Flattening the COVID-19 curve: Emotions mediate the effects of a persuasive message on preventive action.
COVID-19
cross-cultural research
emotions
intervention
social persuasion
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
22
09
2022
accepted:
07
11
2022
entrez:
19
12
2022
pubmed:
20
12
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Across four countries (Canada, USA, UK, and Italy), we explored the effects of persuasive messages on intended and actual preventive actions related to COVID-19, and the role of emotions as a potential mechanism for explaining these effects. One thousand seventy-eight participants first reported their level of concern and emotions about COVID-19 and then received a positive persuasive text, negative persuasive text, or no text. After reading, participants reported their emotions about the pandemic and their willingness to take preventive action. One week following, the same participants reported the frequency with which they engaged in preventive action and behaviors that increased the risk of contracting COVID-19. Results revealed that the positive persuasive text significantly increased individuals' willingness to and actual engagement in preventive action and reduced risky behaviors 1 week following the intervention compared to the control condition. Moreover, significant differences were found between the positive persuasive text condition and negative persuasive text condition whereby individuals who read the positive text were more willing and actually engaged in more preventive action compared to those who read the negative text. No differences were found, however, at the 1-week follow-up for social distancing and isolation behaviors. Results also revealed that specific discrete emotions mediated relations between the effects of the texts and preventive action (both willing and actual). This research highlights the power of educational interventions to prompt behavioral change and has implications for pandemic-related interventions, government policy on health promotion messages, and future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36533067
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047241
pmc: PMC9751357
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1047241Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Muis, Sinatra, Pekrun, Kendeou, Mason, Jacobs, Van Tilburg, Orcutt, Zaccoletti and Losenno.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Health Commun. 2007;21(1):35-44
pubmed: 17461750
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373
pubmed: 32993455
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:719-745
pubmed: 30110576
Health Educ Res. 2011 Dec;26(6):976-87
pubmed: 21885672
Cogn Emot. 2003 May;17(3):477-500
pubmed: 29715745
AIDS Care. 2007 Mar;19(3):432-40
pubmed: 17453580
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550
pubmed: 33119535
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Pediatrics. 2014 Sep;134(3):e675-83
pubmed: 25136038
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1966-1980
pubmed: 33926324
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):205-23
pubmed: 16700634
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110420
pubmed: 33082614
J Interprof Care. 2019 Jan-Feb;33(1):57-65
pubmed: 30160542
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):33-46
pubmed: 30117115
J Pers. 2001 Aug;69(4):583-615
pubmed: 11497031
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20222
pubmed: 34642341
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159780
pubmed: 27459237
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1326-1339
pubmed: 32312183
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):803-821
pubmed: 27193159
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Feb 20;33(5):2361-2374
pubmed: 35661202
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:987114
pubmed: 36312173
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jan;45(1):168-181
pubmed: 27585919