Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy rechallenge following checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced lung cancer patients: a retrospective multi-center cohort study.
Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP)
immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
lung cancer
rechallenge
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
19
07
2022
accepted:
08
11
2022
entrez:
15
12
2022
pubmed:
16
12
2022
medline:
16
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is one of the most fatal immune-related adverse events (irAE). However, only limited data are available on rechallenge with ICIs after CIP. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rechallenge after CIP in patients with advanced lung cancer to identify the potential populations that would benefit. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of advanced lung cancer patients who received further ICI treatment (rechallenge) or did not undergo re-administration after grade ≥1 CIP between May 2017 and May 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from first or second ICI initiation to disease progression (PFS1 and PFS2, respectively), death, or last follow-up (OS1 and OS2, respectively). The recurrence of CIP and new irAEs in these patients after ICI rechallenge were calculated. Among 107 patients afflicted with CIP, 45 (42.1%) received ICI rechallenge. Multivariate analysis showed that severe grade (grades ≥3) and ground-glass opacity of pneumonitis lesions were negatively associated with rechallenge. Following rechallenge, 9 (20.0%) patients developed recurrent pneumonitis, and 11 (24.4%) developed a new irAE. Severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at initial CIP as well as levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), and absolute white blood cell and neutrophil counts at the time of ICI rechallenge were associated with a higher recurrence rate. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS1 and PFS2 were 17.9 (9.9-24.2) and 15.5 (5.5-25.6) months, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) OS1 and OS2 were 23.5 (16.5-30.5) and 18.4 (10.1-26.7) months, respectively. Lower OS2 was observed in patients with severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at the initial CIP, recurrence of CIP, and in patients with high levels of CRP and IL-6 at rechallenge. Only IL-6 was found to affect OS2 on multivariate analysis. ICI rechallenge following CIP may be a promising treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly in those with low-grade of CIP and good performance status at initial CIP, and low levels of IL-6 and CRP at the time of initial challenge. Prospective studies are needed for further verification.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is one of the most fatal immune-related adverse events (irAE). However, only limited data are available on rechallenge with ICIs after CIP. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rechallenge after CIP in patients with advanced lung cancer to identify the potential populations that would benefit.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of advanced lung cancer patients who received further ICI treatment (rechallenge) or did not undergo re-administration after grade ≥1 CIP between May 2017 and May 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from first or second ICI initiation to disease progression (PFS1 and PFS2, respectively), death, or last follow-up (OS1 and OS2, respectively). The recurrence of CIP and new irAEs in these patients after ICI rechallenge were calculated.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Among 107 patients afflicted with CIP, 45 (42.1%) received ICI rechallenge. Multivariate analysis showed that severe grade (grades ≥3) and ground-glass opacity of pneumonitis lesions were negatively associated with rechallenge. Following rechallenge, 9 (20.0%) patients developed recurrent pneumonitis, and 11 (24.4%) developed a new irAE. Severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at initial CIP as well as levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), and absolute white blood cell and neutrophil counts at the time of ICI rechallenge were associated with a higher recurrence rate. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS1 and PFS2 were 17.9 (9.9-24.2) and 15.5 (5.5-25.6) months, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) OS1 and OS2 were 23.5 (16.5-30.5) and 18.4 (10.1-26.7) months, respectively. Lower OS2 was observed in patients with severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at the initial CIP, recurrence of CIP, and in patients with high levels of CRP and IL-6 at rechallenge. Only IL-6 was found to affect OS2 on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
ICI rechallenge following CIP may be a promising treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly in those with low-grade of CIP and good performance status at initial CIP, and low levels of IL-6 and CRP at the time of initial challenge. Prospective studies are needed for further verification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36519018
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-732
pii: tlcr-11-11-2289
pmc: PMC9742619
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2289-2305Informations de copyright
2022 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-22-732/coif). YS serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research from September 2020 to August 2022. MJ received lecturer fees, aboard fees and travel grants from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, MSD, Boehringeringelheim. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Dec 11;9:1430
pubmed: 30618738
Sci Immunol. 2018 Dec 7;3(30):
pubmed: 30530726
Lung Cancer. 2018 Nov;125:150-156
pubmed: 30429014
Adv Clin Chem. 2009;48:111-36
pubmed: 19803417
Oncologist. 2020 Nov;25(11):981-992
pubmed: 32860288
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:139-148
pubmed: 26765102
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):865-871
pubmed: 32297899
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):415-429
pubmed: 33569323
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1721-1728
pubmed: 30242316
Brain Behav Immun. 2018 May;70:61-75
pubmed: 29499302
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Dec;13(12):1930-1939
pubmed: 30267842
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;5(1):95
pubmed: 29162153
J Clin Invest. 2019 Jul 16;129(10):4305-4315
pubmed: 31310589
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35(7):709-717
pubmed: 27646942
Lung Cancer. 2018 Nov;125:212-217
pubmed: 30429022
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142
pubmed: 28881921
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;21(5):e497-e510
pubmed: 32605892
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 27;13(5):
pubmed: 33673446
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):640-647
pubmed: 30777894
Chest. 2018 Dec;154(6):1416-1423
pubmed: 30189190
Oncology. 2020;98(2):123-130
pubmed: 31665718
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3070-3077
pubmed: 32150668
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;25(3):551-557
pubmed: 29207939
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Oct;10(10):2006-2012
pubmed: 31482678
Melanoma Res. 2021 Aug 1;31(4):371-377
pubmed: 34054056
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 May 09;12:1758835920922033
pubmed: 32426052
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1714-1768
pubmed: 29442540
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov;148(11):3081-3089
pubmed: 34982222
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Jan;69(1):15-22
pubmed: 31745589
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Dec;8(2):
pubmed: 33428586
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 13;11:698832
pubmed: 34327140
Oncoimmunology. 2020 Jun 16;9(1):1774314
pubmed: 32923134
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 01;5(9):1310-1317
pubmed: 31169866
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Sep;10(9):1243-1260
pubmed: 26291008
Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 Sep;6(9):1093-1099
pubmed: 29991499