Persistence of lower vocal intensity in vocal fold paralysis with cricothyroid impairment after hyaluronate injection.

aerodynamics air pressure cricothyroid injection laryngoplasty unilateral vocal fold paralysis

Journal

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
ISSN: 2378-8038
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101684963

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 30 04 2022
revised: 15 07 2022
accepted: 06 09 2022
entrez: 22 12 2022
pubmed: 23 12 2022
medline: 23 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) affects the glottal gap, voice, and aerodynamics, whereas injection laryngoplasty (IL) using hyaluronate is an effective treatment for UVFP by decreasing the glottal gap to improve voice. Previous studies have shown that the involvement of cricothyroid (CT) muscle in UVFP patients further affects patients' aerodynamics, but it remains unclear whether the difference remains after IL. This study investigates whether the aerodynamic features observed in UVFP with CT involvement could still be observed after IL. This study recruited UVFP patients with dysphonia, and IL was performed within 6 months of initial symptoms. All subjects received assessments including videolaryngoscopy, voice analysis, and aerodynamics at three time points: before IL, 1 month after IL, and 6 months after IL. The glottal gap, voice, and aerodynamics between patients with and without CT involvement (the CT+ and CT- groups) were compared, and the change (Δ) before and after IL and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were also compared between the two groups. A total of 71 patients with UVFP (22 in the CT+ group and 49 in the CT- group) were analyzed. After IL, the CT+ group showed a lower sound pressure level (SPL), higher Δair pressure, and smaller Δaerodynamic power than the CT- group. The CT+ group had a lower SPL, even after elevating air pressure to attempt to achieve a higher vocal intensity. The results suggest that although closure of the glottal gap was achieved by IL, the CT+ group still had a lower loudness and needed to sustain a higher peak air pressure when producing voice. Level 4.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) affects the glottal gap, voice, and aerodynamics, whereas injection laryngoplasty (IL) using hyaluronate is an effective treatment for UVFP by decreasing the glottal gap to improve voice. Previous studies have shown that the involvement of cricothyroid (CT) muscle in UVFP patients further affects patients' aerodynamics, but it remains unclear whether the difference remains after IL. This study investigates whether the aerodynamic features observed in UVFP with CT involvement could still be observed after IL.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This study recruited UVFP patients with dysphonia, and IL was performed within 6 months of initial symptoms. All subjects received assessments including videolaryngoscopy, voice analysis, and aerodynamics at three time points: before IL, 1 month after IL, and 6 months after IL. The glottal gap, voice, and aerodynamics between patients with and without CT involvement (the CT+ and CT- groups) were compared, and the change (Δ) before and after IL and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were also compared between the two groups.
Result UNASSIGNED
A total of 71 patients with UVFP (22 in the CT+ group and 49 in the CT- group) were analyzed. After IL, the CT+ group showed a lower sound pressure level (SPL), higher Δair pressure, and smaller Δaerodynamic power than the CT- group.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The CT+ group had a lower SPL, even after elevating air pressure to attempt to achieve a higher vocal intensity. The results suggest that although closure of the glottal gap was achieved by IL, the CT+ group still had a lower loudness and needed to sustain a higher peak air pressure when producing voice.
Level of evidence UNASSIGNED
Level 4.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36544927
doi: 10.1002/lio2.927
pii: LIO2927
pmc: PMC9764743
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1922-1929

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Références

Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;44(4):594-602
pubmed: 31004468
Laryngoscope. 1995 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):368-72
pubmed: 7715379
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):4010-9
pubmed: 22225055
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996 Apr;105(4):280-5
pubmed: 8604889
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jan;130(1):139-145
pubmed: 30761540
J Voice. 2005 Dec;19(4):519-28
pubmed: 16301098
Chaos. 1995 Mar;5(1):30-34
pubmed: 12780151
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992 Jul;101(7):578-82
pubmed: 1626903
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;22(6):439-43
pubmed: 25136863
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2554-62
pubmed: 20370037
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1967 Dec;76(5):998-1007
pubmed: 6074246
Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1956;8(1):1-24
pubmed: 13330935
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;22(6):444-9
pubmed: 25254404
Cells. 2020 Nov 05;9(11):
pubmed: 33167303
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Jul;69(7):509-13
pubmed: 10442923
J Speech Hear Res. 1964 Mar;7:17-29
pubmed: 14130741
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2216-27
pubmed: 23817931
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126(7):1616-24
pubmed: 26485674
J Voice. 2021 Aug 20;:
pubmed: 34426048
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(2):121-30
pubmed: 25588457
Laryngoscope. 2015 Dec;125(12):2772-7
pubmed: 26198167
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb 20;46(1):14
pubmed: 28219447
Laryngoscope. 2007 Nov;117(11):2068-74
pubmed: 17828043
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2279-95
pubmed: 17902864
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan;124(1):201-6
pubmed: 23712513
Muscle Nerve. 2008 Oct;38(4):1280-9
pubmed: 18816603
Laryngoscope. 2013 Dec;123(12):3110-6
pubmed: 23712542
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 May;118(5):723-7
pubmed: 9591881
Laryngoscope. 2014 Sep;124(9):2125-30
pubmed: 24668456
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;151(6):996-1002
pubmed: 25214548
Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1968;20(4):185-201
pubmed: 5671971
Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):935-940
pubmed: 29355983

Auteurs

Kuo-Cheng Liu (KC)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Medical Foundation) New Taipei City Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.
Graduate School of Science Design Program in Innovation for Smart Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.

Yi-An Lu (YA)

Department of Otolaryngology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.

Hsiu-Feng Chuang (HF)

Department of Otolaryngology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.

Li-Jen Hsin (LJ)

Department of Otolaryngology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.
School of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.

Wan-Ni Lin (WN)

Department of Otolaryngology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.
School of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.

Alice M K Wong (AMK)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.

Yu-Cheng Pei (YC)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.
Graduate School of Science Design Program in Innovation for Smart Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.
School of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.
Center of Vascularized Tissue Allograft Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.

Tuan-Jen Fang (TJ)

Department of Otolaryngology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan Taiwan.
School of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.

Classifications MeSH