Olfactory training assists in olfactory recovery after sinonasal surgery.
olfactory recovery
olfactory training
sinonasal surgery
Journal
Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
ISSN: 2378-8038
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101684963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
17
06
2022
revised:
07
09
2022
accepted:
09
10
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
23
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Olfactory dysfunction is a common complaint in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of olfactory training (OT) in patients with CRS after sinonasal surgery. We enrolled 111 patients with CRS who underwent sinonasal surgery. Prior to surgery and 3 months after starting OT, the participants were assessed by both an olfactory function test and endoscopy. The Korean version of the Sniffin' Stick II (KVSS-II) was used to perform the olfactory function test. Over the course of 3 months, five odorants were used in OT (rose, lemon, cinnamon, orange, and peach). Over a 12-week duration, 37% of the participants in the OT group showed clinically relevant increase in olfactory function. The OT group had significantly higher olfactory outcomes for the total KVSS-II and identification scores than the non-OT group between the initial and follow-up assessments. The initial score influenced the degree of olfactory improvement after OT. Patients with OT exhibited significantly higher total KVSS-II scores compared with non-OT patients following sinonasal surgery; in particular, the odor identification score was different between the two groups. The results of this study demonstrated that a 12-week period of repeated short-term exposure to various odors could be useful in enhancing olfactory activity in patients who underwent sinonasal surgery for the improvement of sensory-neural olfactory impairment. 2c.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36544953
doi: 10.1002/lio2.955
pii: LIO2955
pmc: PMC9764765
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1733-1739Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb;14(1):88-92
pubmed: 32575977
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Jun;36(3):280-6
pubmed: 18775610
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Feb;164(2):244-254
pubmed: 32660334
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;37(6):1143-57, v-vi
pubmed: 15563907
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Sep 01;145(9):846-853
pubmed: 31318413
Am J Rhinol. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):445-8
pubmed: 18702914
Ear Nose Throat J. 2012 May;91(5):198-203, 215
pubmed: 22614554
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):936-948
pubmed: 27576679
Rhinol Suppl. 2017 Mar;54(26):1-30
pubmed: 29528615
Laryngoscope. 2008 Jul;118(7):1260-4
pubmed: 18438263
Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016 Jun;4(2):115-121
pubmed: 27529054
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):496-9
pubmed: 19235739
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1858-63
pubmed: 17003712
Laryngoscope. 1994 Aug;104(8 Pt 1):981-8
pubmed: 8052084
Am J Rhinol. 1997 Jul-Aug;11(4):251-5
pubmed: 9292174
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2512-2514
pubmed: 32432682
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Mar;6(3):299-307
pubmed: 26624966
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;41(6):798-803
pubmed: 27120034
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(2):139-44
pubmed: 19401037
Rhinology. 2017 Mar 1;55(1):17-26
pubmed: 28040824
J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 5;28(45):11511-6
pubmed: 18987187
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013 Oct;40(5):452-7
pubmed: 23312885
Laryngoscope. 2013 Dec;123(12):E85-90
pubmed: 24114690
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1989 Oct;14(5):405-9
pubmed: 2582635
Rhinology. 2005 Mar;43(1):2-10
pubmed: 15844495