Co-creation and priority setting for applied and implementation research in One Health: Improving capacities in public and animal health systems in Kenya.
Anthropology
Co-creation
Community
Decision making
Development agenda
Ecosystem health
Empowerment
Gender-based approach
Global health security
Human right
Inclusive training
Indigenous peoples
Integration
Kenya
One health
Participatory research
Prioritization
Public participation
Sustainable environment
Journal
One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 2352-7714
Titre abrégé: One Health
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101660501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
11
08
2022
revised:
15
11
2022
accepted:
15
11
2022
entrez:
19
12
2022
pubmed:
20
12
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Kenyan government has successfully been implementing sector specific and multisectoral projects aligned to the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA). For operational readiness and to enhance the effective planning and implementation of Global Health Security Programs (GHSP) at national and subnational level, there is an urgent need for stakeholders' engagement process to seek input in identifying challenges, prioritise activities for field implementation, and identify applied research and development questions, that should be addressed in the next five years. The modified Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method was used to identify global health security related priorities for multisectoral implementation in Kenya. Subject matter experts from human, animal and environmental health sectors at national and subnational level contributed to predefined research questions from a number of sources and activities for consideration for implementation using a One Health approach. Sixty-two experts scored the 193 questions based on five pre-defined criteria: 1) feasibility and answerability; 2) potential for burden reduction; 3) potential for a paradigm shift; 4) potential for translation and implementation; and 5) impact on equity. Data resulting from this process was then analysed in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to determine the research priorities and experts' agreements. Among the priority activities identified for implementation research were; strengthening One Health governance and legal frameworks; integration of ecosystem health into One Health programming; strengthening disease reporting, integrated data collection, information sharing and joint outbreak response; socio-anthropological and gender-based approaches in improving risk and behavioural change communication and community engagement; and one health workforce development. In addition, the potentials to invest in collaborative predictive risk modelling to enhance epidemic intelligence systems, while strengthening the One Health approach in the food safety incident and emergency response plans are feasible. Successful multisectoral implementation of global health security program in Kenya calls for a whole of society approach that will harness community and private sector knowledge to build preparedness and response capacities while targeting neglected and marginalised populations. This research provides a framework that is worth emulating for cost-effective planning and implementation of overarching One Health programs.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The Kenyan government has successfully been implementing sector specific and multisectoral projects aligned to the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA). For operational readiness and to enhance the effective planning and implementation of Global Health Security Programs (GHSP) at national and subnational level, there is an urgent need for stakeholders' engagement process to seek input in identifying challenges, prioritise activities for field implementation, and identify applied research and development questions, that should be addressed in the next five years.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The modified Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method was used to identify global health security related priorities for multisectoral implementation in Kenya. Subject matter experts from human, animal and environmental health sectors at national and subnational level contributed to predefined research questions from a number of sources and activities for consideration for implementation using a One Health approach. Sixty-two experts scored the 193 questions based on five pre-defined criteria: 1) feasibility and answerability; 2) potential for burden reduction; 3) potential for a paradigm shift; 4) potential for translation and implementation; and 5) impact on equity. Data resulting from this process was then analysed in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to determine the research priorities and experts' agreements.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Among the priority activities identified for implementation research were; strengthening One Health governance and legal frameworks; integration of ecosystem health into One Health programming; strengthening disease reporting, integrated data collection, information sharing and joint outbreak response; socio-anthropological and gender-based approaches in improving risk and behavioural change communication and community engagement; and one health workforce development. In addition, the potentials to invest in collaborative predictive risk modelling to enhance epidemic intelligence systems, while strengthening the One Health approach in the food safety incident and emergency response plans are feasible.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Successful multisectoral implementation of global health security program in Kenya calls for a whole of society approach that will harness community and private sector knowledge to build preparedness and response capacities while targeting neglected and marginalised populations. This research provides a framework that is worth emulating for cost-effective planning and implementation of overarching One Health programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36532669
doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100460
pii: S2352-7714(22)00092-1
pmc: PMC9754982
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100460Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Fasina FO for all authors.
Références
Croat Med J. 2008 Dec;49(6):720-33
pubmed: 19090596
Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):392-429
pubmed: 27265562
One Health. 2021 Sep 15;13:100325
pubmed: 34584927
J Glob Health. 2022 Apr 15;12:09003
pubmed: 35475006
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Feb 21;2(1):e000121
pubmed: 28588996
PLoS Pathog. 2022 Jun 23;18(6):e1010537
pubmed: 35737670
Nat Microbiol. 2022 Apr;7(4):467-468
pubmed: 35210574
Glob Policy. 2017 Nov;8(4):483-494
pubmed: 32336994
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):
pubmed: 35332054
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 May 31;4(2):
pubmed: 31159338
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Mar 4;37(3):385-399
pubmed: 34791224
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1754016
pubmed: 32406330
Rev Sci Tech. 2019 May;38(1):145-154
pubmed: 31564744
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 10;19(Suppl 3):465
pubmed: 32326940