Multi-level multi-domain statistical shape model of the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints.
computational morphometrics
foot and ankle
midtarsal joint locking
statistical shape modeling
weightbearing computed tomography
Journal
Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
ISSN: 2296-4185
Titre abrégé: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101632513
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
28
09
2022
accepted:
03
11
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
23
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Traditionally, two-dimensional conventional radiographs have been the primary tool to measure the complex morphology of the foot and ankle. However, the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints are challenging to assess due to their bone morphology and locations within the ankle. Weightbearing computed tomography is a novel high-resolution volumetric imaging mechanism that allows detailed generation of 3D bone reconstructions. This study aimed to develop a multi-domain statistical shape model to assess morphologic and alignment variation of the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints across an asymptomatic population and calculate 3D joint measurements in a consistent weightbearing position. Specific joint measurements included joint space distance, congruence, and coverage. Noteworthy anatomical variation predominantly included the talus and calcaneus, specifically an inverse relationship regarding talar dome heightening and calcaneal shortening. While there was minimal navicular and cuboid shape variation, there were alignment variations within these joints; the most notable is the rotational aspect about the anterior-posterior axis. This study also found that multi-domain modeling may be able to predict joint space distance measurements within a population. Additionally, variation across a population of these four bones may be driven far more by morphology than by alignment variation based on all three joint measurements. These data are beneficial in furthering our understanding of joint-level morphology and alignment variants to guide advancements in ankle joint pathological care and operative treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36545681
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1056536
pii: 1056536
pmc: PMC9760736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1056536Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : K01 AR080221
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR076120
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : U24 EB029011
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Peterson, Lisonbee, Krähenbühl, Saltzman, Barg, Khan, Elhabian and Lenz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 2):368-75
pubmed: 21995050
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jun;141(6):937-945
pubmed: 32785762
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Oct;35(10):1057-62
pubmed: 25015393
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 27;288(1943):20202095
pubmed: 33468002
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jun;42(6):757-767
pubmed: 33504217
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 May;21(5):525-37
pubmed: 12071623
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0134603
pubmed: 26270812
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85
pubmed: 14306381
Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26:1-4
pubmed: 16789441
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jan 31;10:6
pubmed: 28163787
J Anat. 1954 Jan;88(1):25-30
pubmed: 13129168
Med Image Anal. 2003 Sep;7(3):207-20
pubmed: 12946464
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 19;94(24):e181
pubmed: 23318620
J Biomech. 1992 Jun;25(6):591-607
pubmed: 1517255
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2007;20:333-45
pubmed: 17633711
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2009;12(Pt 2):167-74
pubmed: 20426109
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jul 02;8:656
pubmed: 32714904
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 1):477-85
pubmed: 18979781
J Orthop Res. 2019 Sep;37(9):1892-1902
pubmed: 31042001
Clin Orthop. 1960;16:41-6
pubmed: 13819895
J Orthop Res. 2023 Jan;41(1):183-195
pubmed: 35289957
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Aug;467(8):2083-9
pubmed: 19381746
Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Dec;22(4):233-238
pubmed: 27810020
J Orthop Res. 2020 Dec;38(12):2625-2633
pubmed: 32816337
Foot Ankle Clin. 2004 Mar;9(1):127-45
pubmed: 15062218
Med Image Anal. 2022 Feb;76:102271
pubmed: 34974213
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Jan;37(1):109-14
pubmed: 26293157
J Biomech. 2018 May 17;73:185-191
pubmed: 29680311
J Orthop Res. 2014 Jul;32(7):958-66
pubmed: 24719271
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020 Mar 06;5(1):2473011420908796
pubmed: 35097367
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Dec;26(12):1074-80
pubmed: 16390642
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7314
pubmed: 33795729
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1334-40
pubmed: 25237177
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):376-386
pubmed: 29171283
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Aug;28(6):775-784
pubmed: 34656445
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Jul 6;2(7):309-316
pubmed: 28828179
Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Mar;20(3):178-81
pubmed: 10195296
Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Jun;20(2):223-41
pubmed: 26043240
J Orthop Res. 2022 Dec;40(12):2873-2884
pubmed: 35249244
Gait Posture. 2008 Feb;27(2):216-22
pubmed: 17467273
J Anat. 2019 Jan;234(1):132-144
pubmed: 30393864
J Anat. 2022 Feb;240(2):305-322
pubmed: 34549428
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Sep;41(9):1106-1116
pubmed: 32648780