Impact role stress on turnover intentions of Pakistan's healthcare workers: Mediating and moderating role of organizational cynicism and self-efficacy.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
05
2020
accepted:
30
11
2022
entrez:
15
12
2022
pubmed:
16
12
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nurses make up most of the global healthcare system, thus justifying their significance in the respective industry. The healthcare profession is amongst the very few careers that are attributed to a very high level of stress and imbalanced work-life equilibrium. Over past decades, the said nature of work has been observed to coerce countless nurses to leave their respective organizations. Considering this, the current study primarily evaluates the impact of role stressors on the turnover intentions of nurses employed in the healthcare industry of Pakistan. Secondly, the study examines the mediatory role of organizational cynicism between the role stressors and turnover intentions to explain the escalating trend of nurses intending to leave the industry. Lastly, it assesses the moderating role of self-efficacy between the organizational cynicism and the intended turnover of a nurse, to gauge the amount of variation self-efficacy can cause to mitigate the negative attitudes of employed individuals. The current study was conducted in the twin metropolitans of Pakistan i.e., Rawalpindi and Islamabad. A total of 394 responses were statistically evaluated using SmartPLS 3.0. The results of the current study indicated a significant impact of role stressors on the turnover intentions of nurses. Also, organizational cynicism was observed as a significant mediator between role stressors and turnover intentions. Further, self-efficacy as well was observed as a significant moderator between organizational cynicism and the intent of healthcare workers to leave the organization. The present study addressed the conceptual research gap by exploring the direct cumulative effect of role stress (role ambiguity, role conflict, role stressors, work-family conflict) in developing the intents of professionals to quit their employing organizations, the mediatory role of organizational cynicism, and the moderation effect of self-efficacy between the undertaken variables. While in terms of abridging the contextual research gap, the current study evaluated the proposed research model within the healthcare sector of Pakistan. The findings of the current study commended the management personnel of the healthcare industry to provide the nurses with healthy professional environments to work in, as well as catering to their professional and personal expectations to a better extent. Hence, increasing the ownership of an individual depicted towards his/her employing organization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36520815
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279075
pii: PONE-D-20-13099
pmc: PMC9754294
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0279075Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Nazir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Appl Nurs Res. 2016 May;30:268-75
pubmed: 25769936
Annu Rev Psychol. 1980;31:457-501
pubmed: 20809783
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):327-337
pubmed: 30187541
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jun;29(6):1360-9
pubmed: 10354230
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Feb;54(4):481-92
pubmed: 11848269
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2006 Mar-Apr;22(2):70-7
pubmed: 16603904
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:21-31
pubmed: 30928718
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Dec;18(24):3450-60
pubmed: 20487491
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Oct;71(10):2350-63
pubmed: 26043649
Aging Ment Health. 2016;20(4):352-61
pubmed: 25674968
Nurs Health Sci. 2005 Mar;7(1):57-65
pubmed: 15670007
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Feb;14(1):72-8
pubmed: 17244008
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
pubmed: 18697684
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Feb 3;15(1):11
pubmed: 28159017
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1080-9
pubmed: 25801311
J Appl Psychol. 1996 Apr;81(2):123-33
pubmed: 8603909
Front Psychol. 2021 May 21;12:606215
pubmed: 34093302
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(3-4):499-508
pubmed: 30091259
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Mar - Apr;65(2):202-211
pubmed: 27939200
J Occup Health Psychol. 2005 Jan;10(1):44-53
pubmed: 15656720
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Oct;87(5):875-84
pubmed: 12395812
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;39:130-140
pubmed: 29422148
Prog Transplant. 2004 Mar;14(1):61-7
pubmed: 15077740
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1235-42
pubmed: 23360486
J Appl Psychol. 1975 Dec;60(6):713-9
pubmed: 1194173
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep - Oct;66:1-8
pubmed: 32590254
Am J Health Behav. 2019 Jul 1;43(4):705-716
pubmed: 31239014
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Sep;56(3):313-8
pubmed: 19702804
J Nurs Educ. 1990 Mar;29(3):102-8
pubmed: 2156971
Br Med Bull. 2019 Jun 19;130(1):25-37
pubmed: 31086957
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;39:200-206
pubmed: 29422159
Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105
pubmed: 13634291
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:48-57
pubmed: 27591723
Am Sociol Rev. 2014 Jun 1;79(3):485-516
pubmed: 25349460
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015 Oct;12(4):287-96
pubmed: 25469956
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Jul;40(5):555-65; discussion 567-9
pubmed: 12828980
Psychol Monogr. 1965;79(14):14:1-20
pubmed: 5850311
Hum Relat. 2017 Nov;70(11):1342-1365
pubmed: 29081536
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Sep;51(5):580-589
pubmed: 31328372
J Nurs Manag. 2011 Sep;19(6):721-31
pubmed: 21899625
Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):93-115
pubmed: 21500915