Review of individualized current flow modeling studies for transcranial electrical stimulation.

age current flow simulation forward modeling precision medicine transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Journal

Journal of neuroscience research
ISSN: 1097-4547
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7600111

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
revised: 30 11 2022
received: 10 05 2022
accepted: 03 12 2022
pubmed: 21 12 2022
medline: 18 2 2023
entrez: 20 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is substantial intersubject variability of behavioral and neurophysiological responses to transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), which represents one of the most important limitations of tES. Many tES protocols utilize a fixed experimental parameter set disregarding individual anatomical and physiological properties. This one-size-fits-all approach might be one reason for the observed interindividual response variability. Simulation of current flow applying head models based on available anatomical data can help to individualize stimulation parameters and contribute to the understanding of the causes of this response variability. Current flow modeling can be used to retrospectively investigate the characteristics of tES effectivity. Previous studies examined, for example, the impact of skull defects and lesions on the modulation of current flow and demonstrated effective stimulation intensities in different age groups. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis of electrical conductivities in current flow modeling indicated the most influential tissue compartments. Current flow modeling, when used in prospective study planning, can potentially guide stimulation configurations resulting in individually effective tES. Specifically, current flow modeling using individual or matched head models can be employed by clinicians and scientists to, for example, plan dosage in tES protocols for individuals or groups of participants. We review studies that show a relationship between the presence of behavioral/neurophysiological responses and features derived from individualized current flow models. We highlight the potential benefits of individualized current flow modeling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36537991
doi: 10.1002/jnr.25154
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

405-423

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Neuroscience Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Albizu, A., Fang, R., Indahlastari, A., O'Shea, A., Stolte, S. E., See, K. B., Boutzoukas, E. M., Kraft, J. N., Nissim, N. R., & Woods, A. J. (2020). Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response. Brain Stimulation, 13(6), 1753-1764.
Antonenko, D., Grittner, U., Puonti, O., Flöel, A., & Thielscher, A. (2021). Estimation of individually induced e-field strength during transcranial electric stimulation using the head circumference. Brain Stimulation, 14(5), 1055-1058.
Antonenko, D., Thams, F., Grittner, U., Uhrich, J., Glöckner, F., Li, S. C., & Flöel, A. (2022). Randomized trial of cognitive training and brain stimulation in non-demented older adults. Alzheimer's & Dementia (New York, N. Y.), 8(1), e12262. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12262
Antonenko, D., Thielscher, A., Saturnino, G. B., Aydin, S., Ittermann, B., Grittner, U., & Flöel, A. (2019). Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? Brain Stimulation, 12(5), 1159-1168.
Bergmann, T. O., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021). Inferring causality from noninvasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(2), 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01591
Bestmann, S., & Walsh, V. (2017). Transcranial electrical stimulation. Current Biology, 27(23), R1258-R1262.
Bikson, M., Brunoni, A. R., Charvet, L. E., Clark, V. P., Cohen, L. G., Deng, Z. D., Dmochowski, J., Edwards, D. J., Frohlich, F., Kappenman, E. S., Lim, K. O., Loo, C., Mantovani, A., McMullen, D. P., Parra, L. C., Pearson, M., Richardson, J. D., Rumsey, J. M., Sehatpour, P., … Lisanby, S. H. (2018). Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop. Brain Stimulation, 11(3), 465-480.
Bikson, M., Bulow, P., Stiller, J. W., Datta, A., Battaglia, F., Karnup, S. V., & Postolache, T. T. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: A general system for quantifying transcranial electrotherapy dosage. Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 10(5), 377-385.
Bikson, M., Rahman, A., Datta, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. (2012). High-resolution modeling assisted design of customized and individualized transcranial direct current stimulation protocols. Neuromodulation, 15(4), 306-314.
Brauer, H., Kadish, N. E., Pedersen, A., Siniatchkin, M., & Moliadze, V. (2018). No modulatory effects when stimulating the right inferior frontal gyrus with continuous 6Hz TACs and TRNs on response inhibition: A behavioral study. Neural Plasticity, 2018, 1-11.
Cabral-Calderin, Y., Williams, K. A., Opitz, A., Dechent, P., & Wilke, M. (2016). Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates spontaneous low frequency fluctuations as measured with fMRI. NeuroImage, 141, 88-107.
Cappon, D., Jahanshahi, M., & Bisiacchi, P. (2016). Value and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in the cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review since 2000. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 157.
Caulfield, K. A., Badran, B. W., DeVries, W. H., Summers, P. M., Kofmehl, E., Li, X., Borckardt, J. J., Bikson, M., & George, M. S. (2020). Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Brain Stimulation, 13(4), 961-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.04.007
Caulfield, K. A., Indahlastari, A., Nissim, N. R., Lopez, J. W., Fleischmann, H. H., Woods, A. J., & George, M. S. (2022). Electric field strength from prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation determines degree of working memory response: A potential application of reverse-calculation modeling? Neuromodulation, 25(4), 578-587.
Chung, H., Im, C., Seo, H., & Jun, S. C. (2022). Key factors in the cortical response to transcranial electrical stimulations-A multi-scale modeling study. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 144, 105328.
Ciechanski, P., Carlson, H. L., Yu, S. S., & Kirton, A. (2018). Modeling transcranial direct-current stimulation-induced electric fields in children and adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00268
Coldea, A., Morand, S., Veniero, D., Harvey, M., & Thut, G. (2021). Parietal alpha tACS shows inconsistent effects on visuospatial attention. PLoS One, 16, e0255424.
Crossman, M., Bartl, G., Soerum, R., & Sandrini, M. (2019). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex on episodic memory reconsolidation. Cortex, 121, 78-88.
Dannhauer, M., Brooks, D., Tucker, D., & MacLeod, R. (2012). A pipeline for the simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation for realistic human head models using SCIRun/BioMesh3D. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2012 (pp. 5486-5489). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347236
Datta, A., Baker, J. M., Bikson, M., & Fridriksson, J. (2011). Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimulation, 4(3), 169-174.
Datta, A., Bansal, V., Diaz, J., Patel, J., Reato, D., & Bikson, M. (2009). Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimulation, 2(4), 201-207.
Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Fregni, F. (2010). Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: High-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow. NeuroImage, 52(4), 1268-1278.
Datta, A., Truong, D., Minhas, P., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M. (2012). Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 3, 91. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00091
Dmochowski, J. P., Datta, A., Bikson, M., Su, Y., & Parra, L. C. (2011). Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(4), 046011.
Dmochowski, J. P., Datta, A., Huang, Y., Richardson, J. D., Bikson, M., Fridriksson, J., & Parra, L. C. (2013). Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke. NeuroImage, 75, 12-19.
Dmochowski, J. P., Koessler, L., Norcia, A. M., Bikson, M., & Parra, L. C. (2017). Optimal use of EEG recordings to target active brain areas with transcranial electrical stimulation. NeuroImage, 157, 69-80.
Elyamany, O., Leicht, G., Herrmann, C. S., & Mulert, C. (2021). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): From basic mechanisms towards first applications in psychiatry. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 271(1), 135-156.
Evans, C., Bachmann, C., Lee, J. S. A., Gregoriou, E., Ward, N., & Bestmann, S. (2020). Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site. Brain Stimulation, 13(1), 125-136.
Fertonani, A., & Miniussi, C. (2017). Transcranial electrical stimulation: What we know and do not know about mechanisms. The Neuroscientist, 23(2), 109-123.
Fregni, F., El-Hagrassy, M. M., Pacheco-Barrios, K., Carvalho, S., Leite, J., Simis, M., Brunelin, J., Nakamura-Palacios, E. M., Marangolo, P., Venkatasubramanian, G., San-Juan, D., Caumo, W., Bikson, M., & Brunoni, A. R. (2021). Evidence-based guidelines and secondary meta-analysis for the use of transcranial direct current stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(4), 256-313.
Friehs, M. A., Frings, C., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021). Effects of single-session transcranial direct current stimulation on reactive response inhibition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 128, 749-765.
Gbadeyan, O., Steinhauser, M., Hunold, A., Martin, A. K., Haueisen, J., & Meinzer, M. (2019). Modulation of adaptive cognitive control by prefrontal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in older adults. Journals of Gerontology-Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(7), 1174-1183.
Gomez-Tames, J., Asai, A., & Hirata, A. (2020). Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields. Clinical Neurophysiology, 131(3), 755-765.
Gomez-Tames, J., Asai, A., Mikkonen, M., Laakso, I., Tanaka, S., Uehara, S., Otaka, Y., & Hirata, A. (2019). Group-level and functional-region analysis of electric-field shape during cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation with different electrode montages. Journal of Neural Engineering, 16(3), 036001.
Grossman, N., Bono, D., Dedic, N., Kodandaramaiah, S. B., Rudenko, A., Suk, H. J., Cassara, A. M., Neufeld, E., Kuster, N., Tsai, L. H., Pascual-Leone, A., & Boyden, E. S. (2017). Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell, 169(6), 1029-1041.e16.
Guerra, A., López-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., & Suppa, A. (2020). Variability in non-invasive brain stimulation studies: Reasons and results. Neuroscience Letters, 719, 133330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.058
Guler, S., Dannhauer, M., Erem, B., MacLeod, R., Tucker, D., Turovets, S., Luu, P., Erdogmus, D., & Brooks, D. H. (2016). Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(3), 1-14.
Hartwigsen, G., Bergmann, T. O., Herz, D. M., Angstmann, S., Karabanov, A., Raffin, E., Thielscher, A., & Siebner, H. R. (2015). Modeling the effects of noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation at the biophysical, network, and cognitive level. Progress in Brain Research, 222, 261-287.
Héroux, M. E., Loo, C. K., Taylor, J. L., & Gandevia, S. C. (2017). Questionable science and reproducibility in electrical brain stimulation research. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175635.
Horvath, J. C., Carter, O., & Forte, J. D. (2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation: Five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be). Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 2.
Hsu, T. Y., Juan, C. H., & Tseng, P. (2016). Individual differences and state-dependent responses in transcranial direct current stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 643.
Huang, Y., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Parra, L. C. (2019). Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation-ROAST-A fully automated open-source pipeline. Journal of Neural Engineering, 16(5), 056006.
Huang, Y., Liu, A. A., Lafon, B., Friedman, D., Dayan, M., Wang, X., Bikson, M., Doyle, W. K., Devinsky, O., & Parra, L. C. (2017). Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation. eLife, 6, e18834.
Huang, Y., Parra, L. C., & Haufe, S. (2016). The New York head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting. NeuroImage, 140, 150-162.
Hunold, A., Haueisen, J., Freitag, C. M., Siniatchkin, M., & Moliadze, V. (2021). Cortical current density magnitudes during transcranial direct current stimulation correlate with skull thickness in children, adolescent and young adults. Progress in Brain Research, 264, 41-56.
Indahlastari, A., Albizu, A., Kraft, J. N., O'Shea, A., Nissim, N. R., Dunn, A. L., Carballo, D., Gordon, M. P., Taank, S., Kahn, A. T., Hernandez, C., Zucker, W. M., & Woods, A. J. (2021). Individualized tDCS modeling predicts functional connectivity changes within the working memory network in older adults. Brain Stimulation, 14(5), 1205-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.08.003
Indahlastari, A., Albizu, A., O'Shea, A., Forbes, M. A., Nissim, N. R., Kraft, J. N., Evangelista, N. D., Hausman, H. K., & Woods, A. J. (2020). Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain. Brain Stimulation, 13(3), 664-674.
Indahlastari, A., Kasinadhuni, A. K., Saar, C., Castellano, K., Mousa, B., Chauhan, M., Mareci, T. H., & Sadleir, R. J. (2018). Methods to compare predicted and observed phosphene experience in tACS subjects. Neural Plasticity, 2018, 8525706.
Jamil, A., Batsikadze, G., Kuo, H. I., Meesen, R. L. J., Dechent, P., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A. (2020). Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 41(6), 1644-1666.
Johnson, E. L., Arciniega, H., Jones, K. T., Kilgore-Gomez, A., & Berryhill, M. E. (2022). Individual predictors and electrophysiological signatures of working memory enhancement in aging. NeuroImage, 250, 118939.
Jones, K. T., Arciniega, H., & Berryhill, M. E. (2019). Replacing tDCS with theta tACS provides selective, but not general WM benefits. Brain Research, 1720, 146324.
Jones, K. T., Johnson, E. L., & Berryhill, M. E. (2020). Frontoparietal theta-gamma interactions track working memory enhancement with training and tDCS. NeuroImage, 211, 116615.
Jung, Y.-J., Kim, J.-H., Kim, D., & Im, C.-H. (2013). An image-guided transcranial direct current stimulation system: A pilot phantom study. Physiological Measurement, 34(8), 937-950.
Kalloch, B., Bazin, P. L., Villringer, A., Sehm, B., & Hlawitschka, M. (2020). A flexible workflow for simulating transcranial electric stimulation in healthy and lesioned brains. PLoS One, 15(5), e0228119.
Karabanov, A., Thielscher, A., & Siebner, H. R. (2016). Transcranial brain stimulation: Closing the loop between brain and stimulation. Current Opinion in Neurology, 29(4), 397-404.
Kasten, F. H., Duecker, K., Maack, M. C., Meiser, A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2019). Integrating electric field modeling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects. Nature Communications, 10(1), 5427.
Kessler, S. K., Minhas, P., Woods, A. J., Rosen, A., Gorman, C., & Bikson, M. (2013). Dosage considerations for transcranial direct current stimulation in children: A computational modeling study. PLoS One, 8(9), e76112.
Khan, A., Antonakakis, M., Vogenauer, N., Haueisen, J., & Wolters, C. H. (2022). Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology, 134, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.016
Kim, D., Jeong, J., Jeong, S., Kim, S., Jun, S. C., & Chung, E. (2015). Validation of computational studies for electrical brain stimulation with phantom head experiments. Brain Stimulation, 8(8), 914-925.
Kim, J. H., Kim, D. W., Chang, W. H., Kim, Y. H., Kim, K., & Im, C. H. (2014). Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: Electric field simulation using individual MRI data. Neuroscience Letters, 564, 6-10.
Klaus, J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2021). Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22183.
Krause, B., & Kadosh, R. C. (2014). Not all brains are created equal: The relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 25.
Kunze, T., Hunold, A., Haueisen, J., Jirsa, V., & Spiegler, A. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation changes resting state functional connectivity: A large-scale brain network modeling study. NeuroImage, 140(October), 174-187.
Laakso, I., & Hirata, A. (2013). Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes. Journal of Neural Engineering, 10(4), 046009.
Laakso, I., Mikkonen, M., Koyama, S., Hirata, A., & Tanaka, S. (2019). Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex? Scientific Reports, 9(1), 626.
Laakso, I., Tanaka, S., Mikkonen, M., Koyama, S., Sadato, N., & Hirata, A. (2016). Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study. NeuroImage, 137, 140-151.
Lee, C., Jung, Y. J., Lee, S. J., & Im, C. H. (2017). COMETS2: An advanced MATLAB toolbox for the numerical analysis of electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 277, 56-62.
Lee, J. S. A., Bestmann, S., & Evans, C. (2021). A future of current flow modelling for transcranial electrical stimulation? Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 8, 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-021-00238-5
Lee, S., Lee, C., Park, J., & Im, C.-H. (2020). Individually customized transcranial temporal interference stimulation for focused modulation of deep brain structures: A simulation study with different head models. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 11730.
Lefaucheur, J. P., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Cogiamanian, F., Cotelli, M., De Ridder, D., Ferrucci, R., Langguth, B., Marangolo, P., Mylius, V., Nitsche, M. A., Padberg, F., Palm, U., Poulet, E., Priori, A., Rossi, S., Schecklmann, M., … Paulus, W. (2017). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(1), 56-92.
Li, L. M., Uehara, K., & Hanakawa, T. (2015). The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 9, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00181
Liu, A., Vöröslakos, M., Kronberg, G., Henin, S., Krause, M. R., Huang, Y., Opitz, A., Mehta, A., Pack, C. C., Krekelberg, B., Berényi, A., Parra, L. C., Melloni, L., Devinsky, O., & Buzsáki, G. (2018). Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation. Nature Communications, 9(1), 5092.
Manenti, R., Sandrini, M., Gobbi, E., Cobelli, C., Brambilla, M., Binetti, G., & Cotelli, M. (2017). Strengthening of existing episodic memories through non-invasive stimulation of prefrontal cortex in older adults with subjective memory complaints. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 401.
Medina, J., & Cason, S. (2017). No evidential value in samples of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies of cognition and working memory in healthy populations. Cortex, 94, 131-141.
Meier, J., Nolte, G., Schneider, T. R., Engel, A. K., Leicht, G., & Mulert, C. (2019). Intrinsic 40Hz-phase asymmetries predict tACS effects during conscious auditory perception. PLoS One, 14(4), e0213996.
Mendonca, M. E., Santana, M. B., Baptista, A. F., Datta, A., Bikson, M., Fregni, F., & Araujo, C. P. (2011). Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: Optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models. Journal of Pain, 12(5), 610-617.
Mikkonen, M., Laakso, I., Tanaka, S., & Hirata, A. (2020). Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields. Brain Stimulation, 13(1), 117-124.
Miniussi, C., Harris, J. A., & Ruzzoli, M. (2013). Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(8), 1702-1712.
Miranda, P. C., Callejón-Leblic, M. A., Salvador, R., & Ruffini, G. (2018). Realistic modeling of transcranial current stimulation: The electric field in the brain. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 8, 20-27.
Miranda, P. C., Lomarev, M., & Hallett, M. (2006). Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(7), 1623-1629.
Mosayebi-Samani, M., Jamil, A., Salvador, R., Ruffini, G., Haueisen, J., & Nitsche, M. A. (2021). The impact of individual electrical fields and anatomical factors on the neurophysiological outcomes of tDCS: A TMS-MEP and MRI study. Brain Stimulation, 14(2), 316-326.
Muffel, T., Kirsch, F., Shih, P. C., Kalloch, B., Schaumberg, S., Villringer, A., & Sehm, B. (2019). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over S1 differentially modulates proprioceptive accuracy in young and old adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 11, 264.
Naskovska, K., Lau, S., Korobkov, A. A., Haueisen, J., & Haardt, M. (2020). Coupled CP decomposition of simultaneous MEG-EEG signals for differentiating oscillators during photic driving. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00261
Opitz, A., Falchier, A., Yan, C. G., Yeagle, E. M., Linn, G. S., Megevand, P., Thielscher, A., Deborah, R. A., Milham, M. P., Mehta, A. D., & Schroeder, C. E. (2016). Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates. Scientific Reports, 6, 31236.
Opitz, A., Paulus, W., Will, S., Antunes, A., & Thielscher, A. (2015). Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage, 109, 140-150.
Paulus, W. (2011). Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES-tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21(5), 602-617.
Peterchev, A. V., Wagner, T. A., Miranda, P. C., Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W., Lisanby, S. H., Pascual-Leone, A., & Bikson, M. (2012). Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimulation, 5(4), 435-453.
Piastra, M. C., van der Cruijsen, J., Piai, V., Jeukens, F. E. M., Manoochehri, M., Schouten, A. C., Selles, R. W., & Oostendorp, T. (2021). ASH: An automatic pipeline to generate realistic and individualized chronic stroke volume conduction head models. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(4), 044001.
Rahman, A., Reato, D., Arlotti, M., Gasca, F., Datta, A., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M. (2013). Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: Somatic and synaptic terminal effects. The Journal of Physiology, 591(10), 2563-2578.
Rampersad, S. M., Janssen, A. M., Lucka, F., Aydin, U., Lanfer, B., Lew, S., Wolters, C. H., Stegeman, D. F., & Oostendorp, T. F. (2014). Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 22(3), 441-452.
Rasmussen, I. D., Boayue, N. M., Mittner, M., Bystad, M., Grønli, O. K., Vangberg, T. R., Csifcsák, G., Aslaksen, P. M., & Peter, J. (2021). High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves delayed memory in Alzheimer's disease patients: A pilot study using computational modeling to optimize electrode position. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 83(2), 753-769.
Reed, T., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2018). Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) mechanisms and its effects on cortical excitability and connectivity. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 41(6), 1123-1130.
Reinhart, R. M. G., & Nguyen, J. A. (2019). Working memory revived in older adults by synchronizing rhythmic brain circuits. Nature Neuroscience, 22(5), 820-827.
Ruffini, G., Fox, M. D., Ripolles, O., Miranda, P. C., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2014). Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields. NeuroImage, 89, 216-225.
Sabel, B. A., Kresinsky, A., Cardenas-Morales, L., Haueisen, J., Hunold, A., Dannhauer, M., & Antal, A. (2021). Evaluating current density modeling of non-invasive eye and brain electrical stimulation using Phosphene thresholds. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29, 2133-2141.
Sadleir, R. J., Vannorsdall, T. D., Schretlen, D. J., & Gordon, B. (2010). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model. NeuroImage, 51(4), 1310-1318.
Salvador, R., Biagi, M. C., Puonti, O., Splittgerber, M., Moliadze, V., Siniatchkin, M., Thielscher, A., & Ruffini, G. (2020). Personalization of multi-electrode setups in tCS/tES: Methods and advantages. In S. N. Makarov, G. M. Noetscher, & A. Nummenmaa (Eds.), Brain and human body modeling 2020: Computational human models presented at EMBC 2019 and the BRAIN Initiative® 2019 meeting (pp. 119-135). Springer.
Saturnino, G. B., Madsen, K. H., & Thielscher, A. (2019). Electric field simulations for transcranial brain stimulation using FEM: An efficient implementation and error analysis. Journal of Neural Engineering, 16(6), 066032.
Saturnino, G. B., Thielscher, A., Madsen, K. H., Knösche, T. R., & Weise, K. (2019). A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations. NeuroImage, 188, 821-834.
Schmidt, C., Wagner, S., Burger, M., van Rienen, U., & Wolters, C. H. (2015). Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target. Journal of Neural Engineering, 12(4), 046028.
Schwab, K., Ligges, C., Jungmann, T., Hilgenfeld, B., Haueisen, J., & Witte, H. (2006). Alpha entrainment in human electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram recordings. Neuroreport, 17(17), 1829-1833.
Soleimani, G., Saviz, M., Bikson, M., Towhidkhah, F., Kuplicki, R., Paulus, M. P., & Ekhtiari, H. (2021). Group and individual level variations between symmetric and asymmetric DLPFC montages for tDCS over large scale brain network nodes. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1271.
Splittgerber, M., Borzikowsky, C., Salvador, R., Puonti, O., Papadimitriou, K., Merschformann, C., Biagi, M. C., Stenner, T., Brauer, H., & Breitling-Ziegler, C. (2021). Multichannel anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a paediatric population. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-15.
Splittgerber, M., Salvador, R., Brauer, H., Breitling-Ziegler, C., Prehn-Kristensen, A., Krauel, K., Nowak, R., Ruffini, G., Moliadze, V., & Siniatchkin, M. (2020). Individual baseline performance and electrode montage impact on the effects of anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00349
Suen, P. J. C., Doll, S., Batistuzzo, M. C., Busatto, G., Razza, L. B., Padberg, F., Mezger, E., Bulubas, L., Keeser, D., De Deng, Z., & Brunoni, A. R. (2021). Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: Data from the ELECT-TDCS trial. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 271(1), 101-110.
Sun, W., Dong, X., Yu, G., Shuai, L., Yuan, Y., & Ma, C. (2021). Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: A finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field. Journal of International Medical Research, 49(2), 030006052094211.
Suzuki, M., Tanaka, S., Gomez-Tames, J., Okabe, T., Cho, K., Iso, N., & Hirata, A. (2022). Nonequivalent after-effects of alternating current stimulation on motor cortex oscillation and inhibition: Simulation and experimental study. Brain Sciences, 12(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195
Tan, J., Wansbrough, K., Williams, A. G., Nitsche, M. A., Vallence, A. M., & Fujiyama, H. (2020). The importance of model-driven approaches to set stimulation intensity for multi-channel transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Brain Stimulation, 13(4), 1002-1004.
Thut, G., Bergmann, T. O., Fröhlich, F., Soekadar, S. R., Brittain, J.-S., Valero-Cabré, A., Sack, A. T., Miniussi, C., Antal, A., Siebner, H. R., Ziemann, U., & Herrmann, C. S. (2017). Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(5), 843-857.
Truong, D. Q., Magerowski, G., Blackburn, G. L., Bikson, M., & Alonso-Alonso, M. (2013). Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines. NeuroImage. Clinical, 2, 759-766.
Tseng, P., Hsu, T. Y., Chang, C. F., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., Muggleton, N. G., Walsh, V., Liang, W. K., Cheng, S. K., & Juan, C. H. (2012). Unleashing potential: Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10554-10561.
Veniero, D., Benwell, C. S. Y., Ahrens, M. M., & Thut, G. (2017). Inconsistent effects of parietal α-tACS on pseudoneglect across two experiments: A failed internal replication. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00952
Vergallito, A., Feroldi, S., Pisoni, A., & Lauro, L. J. R. (2022). Inter-individual variability in tDCS effects: A narrative review on the contribution of stable, variable, and contextual factors. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 522.
Vöröslakos, M., Takeuchi, Y., Brinyiczki, K., Zombori, T., Oliva, A., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Kozák, G., Kincses, Z. T., Iványi, B., Buzsáki, G., & Berényi, A. (2018). Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans. Nature Communications, 9(1), 483.
Vosskuhl, J., Strüber, D., & Herrmann, C. S. (2018). Non-invasive brain stimulation: A paradigm shift in understanding brain oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00211
Wagner, S., Burger, M., & Wolters, C. H. (2016). An optimization approach for well-targeted transcranial direct current stimulation. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 76(6), 2154-2174.
Wagner, S., Rampersad, S. M., Aydin, Ü., Vorwerk, J., Oostendorp, T. F., Neuling, T., Herrmann, C. S., Stegeman, D. F., & Wolters, C. H. (2014). Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model. Journal of Neural Engineering, 11(1), 016002.
Wagner, T., Fregni, F., Fecteau, S., Grodzinsky, A., Zahn, M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2007). Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study. NeuroImage, 35(3), 1113-1124.
Windhoff, M., Opitz, A., & Thielscher, A. (2013). Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models. Human Brain Mapping, 34(4), 923-935.
Wischnewski, M., Mantell, K. E., & Opitz, A. (2021). Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: A novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 130, 147-161.
Zanto, T. P., Jones, K. T., Ostrand, A. E., Hsu, W. Y., Campusano, R., & Gazzaley, A. (2021). Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 14(5), 1317-1329.

Auteurs

Alexander Hunold (A)

Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, TU Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.

Jens Haueisen (J)

Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, TU Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.

Frauke Nees (F)

Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.

Vera Moliadze (V)

Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH