Sexual and gender identity and note-leaving among adult suicide decedents in the USA.

Gender and sexual minority (SGM) LGBTQ National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) note-leaving suicide

Journal

BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Dec 2022
Historique:
entrez: 20 12 2022
pubmed: 21 12 2022
medline: 21 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Suicide is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the USA, representing a critical public health threat. Suicide risks differ for different populations. In particular, the sexual and gender minority (SGM) population remains at increased risk for suicide. One of the circumstances that may differ for SGM and non-SGM individuals is the propensity to leave a suicide note. Information regarding note-leaving may be helpful in informing suicide prevention and intervention. This study documents the differences in note-leaving in SGM individuals compared with non-SGM individuals, using recent data from the National Violent Death Reporting System ( We fit a logistic regression model with SGM status and covariates predicting note-leaving in suicide. SGM decedents were 1.508 times more likely to leave a note than their non-SGM counterparts, controlling for demographic, mental health and substance use covariates. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring suicide prevention and intervention efforts to meet the needs of SGM populations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Suicide is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the USA, representing a critical public health threat. Suicide risks differ for different populations. In particular, the sexual and gender minority (SGM) population remains at increased risk for suicide. One of the circumstances that may differ for SGM and non-SGM individuals is the propensity to leave a suicide note. Information regarding note-leaving may be helpful in informing suicide prevention and intervention.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
This study documents the differences in note-leaving in SGM individuals compared with non-SGM individuals, using recent data from the National Violent Death Reporting System (
METHOD METHODS
We fit a logistic regression model with SGM status and covariates predicting note-leaving in suicide.
RESULTS RESULTS
SGM decedents were 1.508 times more likely to leave a note than their non-SGM counterparts, controlling for demographic, mental health and substance use covariates.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings highlight the importance of tailoring suicide prevention and intervention efforts to meet the needs of SGM populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36539265
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.610
pii: S205647242200610X
pmc: PMC9798214
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e6

Références

Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):575-600
pubmed: 20438238
Crisis. 2012 Jan 1;33(2):73-9
pubmed: 22343058
Crisis. 2016 Sep;37(5):361-369
pubmed: 27659515
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):684-693
pubmed: 32320023
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Apr;59(2):226-8
pubmed: 15823174
Psychol Bull. 2020 Dec;146(12):1117-1145
pubmed: 33119344
Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2373-82
pubmed: 22726518
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jun;64(6):811
pubmed: 31122511
Arch Suicide Res. 2016;20(2):176-90
pubmed: 26820702
Inj Epidemiol. 2019 May 20;6:18
pubmed: 31245267
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;46(2):111-7
pubmed: 20033129
Public Health. 2019 Dec;177:128-134
pubmed: 31563700
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):e1-12
pubmed: 27049424
Crisis. 2011;32(6):319-33
pubmed: 21945840
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(6):1-77
pubmed: 32501203
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018 Feb;48(1):12-20
pubmed: 27982463
Crisis. 2012;33(6):344-9
pubmed: 22759663
J Homosex. 2011;58(1):10-51
pubmed: 21213174
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jun;64(6):810
pubmed: 31122510
Arch Suicide Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2):548-564
pubmed: 32897837
Omega (Westport). 2011;63(1):79-94
pubmed: 21748922
Lancet. 2016 Mar 19;387(10024):1227-39
pubmed: 26385066
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):512-521
pubmed: 30898221
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009 Oct;39(5):558-68
pubmed: 19929155
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Aug 18;8:70
pubmed: 18706118
Biomed Inform Insights. 2012;5(Suppl. 1):147-54
pubmed: 22879771
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015 May-Jun;43(3):69-79
pubmed: 25999154
PLoS One. 2018 May 22;13(5):e0197805
pubmed: 29787584
J Fam Psychol. 2003 Sep;17(3):429-38
pubmed: 14562466
Am J Psychiatry. 1959 Jul;116(1):59-63
pubmed: 13661450
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Apr;66(4):470-477
pubmed: 31982330

Auteurs

Holly P O'Rourke (HP)

T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, USA.

Chanler D Hilley (CD)

Department of Psychological Science, Kennesaw State University, USA.

Emily Lowell (E)

T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, USA.

Connor M Sheehan (CM)

T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, USA.

Classifications MeSH