High capacity for a dietary specialist consumer population to cope with increasing cyanobacterial blooms.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 12 2022
22 12 2022
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
16
12
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We present a common-garden experiment to examine the amphipod Monoporeia affinis, a key deposit-feeder in the Baltic Sea, a low diversity system offering a good model for studying local adaptations. In the northern part of this system, the seasonal development of phytoplankton is characterized by a single diatom bloom (high nutritional quality), whereas in the south, the diatom bloom is followed by a cyanobacteria bloom (low nutritional quality) during summer. Therefore, the nutrient input to the benthic system differs between the sea basins. Accordingly, the amphipod populations were expected to be dietary specialists in the north and generalists in the south. We tested this hypothesis using a combination of stable isotope tracers, trophic niche analyses, and various endpoints of growth and health status. We found that when mixed with diatomes, the toxin-producing cyanobacteria, were efficiently incorporated and used for growth by both populations. However, contrary to expectations, the feeding plasticity was more pronounced in the northern population, indicating genetically-based divergence and suggesting that these animals can develop ecological adaptations to the climate-induced northward cyanobacteria expansion in this system. These findings improve our understanding regarding possible adaptations of the deposit-feeders to increasing cyanobacteria under global warming world in both limnic and marine ecosystems. It is possible that the observed effects apply to other consumers facing altered food quality due to environmental changes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36550191
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26611-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-26611-2
pmc: PMC9780316
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.xwdbrv1fc']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22169Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Ambio. 2005 Mar;34(2):145-50
pubmed: 15865312
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 29;4(3):160810
pubmed: 28405367
Ambio. 2001 Aug;30(4-5):179-83
pubmed: 11697247
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 08;9(8):e104460
pubmed: 25105967
Aquat Toxicol. 2003 Sep 10;64(4):461-76
pubmed: 12878416
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Jan;20(1):37-45
pubmed: 11351414
Ecology. 2007 Jan;88(1):42-8
pubmed: 17489452
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Feb;84(1):91-111
pubmed: 19046398
Ambio. 2015 Nov;44(7):601-11
pubmed: 25990584
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 12;11:589816
pubmed: 33510717
Environ Toxicol. 2007 Feb;22(1):101-11
pubmed: 17295266
Sci Adv. 2018 May 09;4(5):eaar8195
pubmed: 29750199
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 23;10(19):10773-10784
pubmed: 33072295
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Jun;20(6):1228-35
pubmed: 11392132
Ecology. 2010 May;91(5):1414-23
pubmed: 20503873
Aquat Toxicol. 2002 Dec 3;61(3-4):155-68
pubmed: 12359387
Ambio. 2015 Jun;44 Suppl 3:413-26
pubmed: 26022324
Ambio. 2021 Jan;50(1):203-214
pubmed: 32314265
Ambio. 2020 Feb;49(2):391-406
pubmed: 31168701
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112692
pubmed: 25409500
Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):1-28
pubmed: 12650459
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2002 Oct;53(2):305-11
pubmed: 12568468
Ambio. 2011 Mar;40(2):179-90
pubmed: 21446396
Biochem Pharmacol. 1961 Jul;7:88-95
pubmed: 13726518
Harmful Algae. 2021 Jun;106:102062
pubmed: 34154785
Toxicon. 2013 Dec 15;76:178-86
pubmed: 24018361
Harmful Algae. 2020 Jan;91:101685
pubmed: 32057344
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2018 Apr;218:23-29
pubmed: 29427614
J Anim Ecol. 2011 May;80(3):595-602
pubmed: 21401589
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 21;5(2):171398
pubmed: 29515859