Development and validation of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for predicting breast cancer incidence in Japanese females: a population-based case-cohort study.
Female
Humans
Breast Neoplasms
/ epidemiology
Cohort Studies
East Asian People
/ genetics
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genome-Wide Association Study
Incidence
Longitudinal Studies
Multifactorial Inheritance
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Risk Factors
Japan
/ epidemiology
Health Status Indicators
Risk Assessment
Breast cancer
East-Asian
Genome-wide association study
Japanese
Polygenic risk score
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
28
09
2022
accepted:
08
12
2022
pubmed:
21
12
2022
medline:
1
2
2023
entrez:
20
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to develop an ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for the prediction of breast cancer events in Japanese females and validate it in a longitudinal cohort study. Using publicly available summary statistics of female breast cancer genome-wide association study (GWAS) of Japanese and European ancestries, we, respectively, developed 31 candidate genome-wide PRSs using pruning and thresholding (P + T) and LDpred methods with varying parameters. Among the candidate PRS models, the best model was selected using a case-cohort dataset (63 breast cancer cases and 2213 sub-cohorts of Japanese females during a median follow-up of 11.9 years) according to the maximal predictive ability by Harrell's C-statistics. The best-performing PRS for each derivation GWAS was evaluated in another independent case-cohort dataset (260 breast cancer cases and 7845 sub-cohorts of Japanese females during a median follow-up of 16.9 years). For the best PRS model involving 46,861 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; P + T method with P This study developed a breast cancer PRS for Japanese females and demonstrated the usefulness of the PRS for breast cancer risk stratification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36538246
doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06843-6
pii: 10.1007/s10549-022-06843-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
661-671Subventions
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 23-A-31 [toku]
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 26-A-2
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 29-A-4
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 2020-J-4
Organisme : Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
ID : 19shi-2
Organisme : Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control
ID : JP16ck0106095
Organisme : Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control
ID : JP19ck0106266
Organisme : Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control
ID : JP22ck0106551
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Yanes T, Young MA, Meiser B, James PA (2020) Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field. Breast Cancer Res 22:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01260-3
doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01260-3
Narod SA (2018) Personalised medicine and population health: breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Genet 137:769–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1944-6
doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1944-6
Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J, Lush M, Fachal L, Lee A et al (2019) Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 104:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002
Mars N, Widén E, Kerminen S, Meretoja T, Pirinen M, Della Briotta Parolo P et al (2020) The role of polygenic risk and susceptibility genes in breast cancer over the course of life. Nat Commun 11:6383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19966-5
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19966-5
Mars N, Koskela JT, Ripatti P, Kiiskinen TTJ, Havulinna AS, Lindbohm JV et al (2020) Polygenic and clinical risk scores and their impact on age at onset and prediction of cardiometabolic diseases and common cancers. Nat Med 26:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0800-0
doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0800-0
Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, Haeberle L, Ziv E, Jensen MR et al (2015) The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:dju397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju397
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju397
Cuzick J, Brentnall AR, Segal C, Byers H, Reuter C, Detre S et al (2017) Impact of a panel of 88 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women: results from two randomized tamoxifen prevention trials. J Clin Oncol 35:743–750. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.8944
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.8944
Shieh Y, Eklund M, Madlensky L, Sawyer SD, Thompson CK, Stover Fiscalini A et al (2017) Breast cancer screening in the precision medicine era: risk-based screening in a population-based trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 109:5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw290
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw290
Esserman LJ, WISDOM Study and Athena Investigators (2017) The WISDOM study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate. npj Breast Cancer 3:34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0035-5
doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0035-5
UNICANCER (2021) International randomized study comparing personalized, risk-stratified to standard breast cancer screening in women aged 40–70 [Internet] Clinicaltrials.gov Cited 2021 Nov 4. Report No. nct03672331. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331
Martin AR, Kanai M, Kamatani Y, Okada Y, Neale BM, Daly MJ (2019) Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet 51:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x
Park SL, Cheng I, Haiman CA (2018) Genome-wide association studies of cancer in diverse populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0169
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0169
Lin PI, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA, Martin ER (2007) No gene is an island: the flip-flop phenomenon. Am J Hum Genet 80:531–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/512133
doi: 10.1086/512133
Lee CPL, Irwanto A, Salim A, Yuan J, min, Liu J, Koh WP, et al (2014) Breast cancer risk assessment using genetic variants and risk factors in a Singapore Chinese population. Breast Cancer Res 16:R64. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3678
doi: 10.1186/bcr3678
Wen W, Shu XO, Guo X, Cai Q, Long J, Bolla MK et al (2016) Prediction of breast cancer risk based on common genetic variants in women of East Asian ancestry. Breast Cancer Res 18:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0786-1
doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0786-1
Hsieh YC, Tu SH, Su CT, Cho EC, Wu CH, Hsieh MC et al (2017) A polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4144-5
doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4144-5
Chan CHT, Munusamy P, Loke SY, Koh GL, Yang AZY, Law HY et al (2018) Evaluation of three polygenic risk score models for the prediction of breast cancer risk in Singapore Chinese. Oncotarget 9:12796–12804. https://doi.org/10.1832/oncotarget.24374
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24374
Tsugane S, Sawada N (2014) The JPHC study: design and some findings on the typical Japanese diet. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44:777–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyu096
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu096
Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38:904–909. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1847
doi: 10.1038/ng1847
Yamaguchi-Kabata Y, Nakazono K, Takahashi A, Saito S, Hosono N, Kubo M et al (2008) Japanese population structure, based on SNP genotypes from 7003 individuals compared to other ethnic groups: effects on population-based association studies. Am J Hum Genet 83:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.019
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.019
Hachiya T, Komaki S, Hasegawa Y, Ohmomo H, Tanno K, Hozawa A et al (2017) Genome-wide meta-analysis in Japanese populations identifies novel variants at the TMC6-TMC8 and SIX3-SIX2 loci associated with HbA1c. Sci Rep 7:16147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16493-0
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16493-0
Hachiya T, Narita A, Ohmomo H, Sutoh Y, Komaki S, Tanno K et al (2018) Genome-wide analysis of polymorphism × sodium interaction effect on blood pressure identifies a novel 3′-BCL11B gene desert locus. Sci Rep 8:14162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32074-1
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32074-1
Loh PR, Danecek P, Palamara PF, Fuchsberger C, Reshef YA, Finucane HK et al (2016) Reference-based phasing using the haplotype reference consortium panel. Nat Genet 48:1443–1448. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3679
doi: 10.1038/ng.3679
Loh PR, Palamara PF, Price AL (2016) Fast and accurate long-range phasing in a UK Biobank cohort. Nat Genet 48:811–816. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3571
doi: 10.1038/ng.3571
Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S, Sidore C, Locke AE, Kwong A et al (2016) Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 48:1284–1287. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3656
doi: 10.1038/ng.3656
Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, Haas ME, Roselli C, Choi SH et al (2018) Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat Genet 50:1219–1224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z
Ishigaki K, Akiyama M, Kanai M, Takahashi A, Kawakami E, Sugishita H et al (2020) Large-scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identifies novel susceptibility loci across different diseases. Nat Genet 52:669–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-0640-3
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0640-3
Michailidou K, Lindström S, Dennis J, Beesley J, Hui S, Kar S et al (2017) Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature 551:92–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24284
doi: 10.1038/nature24284
Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Genomes Project Consortium et al (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15393
doi: 10.1038/nature15393
Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ (2015) Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience 4:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
Bulik-Sullivan BK, Loh PR, Finucane HK, Ripke S, Yang J, Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2015) LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 47:291–295
doi: 10.1038/ng.3211
Vilhjálmsson BJ, Yang J, Finucane HK, Gusev A, Lindström S, Ripke S et al (2015) Modeling linkage disequilibrium increases accuracy of polygenic risk scores. Am J Hum Genet 97:576–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.001
Harrell FE, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA (1982) Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA 247:2543–2546. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030
doi: 10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030
Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Rosner D, Izumi S (1999) Analysis of case-cohort designs. J Clin Epidemiol 52:1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00102-x
doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00102-x
Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J, Lush M, Fachal L, Lee A et al (2018) Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 104:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002
Lambert SA, Gil L, Jupp S, Ritchie SC, Xu Y, Buniello A et al (2021) The polygenic score catalog as an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation. Nat Genet 53:420–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00783-5
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00783-5
Buniello A, MacArthur JAL, Cerezo M, Harris LW, Hayhurst J, Malangone C et al (2019) The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D1005–D1012. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1120
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1120
Sham PC, Cherny SS, Purcell S, Hewitt JK (2000) Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data. Am J Hum Genet 66:1616–1630. https://doi.org/10.1086/302891
doi: 10.1086/302891
Momozawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Parsons MT, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, Tamura C et al (2018) Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls. Nat Commun 9:4083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06581-8
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06581-8