Association between surgical tracheostomy and chronic tracheal stenosis: A retrospective, single-center study.

computed tomography intubation surgical tracheostomy tracheal stenosis triangulation

Journal

Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 22 09 2022
accepted: 17 11 2022
entrez: 22 12 2022
pubmed: 23 12 2022
medline: 23 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tracheal stenosis is a major complication of tracheostomy. Accordingly, anesthesiologists tend to select a smaller endotracheal tube (ETT) than usual for patients with a prior tracheostomy history, regardless of the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms. However, it likely comes from our trial and error, not scientific evidence. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively examined the association between traditional surgical tracheostomy and tracheal stenosis as assessed by transverse computed tomography (CT). Patients who underwent surgery for head and neck cancer from January 2010 to December 2013, with a temporary tracheostomy closed within a couple of months, were included. Exclusion criteria were tracheostoma before surgery, permanent tracheostomy, or insufficient CT follow-up. Transverse CT slices were measured 2 cm above and below the tracheostomy site (0.5 cm/slice for a total of 9 slices). The minimum cross-sectional tracheal area and horizontal and vertical diameters in transverse CT slices were compared before (baseline: BL), 6 months (6M) and 12 months (12M) after tracheostomy. Tracheal stenosis was defined as a decrease in the minimum cross-sectional tracheal area compared to BL. Of 112 patients, 77 were included. The minimum tracheal area was significantly decreased at 6M and 12M compared to BL (BL: mean 285 [SD 68] mm Conventional surgical tracheostomy was associated with a decreased horizontal diameter of the trachea. It resulted in a decreased cross-sectional tracheal area in more than one-half of the patients; however, no patient complained of any respiratory symptoms. Therefore, even without respiratory symptoms, prior tracheostomy causes an increased risk of tracheal stenosis, and using a smaller ETT than usual could be reasonable.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Tracheal stenosis is a major complication of tracheostomy. Accordingly, anesthesiologists tend to select a smaller endotracheal tube (ETT) than usual for patients with a prior tracheostomy history, regardless of the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms. However, it likely comes from our trial and error, not scientific evidence. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively examined the association between traditional surgical tracheostomy and tracheal stenosis as assessed by transverse computed tomography (CT).
Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients who underwent surgery for head and neck cancer from January 2010 to December 2013, with a temporary tracheostomy closed within a couple of months, were included. Exclusion criteria were tracheostoma before surgery, permanent tracheostomy, or insufficient CT follow-up. Transverse CT slices were measured 2 cm above and below the tracheostomy site (0.5 cm/slice for a total of 9 slices). The minimum cross-sectional tracheal area and horizontal and vertical diameters in transverse CT slices were compared before (baseline: BL), 6 months (6M) and 12 months (12M) after tracheostomy. Tracheal stenosis was defined as a decrease in the minimum cross-sectional tracheal area compared to BL.
Results UNASSIGNED
Of 112 patients, 77 were included. The minimum tracheal area was significantly decreased at 6M and 12M compared to BL (BL: mean 285 [SD 68] mm
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Conventional surgical tracheostomy was associated with a decreased horizontal diameter of the trachea. It resulted in a decreased cross-sectional tracheal area in more than one-half of the patients; however, no patient complained of any respiratory symptoms. Therefore, even without respiratory symptoms, prior tracheostomy causes an increased risk of tracheal stenosis, and using a smaller ETT than usual could be reasonable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36544500
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1050784
pmc: PMC9760679
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1050784

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Kuwabara, Yamakawa, Okui, Miyazaki and Uezono.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Sep;100(5_suppl):629S-635S
pubmed: 31914813
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Sep;62(3):811-7
pubmed: 8784012
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Mar;7(2):197-209
pubmed: 29707497
Anesthesiology. 2018 Jun;128(6):1240
pubmed: 29394162
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jun;20(6):905-8
pubmed: 16738980
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R55
pubmed: 16606435
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Feb;99(2):447-53
pubmed: 25497072
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):617-28
pubmed: 26584197
Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr;131(4):E1363-E1368
pubmed: 32846022
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;59(1):82-85
pubmed: 33160732
Arch Surg. 1968 Sep;97(3):380-94
pubmed: 5675951
Laryngoscope. 1988 Nov;98(11):1165-9
pubmed: 3185069
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jul;129(7):1623-1626
pubmed: 30569511
Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2890-6
pubmed: 22824938
Eur Respir J. 2007 Aug;30(2):314-20
pubmed: 16870667
Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):447-54
pubmed: 17334304
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):137-149
pubmed: 29282535
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct;159(4):698-704
pubmed: 30130451
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Nov;9(11):4413-4423
pubmed: 29268510
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):E719-E723
pubmed: 33593035
Chest. 1986 Sep;90(3):430-6
pubmed: 3527584
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Oct;123(4):495-500
pubmed: 11020193
Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):233-41
pubmed: 10903603

Auteurs

Yuki Kuwabara (Y)

Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kentaro Yamakawa (K)

Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Seiko Okui (S)

Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Erica Miyazaki (E)

Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Shoichi Uezono (S)

Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH