Bacterial Contamination of the Surgical Site at the Time of Elective Caesarean Section in Belgian Blue Cows-Part 1: Identified by Bacterial Culture.
Belgian blue cows
aerobic bacteria
bacterial contamination
clean contaminated surgery
elective caesarean section
preoperative antibiotic
Journal
Veterinary sciences
ISSN: 2306-7381
Titre abrégé: Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101680127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Dec 2022
09 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
20
11
2022
revised:
05
12
2022
accepted:
07
12
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
23
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To improve the efficacy of preoperative antibiotics used in elective caesarean section (CS), we aimed to identify the bacteria contaminating the surgical site during this surgery. A study was conducted on 76 Belgian Blue cows. Bacteriology was performed on cotton swab sampled from the visceral and parietal peritoneum of each cow during the CS. Most of samples showed a negative culture (55/76; 72.37%), 19/76 (25%) were positive (p < 0.0001) and two samples were contaminated. In total, 32 isolates belonging to 18 species were identified. Most of them are aerobic (17/18; 94.44%) and half of them were gram-negative (G-). The most encountered bacteria were Acinetobacter sp. (6/32; 18.75%), Pseudomonas sp. (4/32; 12.5%), Aerococcus viridans (4/32; 12.5%), Psychrobacter sp. (3/32; 9.37%), and Escherichia coli (2/32; 6.25%). Among the identified isolates, 31/32 (96.87%) were aerobic and 1/32 (3.12%) was anaerobic (p = 0.0001). Furthermore, 20/32 (62.50%) strains were G− while 12/32 (37.5%) were gram-positive (G+) (p = 0.012). In fact, most of cultured strains were aerobic G− (20/32), 11/32 were aerobic G+ and 1/32 is anaerobic G+ (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, most of samples showed a negative bacteriology; however, aerobic G− strains were the most identified in positive swabs. Therefore, preoperative antibiotics should be aimed against these bacteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36548847
pii: vetsci9120687
doi: 10.3390/vetsci9120687
pmc: PMC9785745
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Vet Q. 1997 Jun;19(2):88-92
pubmed: 9225440
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Nov 15;172:104785
pubmed: 31614283
BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):661-9
pubmed: 23126271
Vet Rec. 2020 Oct 3;187(7):e49
pubmed: 32591365
Vet Rec. 2016 Jun 25;178(26):654-60
pubmed: 27339926
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 May;97(5):521-535
pubmed: 29215155
Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 29;8(12):
pubmed: 34941822
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1834-40
pubmed: 23554198
Reprod Domest Anim. 2007 Dec;42(6):583-9
pubmed: 17976064
Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 14;9(3):
pubmed: 35324862
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Sep 1;157:50-58
pubmed: 30086849
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Dec;16(6):588-93
pubmed: 16171989
Theriogenology. 2018 Jul 1;114:25-33
pubmed: 29574306
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Dec;93(12):5707-15
pubmed: 21094742
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Dec;68(4):669-85
pubmed: 15590779
Vet J. 2002 May;163(3):267-82
pubmed: 12090769
Microbes Environ. 2014;29(4):335-7
pubmed: 25743613
Front Microbiol. 2021 Apr 30;12:626421
pubmed: 33995290
Theriogenology. 1997 Aug;48(3):513-21
pubmed: 16728146
Reprod Domest Anim. 2010 Dec;45(6):1020-7
pubmed: 19497021
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 30;326(5):281-6
pubmed: 1728731
Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 21;8(5):
pubmed: 33919071
Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 13;7(3):
pubmed: 32933113
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):827-34
pubmed: 24216767