Retrograde Optic Nerve Degeneration in Pituitary Adenoma: A Study with RE-PERG.
RE-PERG
optical coherence tomography
pattern electroretinogram
pituitary adenoma
steady-state PERG
visual evoked potentials
visual field
visual pathway
Journal
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
accepted:
29
11
2022
entrez:
20
12
2022
pubmed:
21
12
2022
medline:
21
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
RE-PERG is altered in presence of primary neuronal degeneration of retinal ganglion cells, both in glaucoma and other diseases. A previous study showed that in a model of retrograde degeneration (vascular dementia) RE-PERG was normal. In this study, we enrolled patients with pituitary adenoma (PA) to evaluate RE-PERG findings in another model of retrograde degeneration compared with healthy controls (HC). Based on the outcome of the present and our previous studies with RE-PERG, and reviewing the literature, we discuss the physiopathology of glaucoma. Twelve PA patients and 14 age-matched HC were recruited. All participants performed visual field (VF) test, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cells complex (GCC) thickness measurement by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and RE-PERG, a non-invasive, fast steady-state pattern electroretinogram (SS-PERG) sampled in five consecutive blocks of 130 events. VEPs amplitude was significantly lower in PA with respect to HC (6.8±0.6 vs 7.4±0.6 µV; p=0.045). VEPs latency was higher in PA (123.2±5.8 vs 103.6±4.1 msec; p<0.01). As for VF, mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) were higher in PA (-6.6±2.6 vs -0.01±1.02 dB; p<0.01 and 8.5±3.1 vs 1.5±0.3; p<0.01, respectively). RNFL thickness was lower in PA (88±8.1 vs 97±9.3 µ; p=0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between PA and HC for RE-PERG. There was a significant correlation among MD, PSD, VEPs amplitude, PERG amplitude and RNFL thickness in the PA group, whereas no correlation was found with SDPh, which remains as normal as in the HC group. Our findings confirm that RE-PERG is not altered in retrograde degeneration. Based on the outcome of the present and our previous studies about RE-PERG and glaucoma, we assume that in glaucoma a double mechanism of retinal ganglion cells degeneration, both retrograde and primary, can coexist.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36536926
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384525
pii: 384525
pmc: PMC9759009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4135-4144Informations de copyright
© 2022 Mavilio et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Alberto Mavilio reports a patent IT-201800003274-A1 issued to Ufficio Italiano Brevetti e Marchi. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Doc Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;118(2):155-62
pubmed: 18670795
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 23;11:209-218
pubmed: 28176965
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:571314
pubmed: 26167489
Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(5):505-13
pubmed: 19124035
Doc Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;129(2):71-84
pubmed: 24962442
Doc Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;137(1):37-45
pubmed: 29968203
Can J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;43(1):53-60
pubmed: 18219347
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0236568
pubmed: 32790788
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):979-86
pubmed: 22349567
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;236(4):259-63
pubmed: 9561357
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019 Sep;72:100767
pubmed: 31242454
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13444-9
pubmed: 17684098
Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Jul;69(3):271-81
pubmed: 3168727
Microrna. 2015;4(1):3-17
pubmed: 26149270
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005 Jan;24(1):39-73
pubmed: 15555526
Front Neurol. 2017 Dec 04;8:619
pubmed: 29255441
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Aug;50(8):3535-41
pubmed: 19264884
Doc Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;117(3):223-32
pubmed: 18401605
Brain Commun. 2019;1(1):fcz035
pubmed: 31894207
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 May-Jun;84(3):209-18
pubmed: 1375880
Science. 1981 Feb 27;211(4485):953-5
pubmed: 7466369
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;28(2):113-119
pubmed: 27898470
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;84(9):1024-6
pubmed: 10966958
Doc Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;133(1):1-9
pubmed: 27443562
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3197-207
pubmed: 16123419
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Feb 01;54(2):1236-43
pubmed: 23307964
Doc Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;121(3):197-204
pubmed: 20821036
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4564-72
pubmed: 17898279
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 24;13:1315-1322
pubmed: 31440021