TROP2, androgen receptor, and PD-L1 status in histological subtypes of high-grade metaplastic breast carcinomas.


Journal

Histopathology
ISSN: 1365-2559
Titre abrégé: Histopathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7704136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
revised: 08 12 2022
received: 27 09 2022
accepted: 13 12 2022
pubmed: 18 12 2022
medline: 4 3 2023
entrez: 17 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

High-grade metaplastic breast carcinoma (HG-MBC) is a rare subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, mostly triple-negative. Metaplastic carcinomas are less responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are associated with a worse outcome than invasive carcinomas of no special type. Clinicopathological characteristics and immunophenotype were retrospectively assessed in a series of 65 patients diagnosed with HG-MBC between 2005 and 2017 at the Curie Institute (antibody panel: oestrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], androgen receptor [AR], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2], programmed death ligand-1 [PD-L1], and trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 [TROP2]). The median age at diagnosis was 59.5 years. Six (9%) patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Among the nonmetastatic patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, 26% (5/19) achieved pathological complete response. Most tumours were pT1/pT2 (77%) and 12% were pN+. Histological subtypes (mixed, squamous, mesenchymal, and spindle cell) were 40%, 35.5%, 15.5%, and 9%, respectively. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes were low or moderate except when squamous differentiation was present. Most tumours were triple-negative (92%). AR and TROP2 were positive in 34% and 85% of the cases, respectively. PD-L1 was positive in tumour cells in 18% (cutoff: 1% of positive tumour cells) of the cases and in tumour-infiltrating immune cells in 40% (cutoff: 1% of tumour area) of the cases. Notably, spindle cell and mesenchymal metaplastic breast carcinomas were mostly PDL1-negative. Lastly, 21 (32.3%) cases were HER2-low, all being HER2 1+, with no HER2 2+. Metaplastic breast carcinoma could benefit from tailored therapeutic strategies adapted to the phenotypic specificities of histological subtypes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36527253
doi: 10.1111/his.14852
doi:

Substances chimiques

CD274 protein, human 0
B7-H1 Antigen 0
Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Receptors, Androgen 0
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

664-671

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K, Franko J, Klimberg VS, Bland K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006; 14; 166-173.
Dwyer JB, Clark BZ. Low-grade fibromatosis-like spindle cell carcinoma of the breast. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2015; 139; 6.
Bataillon G, Fuhrmann L, Girard E et al. High rate of PIK3CA mutations but no TP53 mutations in low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology 2018; 73; 273-283.
Liao HY, Zhang WW, Sun JY, Li FY, He ZY, Wu SG. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of different histological subtypes in triple-negative breast cancer. J. Cancer 2018; 9; 296-303.
Xiao M, Yang Z, Tang X, Mu L, Cao X, Wang X. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Oncol. Lett. 2017; 14; 1971-1978.
Zhang Y, Lv F, Yang Y et al. Clinicopathological Features and prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma: experience of a major Chinese cancer center. PLoS One 2015; 10; e0131409.
Ong CT, Campbell BM, Thomas SM et al. Metaplastic breast cancer treatment and outcomes in 2500 patients: a retrospective analysis of a National Oncology Database. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018; 25; 2249-2260.
Takala S, Heikkilä P, Nevanlinna H, Blomqvist C, Mattson J. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: prognosis and response to systemic treatment in metastatic disease. Breast J. 2019; 25; 418-424.
El Zein D, Hughes M, Kumar S et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast is more aggressive than triple-negative breast cancer: a study from a single institution and review of literature. Clin. Breast Cancer 2017; 17; 382-391.
Leyrer CM, Berriochoa CA, Agrawal S et al. Predictive factors on outcomes in metaplastic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2017; 165; 499-504.
Cimino-Mathews A, Verma S, Figueroa-Magalhaes MC et al. A clinicopathologic analysis of 45 patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016; 145; 365-372.
Mills MN, Yang GQ, Oliver DE et al. Histologic heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer: a National Cancer Centre Database analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2018; 98; 48-58.
Schroeder MC, Rastogi P, Geyer CE, Miller LD, Thomas A. Early and locally advanced metaplastic breast cancer: presentation and survival by receptor status in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) 2010-2014. Oncologist 2018; 223; 481-488.
Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008; 26; 1275-1281.
Harbeck N, Gluz O. Neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer. Breast 2017; 34; S99-S103.
Tzanninis IG, Kotteas EA, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Kontogianni P, Fotopoulos G. Management and outcomes in metaplastic breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 2016; 16; 437-443.
Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018; 379; 2108-2121.
Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020; 382; 810-821.
Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet 2020; 396; 1817-1828.
Dill EA, Gru AA, Atkins KA et al. PD-L1 expression and intratumoral heterogeneity across breast cancer subtypes and stages: an assessment of 245 primary and 40 metastatic tumors. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 41; 334-342.
Joneja U, Vranic S, Swensen J et al. Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1. J. Clin. Pathol. 2017; 70; 255-259.
Zhai J, Giannini G, Ewalt MD et al. Molecular characterization of metaplastic breast carcinoma via next-generation sequencing. Hum. Pathol. 2019; 86; 85-92.
Afkhami M, Schmolze D, Yost SE et al. Mutation and immune profiling of metaplastic breast cancer: correlation with survival. PLoS One 2019; 14; e0224726.
Doğukan R, Uçak R, Doğukan FM, Tanık C, Çitgez B, Kabukcuoğlu F. Correlation between the expression of PD-L1 and clinicopathological parameters in triple negative breast cancer patients. Eur. J. Breast Health 2019; 15; 235-241.
Morgan E, Suresh A, Ganju A et al. Assessment of outcomes and novel immune biomarkers in metaplastic breast cancer: a single institution retrospective study. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2020; 18; 11.
Vranic S, Stafford P, Palazzo J et al. Molecular profiling of the metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma of the breast reveals potentially targetable biomarkers. Clin. Breast Cancer 2020; 20; 326-331.e1.
Chao X, Liu L, Sun P et al. Immune parameters associated with survival in metaplastic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2020; 22; 92.
Kalaw E, Lim M, Kutasovic JR et al. Metaplastic breast cancers frequently express immune checkpoint markers FOXP3 and PD-L1. Br. J. Cancer 2020; 123; 1665-1672.
Gucalp A, Tolaney S, Isakoff SJ et al. Phase II trial of bicalutamide in patients with androgen receptor-positive, estrogen receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013; 19; 5505-5512.
Traina TA, Miller K, Yardley DA et al. Enzalutamide for the treatment of androgen receptor-expressing triple-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018; 36; 884-890.
Bonnefoi H, Grellety T, Tredan O et al. A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with triple-negative androgen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (UCBG 12-1). Ann. Oncol. 2016; 27; 812-818.
Park S, Koo J, Park HS et al. Expression of androgen receptors in primary breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2010; 21; 488-492.
Kim HM, Kim DH, Jung WH, Koo JS. Molecular classification of metaplastic carcinoma using surrogate immunohistochemical staining. Pathobiology 2014; 81; 69-77.
Teoh PY, Tan GC, Mahsin H, Wong YP. Androgen receptor expression in triple negative breast carcinoma and its association with the clinicopathological parameters. Malays. J. Pathol. 2019; 41; 125-132.
Voutilainen S, Heikkilä P, Sampo M, Nevanlinna H, Blomqvist C, Mattson J. Expression of markers of stem cell characteristics, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, basal-like phenotype, proliferation, and androgen receptor in metaplastic breast cancer and their prognostic impact. Acta Oncol. Stockh. Swed. 2021; 60; 1233-1239.
Bardia A, Mayer IA, Vahdat LT et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019; 380; 741-751.
Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021; 384; 1529-1541.
Gerratana L, Basile D, Buono G et al. Androgen receptor in triple negative breast cancer: a potential target for the targetless subtype. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018; 68; 102-110.
Wang C, Pan B, Zhu H et al. Prognostic value of androgen receptor in triple negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2016; 7; 46482-46491.
Ambrogi F, Fornili M, Boracchi P et al. Trop-2 is a determinant of breast cancer survival. PLoS One 2014; 9; e96993.
Zhao W, Kuai X, Zhou X et al. Trop2 is a potential biomarker for the promotion of EMT in human breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018; 40(2); 759-766.
Lai HW, Tseng LM, Chang TW et al. The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB) - a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Breast 2013; 22; 968-973.

Auteurs

Suzanne Chartier (S)

Department of Pathology, Hôpital Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Camille Brochard (C)

Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Charlotte Martinat (C)

Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Florence Coussy (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Jean-Guillaume Feron (JG)

Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Youlia Kirova (Y)

Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Paul Cottu (P)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Caterina Marchiò (C)

Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.

Anne Vincent-Salomon (A)

Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH