Breaking the cycles of violence with narrative exposure: Development and feasibility of NETfacts, a community-based intervention for populations living under continuous threat.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 03 09 2020
accepted: 10 08 2022
entrez: 19 12 2022
pubmed: 20 12 2022
medline: 22 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Interpersonal violence damages mental health and frequently leads to aggressive defence strategies. If survivors are subsequently blamed for the events, both consequences worsen. Stigma flourishes, especially when survivors are silenced so that details of the trauma remain unknown. Breaking the secrecy both at the individual and collective level is key to enable the healing and reconciliation of individuals and communities living under continuous threat. The NETfacts health system is a stepped care model with three components: (1) Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), an evidence-based trauma therapy that includes survivor testimony (2) NET for Forensic Offender Rehabilitation (FORNET) acknowledges that perpetrators are frequently also victims and assists in reducing aggression and the attraction to violence, and (3) a community intervention disseminating and discussing Facts derived from NET treatment (NETfacts) to challenge the collective avoidance of atrocities and other traumatic material. The intervention was piloted in a community with 497 adult residents in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. The willingness of clients to consent to sharing their anonymised testimonies (with a focus on sexual violence survivors and ex-combatants) was investigated, together with other components of feasibility including security and clinical safety, extent of support of respected local authorities and participation rates. As secondary outcomes, clinical and social measures were assessed before and post NETfacts among 200 village residents of whom 160 self-enrolled and 40 had not participated in any form of treatment. Implementation was feasible with 248 clients from a partner project giving consent to use their testimonies and high support of respected local authorities and participation rates (56% of residents self-enrolled in NETfacts). Immediate beneficial effects were shown for posttraumatic stress and rejection of rape myths among NETfacts participants who experienced multiple traumatic events in their own past. Attitudes towards ex-combatants improved and the perceived lack of social acknowledgement after trauma increased independent from participation. No significant change was observed for depressive symptoms. NETfacts is a feasible and promising approach to challenge the culture of secrecy surrounding trauma, suppression and social exclusion. Long term effectiveness requires further evaluation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Interpersonal violence damages mental health and frequently leads to aggressive defence strategies. If survivors are subsequently blamed for the events, both consequences worsen. Stigma flourishes, especially when survivors are silenced so that details of the trauma remain unknown. Breaking the secrecy both at the individual and collective level is key to enable the healing and reconciliation of individuals and communities living under continuous threat.
METHOD
The NETfacts health system is a stepped care model with three components: (1) Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), an evidence-based trauma therapy that includes survivor testimony (2) NET for Forensic Offender Rehabilitation (FORNET) acknowledges that perpetrators are frequently also victims and assists in reducing aggression and the attraction to violence, and (3) a community intervention disseminating and discussing Facts derived from NET treatment (NETfacts) to challenge the collective avoidance of atrocities and other traumatic material. The intervention was piloted in a community with 497 adult residents in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. The willingness of clients to consent to sharing their anonymised testimonies (with a focus on sexual violence survivors and ex-combatants) was investigated, together with other components of feasibility including security and clinical safety, extent of support of respected local authorities and participation rates. As secondary outcomes, clinical and social measures were assessed before and post NETfacts among 200 village residents of whom 160 self-enrolled and 40 had not participated in any form of treatment.
RESULTS
Implementation was feasible with 248 clients from a partner project giving consent to use their testimonies and high support of respected local authorities and participation rates (56% of residents self-enrolled in NETfacts). Immediate beneficial effects were shown for posttraumatic stress and rejection of rape myths among NETfacts participants who experienced multiple traumatic events in their own past. Attitudes towards ex-combatants improved and the perceived lack of social acknowledgement after trauma increased independent from participation. No significant change was observed for depressive symptoms.
CONCLUSION
NETfacts is a feasible and promising approach to challenge the culture of secrecy surrounding trauma, suppression and social exclusion. Long term effectiveness requires further evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36534649
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275421
pii: PONE-D-20-25719
pmc: PMC9762574
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0275421

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Schmitt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 1;106(35):15079-84
pubmed: 19706472
Brain Behav. 2021 Jun;11(6):e02156
pubmed: 33942549
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec 09;8:425
pubmed: 25538590
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Mar;66:64-71
pubmed: 25701801
Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(6):354-63
pubmed: 25323203
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Oct;19(10):1157-71
pubmed: 15358940
Clin Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan;1(1):30-40
pubmed: 23638342
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Aug 14;6:28186
pubmed: 26290178
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Public Health. 2017 Jan;142:121-135
pubmed: 27622295
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;61(1):77-87
pubmed: 31701532
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):55-68
pubmed: 31792402
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(2):111-32
pubmed: 16768650
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Mar 25;10(1):1550344
pubmed: 31007868
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Dec;33(24):3732-3748
pubmed: 27021740
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Jan;3(1):73-9
pubmed: 5902079
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):807-825
pubmed: 26676201
Neurobiol Stress. 2020 Apr 01;12:100217
pubmed: 32435666
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Feb;109:52-58
pubmed: 30502492
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1159-1165
pubmed: 26691507
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;89(3):143-155
pubmed: 33829803
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Feb 25;6:24981
pubmed: 25720994
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Mar;17(3):549
pubmed: 25736701
Emotion. 2015 Oct;15(5):603-14
pubmed: 25799160
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Aug;24(3):233-259
pubmed: 32321373
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:88-92
pubmed: 29459336
BMC Psychiatry. 2004 Oct 25;4:34
pubmed: 15504233
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Feb;28(1):100-111
pubmed: 28747237
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Feb;33(3):491-514
pubmed: 26460106
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14817-22
pubmed: 20679216
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Oct;105:220-230
pubmed: 31415863
Med Confl Surviv. 2009 Jan-Mar;25(1):4-19
pubmed: 19413154
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):345-53
pubmed: 26825106
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Nov;260 Suppl 2:S100-5
pubmed: 20938671
Can J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;54(8):547-56
pubmed: 19726007
Mol Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;18(11):1211-7
pubmed: 23958960
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Jul;84(1 Pt 1):011130
pubmed: 21867136
Psychol Trauma. 2016 Jul;8(4):468-76
pubmed: 27031081
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Dec;123:103482
pubmed: 31639529
Memory. 2012;20(3):277-99
pubmed: 22348400
Memory. 2004 Jul;12(4):403-15
pubmed: 15487537
Nature. 2002 Oct 31;419(6910):883
pubmed: 12410289
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6270-5
pubmed: 21444827
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:135-138
pubmed: 29279212
Violence Against Women. 2020 Aug;26(10):1059-1079
pubmed: 31226009
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;52(4):359-69
pubmed: 23582867
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 10;8(sup3):1375828
pubmed: 29209466
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:171-179
pubmed: 30658290
J Trauma Stress. 1995 Oct;8(4):675-90
pubmed: 8564278
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Jul;28(10):2156-78
pubmed: 23300194
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):240-248
pubmed: 31200992
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Dec 13;13:100719
pubmed: 33365381
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):9702-9707
pubmed: 30201711
J Trauma Stress. 2016 Dec;29(6):507-514
pubmed: 27859619
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):210-32
pubmed: 20063969
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;54(1):17-36
pubmed: 23061830
Caries Res. 2016;50(6):517-526
pubmed: 27639918
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 22;6:80
pubmed: 26157395
Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;131(2):202-23
pubmed: 15740417
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:203-27
pubmed: 21219190
J Trauma Stress. 2004 Aug;17(4):345-51
pubmed: 15462543
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Jun;104:104471
pubmed: 32371213
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 May 03;13(6):421-34
pubmed: 22551663
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Dec;6(4):393-401
pubmed: 23241471
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 10;9:423
pubmed: 30364089
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;58(4):381-5
pubmed: 21596730
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 Jan;48(1):1-13
pubmed: 31148534
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;52(2):91-100
pubmed: 16615242
Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):52-73
pubmed: 12555794
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;174(3):277-285
pubmed: 27838935
Memory. 2010 Feb;18(2):170-84
pubmed: 19693723
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):984-1002
pubmed: 15482070

Auteurs

Sabine Schmitt (S)

Department of Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Non-Governmental Organization Vivo International e.V., Konstanz, Germany.

Katy Robjant (K)

Department of Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Non-Governmental Organization Vivo International e.V., Konstanz, Germany.

Thomas Elbert (T)

Department of Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Non-Governmental Organization Vivo International e.V., Konstanz, Germany.

Samuel Carleial (S)

Department of Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Anke Hoeffler (A)

Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Amani Chibashimba (A)

Non-Governmental Organization Vivo International e.V., Konstanz, Germany.

Harald Hinkel (H)

Kigali, Rwanda.

Anke Koebach (A)

Department of Clinical and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Non-Governmental Organization Vivo International e.V., Konstanz, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH