Concentration Dependent Effect of Quaternary Amines on the Adhesion of U251-MG Cells.
U251-MG cells
cationic hydrogels
cell adhesion
live/dead assay
Journal
Gels (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2310-2861
Titre abrégé: Gels
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101696925
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Dec 2022
15 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
20
11
2022
revised:
07
12
2022
accepted:
11
12
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
23
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cationic gels have seen increasing interest in recent years for 2D cell cultivation since they may represent an alternative to the well-known RGD-peptide motif functionalized gels. However, few hydrogel systems with adjustable cationic strength have been fabricated and investigated so far. In this work, eight gels with defined concentrations of cationic groups, two of which also contained the RGD peptide, were prepared from three well-defined, soluble precursor copolymers with thiol-functionalities and PEGDA3500 as a crosslinker via thiol-ene chemistry. Live/dead stainings of U-251-MG cells on the hydrogels with different concentrations of the cationic motif were made after 3 days and 7 days of cultivation. The results show a high dependence of the number of adhesive cells and their morphology, cluster versus spread cells, on the concentration of cationic groups in the gel. This effect was more pronounced when the gels were not further dialyzed before usage. In addition, a synergistic effect of the two motifs, cationic group and RGD peptide, could be demonstrated, which together induce stronger cell adhesion than either motif alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36547352
pii: gels8120827
doi: 10.3390/gels8120827
pmc: PMC9777631
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 397037958
Références
Biomaterials. 2010 Jun;31(18):4809-17
pubmed: 20346502
Nat Methods. 2016 Apr 28;13(5):405-14
pubmed: 27123816
J Proteome Res. 2008 Aug;7(8):3423-7
pubmed: 18578519
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007 Mar 15;55(1):90-7
pubmed: 17207976
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012 Oct;100(10):2637-43
pubmed: 22615234
Med Biol. 1978 Aug;56(4):184-93
pubmed: 359950
Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1124-8
pubmed: 22654050
Biomacromolecules. 2016 Sep 12;17(9):2992-9
pubmed: 27548375
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Dec;13(12):805-11
pubmed: 23151664
Eur Cell Mater. 2013 Sep 20;26:133-49; discussion 149
pubmed: 24052426
Nature. 1984 May 3-9;309(5963):30-3
pubmed: 6325925
Acta Biomater. 2015 Mar;14:43-52
pubmed: 25523876
Int J Pharm. 2015 Jun 20;487(1-2):274-84
pubmed: 25895723
J Histochem Cytochem. 2008 Oct;56(10):901-10
pubmed: 18574248
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:697-715
pubmed: 8970741
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1958 Apr;74(2):443-50
pubmed: 13534673
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20(5-6):577-89
pubmed: 19323877
Acta Biomater. 2015 Jan;11:3-16
pubmed: 25266503
Macromol Biosci. 2017 Mar;17(3):
pubmed: 27748556
J Mater Chem B. 2022 Jul 27;10(29):5520-5536
pubmed: 35819152
J Cell Sci. 2012 Jul 1;125(Pt 13):3015-24
pubmed: 22797912
Macromol Biosci. 2022 May;22(5):e2100453
pubmed: 35152564
Biomaterials. 1992;13(12):863-70
pubmed: 1457680
Biomacromolecules. 2012 May 14;13(5):1663-74
pubmed: 22533450
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1968;74(4):465-86
pubmed: 4313504
Nature. 2004 Apr 1;428(6982):487-92
pubmed: 15057821
Biophys J. 2002 Apr;82(4):1848-57
pubmed: 11916844
Science. 1987 Oct 23;238(4826):491-7
pubmed: 2821619
Biomaterials. 2003 Mar;24(7):1121-31
pubmed: 12527253
Nat Rev Mater. 2020 Jul;5(7):539-551
pubmed: 32953138
J Cell Physiol. 2021 Feb;236(2):741-762
pubmed: 32657458
Biophys J. 2004 Nov;87(5):3547-60
pubmed: 15339814
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Apr;81(1):240-9
pubmed: 17236216