies. Following a systematic search of the electronic databases, we included 13 randomised controlled trials, reported in 16 publications. Each compared cognitive aids with usual care in the context of an anaesthetic, medical, surgical or trauma emergency involving adults. Most trials used only clinicians in the development and testing of the cognitive aids, and only some trials provided familiarisation with the cognitive aids before they were deployed. The primary outcome was the completeness of care delivered to the patient. Cognitive aids were associated with a reduction in the incidence of missed care steps from 43.3% to 11% (RR (95%CI) 0.29 (0.15-0.16); p < 0.001), and the quality of evidence was rated as moderate. The use of cognitive aids was related to decreases in the incidence of errors, increases in the rate of correctly performed steps and improvement in the clinical teamwork skills scores, non-technical skills scores, subjective conflict resolution scores and the global assessment of team performance. Cognitive aids had an inconsistent influence on the time to first intervention and time to complete care of the patient's condition. It is possible that this was a reflection of how common or rare the crisis in question was as well as the experience and expertise of the clinicians and team. Sufficient thought should be applied to the development of the content and design of cognitive aids, with consideration of the pre-existing guideline ecosystem. Cognitive aids should be tested before their deployment with adequate clinician and team training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36517981
doi: 10.1111/anae.15939
pmc: PMC10107924
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
343-355Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
Références
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 May 30;17(1):72
pubmed: 28558697
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1341-1350
pubmed: 31425259
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1848-53
pubmed: 23863753
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1480-90
pubmed: 27115264
Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):218-25
pubmed: 21339436
Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1165-72
pubmed: 21841149
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):299-305
pubmed: 24956454
Resuscitation. 2014 Jul;85(7):952-6
pubmed: 24746782
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Aug;213(2):212-217.e10
pubmed: 21658974
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 17;369(1641):20130205
pubmed: 24639578
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Feb;37(1):17-23
pubmed: 28939466
Br J Surg. 2019 Jul;106(8):1005-1011
pubmed: 30993676
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6
pubmed: 21208779
CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):45-53
pubmed: 33683616
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 25;6:143
pubmed: 22654747
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):776-86
pubmed: 26199428
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):350-353
pubmed: 28228469
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):e194704
pubmed: 31774483
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;25(2):193-206
pubmed: 21550544
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):46
pubmed: 28320312
Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74
pubmed: 10694957
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;114(6):958-62
pubmed: 25783742
Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):816-824
pubmed: 28917549
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):393-400
pubmed: 31389323
Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):669-77
pubmed: 24917333
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e160-e163
pubmed: 31153630
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):303-9
pubmed: 16076797
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1576-98
pubmed: 16898980
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):W1-W12
pubmed: 29812983
Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):655-664
pubmed: 33399225
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:471-99
pubmed: 11148314
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):145-53
pubmed: 23000323
Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):807-15
pubmed: 23404986
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Oct;217:154-160
pubmed: 28898688