Factors associated with the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatation of symptomatic strictures in Crohn's disease: a retrospective cohort study.
Crohn’s disease
adult
colonoscopy
dilatation
endoscopic balloon dilatation
endoscopy
inflammatory bowel disease
stricture
therapy
Journal
Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 1502-7708
Titre abrégé: Scand J Gastroenterol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0060105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
medline:
23
5
2023
pubmed:
20
12
2022
entrez:
19
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is a standard treatment for intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease (CD). No evidence-based guidelines exist regarding the balloon diameter or the balloon pressure to be used, with recent studies suggesting the use of a smaller diameter than classically used. We sought to analyze the factors associated with safety and efficacy of EBD in CD strictures, particularly looking at balloon diameter and dilatation pressure. We conducted a monocentric retrospective study of patients who underwent EBD between 2005 and 2020. Our endoscopy department performed EBD in 94 CD patients during the considered period. The mean size of balloon dilatation was 16 mm (±2.5; including 21 patients with balloon <14 mm) and the mean dilatation pressure was 5.3 atm (±1.5). No perforation was observed. Over a median follow-up of 5.6 years, the probability of being operated was 5.4% at 1 year and 10.4% at 3 years. Smaller height (HR = 0.90, In this retrospective cohort, including a significant proportion of CD patients dilated with balloon <14 mm, no perforation was observed and the size of the balloon or the dilatation pressure had no impact on the risk of surgery or redilatation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36533307
doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2156808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM