Low-Concentration Atropine Monotherapy vs. Combined with MiSight 1 Day Contact Lenses for Myopia Management.
atropine
contact lenses
myopia
myopia control
myopia progression
Journal
Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2411-5150
Titre abrégé: Vision (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101733282
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Dec 2022
12 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
01
11
2022
revised:
02
12
2022
accepted:
06
12
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
23
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objectives: To assess the decrease in myopia progression and rebound effect using topical low-dose atropine compared to a combined treatment with contact lenses for myopic control. Methods: This retrospective review study included 85 children aged 10.34 ± 2.27 (range 6 to 15.5) who were followed over three years. All had a minimum myopia increase of 1.00 D the year prior to treatment. The children were divided into two treatment groups and a control group. One treatment group included 29 children with an average prescription of 4.81 ± 2.12 D (sphere equivalent (SE) range of 1.25−10.87 D), treated with 0.01% atropine for two years (A0.01%). The second group included 26 children with an average prescription of 4.14 ± 1.35 D (SE range of 1.625−6.00 D), treated with MiSight 1 day dual focus contact lenses (DFCL) and 0.01% atropine (A0.01% + DFCL) for two years. The control group included 30 children wearing single-vision spectacles (SV), averaging −5.06 ± 1.77 D (SE) range 2.37−8.87 D). Results: There was an increase in the SE myopia progression in the SV group of 1.19 ± 0.43 D, 1.25 ± 0.52 D, and 1.13 ± 0.36 D in the first, second, and third years, respectively. Myopia progression in the A0.01% group was 0.44 ± 0.21 D (p < 0.01) and 0.51 ± 0.39 D (p < 0.01) in the first and second years, respectively. In the A0.01% + DFCL group, myopia progression was 0.35 ± 0.26 D and 0.44 ± 0.40 D in the first and second years, respectively (p < 0.01). Half a year after the cessation of the atropine treatment, myopia progression (rebound effect) was measured at −0.241 ± 0.35 D and −0.178 ± 0.34 D in the A0.01% and A0.01% + DFCL groups, respectively. Conclusions: Monotherapy low-dose atropine, combined with peripheral blur contact lenses, was clinically effective in decreasing myopia progression. A low rebound effect was found after the therapy cessation. In this retrospective study, combination therapy did not present an advantage over monotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36548935
pii: vision6040073
doi: 10.3390/vision6040073
pmc: PMC9781043
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):100-104
pubmed: 34860723
Eye Contact Lens. 2021 Feb 1;47(2):81-85
pubmed: 32443010
Ophthalmology. 2022 Mar;129(3):308-321
pubmed: 34627809
Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):697-708
pubmed: 26826749
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1036-42
pubmed: 26875007
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 1;12(3):875-881
pubmed: 34950014
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 May;96(5):335-344
pubmed: 31046016
Ophthalmology. 2021 Aug;128(8):1180-1187
pubmed: 33422558
Eye Contact Lens. 2020 May;46(3):129-135
pubmed: 31899695
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1152-61
pubmed: 21276616
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;81(9):653-6
pubmed: 15365383
Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Sep;100(5):432-437
pubmed: 28752898
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Apr 12;8(2):17
pubmed: 31019848
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Sep 1;63(10):10
pubmed: 36107112
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):113-124
pubmed: 30514630
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2021 Apr 21;13:129-136
pubmed: 33907484
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;65(3):315-325
pubmed: 33586090
J Optom. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):100-106
pubmed: 32896507
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;104(7):950-955
pubmed: 31653669
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 14;12(2):548-554
pubmed: 34248590
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Jun;44(6):671-678
pubmed: 30632410
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Sep;94(9):856-866
pubmed: 28737608
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):105-109
pubmed: 35192563
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021 Jul;83:100923
pubmed: 33253901
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Aug;96(8):556-567
pubmed: 31343513
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Jul;44(4):248-259
pubmed: 29923883
Eye (Lond). 2022 May;36(5):921-929
pubmed: 34645966
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May;100(3):302-311
pubmed: 34142457
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):391-399
pubmed: 26271839
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 31;14:40
pubmed: 24685184
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun;11(6):933-946
pubmed: 35800271
Ophthalmology. 2021 Feb;128(2):290-301
pubmed: 32679159
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 24;9(8):
pubmed: 32722266
Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Mar 1;99(3):204-212
pubmed: 35086120
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 13;:
pubmed: 36229177
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):478
pubmed: 33287746
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022 Jan 18;11(1):27-35
pubmed: 35044336
Eye (Lond). 2019 Jan;33(1):3-13
pubmed: 29891900
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jul 1;60(8):3091-3099
pubmed: 31323091
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Dec 03;54(13):7871-84
pubmed: 24159085
Eye (Lond). 2022 Mar 24;:
pubmed: 35322213