Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting.
Clinical prediction model
Generalisability
Validation
Journal
Diagnostic and prognostic research
ISSN: 2397-7523
Titre abrégé: Diagn Progn Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101718985
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Dec 2022
22 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
24
08
2022
accepted:
14
11
2022
entrez:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
23
12
2022
medline:
23
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical prediction models must be appropriately validated before they can be used. While validation studies are sometimes carefully designed to match an intended population/setting of the model, it is common for validation studies to take place with arbitrary datasets, chosen for convenience rather than relevance. We call estimating how well a model performs within the intended population/setting "targeted validation". Use of this term sharpens the focus on the intended use of a model, which may increase the applicability of developed models, avoid misleading conclusions, and reduce research waste. It also exposes that external validation may not be required when the intended population for the model matches the population used to develop the model; here, a robust internal validation may be sufficient, especially if the development dataset was large.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36550534
doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00136-8
pii: 10.1186/s41512-022-00136-8
pmc: PMC9773429
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Pagination
24Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Aug;14(8):e007858
pubmed: 34340529
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):734-44; discussion 744-5
pubmed: 22378855
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;188(2):438-443
pubmed: 30299451
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58
pubmed: 33564405
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:167-76
pubmed: 26772608
Emerg Med J. 2017 Aug;34(8):517-523
pubmed: 28363994
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7
pubmed: 25981519
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441
pubmed: 32188600
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):76-86
pubmed: 18083464
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3731
pubmed: 33082154
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 1;49(4):1316-1325
pubmed: 32243524
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0237009
pubmed: 32780738
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e489-e492
pubmed: 32864600
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):808-815
pubmed: 34470057
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jul;16(1):9-13
pubmed: 10456395
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;208:106288
pubmed: 34352688
Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2567-86
pubmed: 15287085
Am Heart J. 2017 Feb;184:97-105
pubmed: 28224933
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):515-24
pubmed: 10075620
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58
pubmed: 30596875
Sports Med Open. 2020 May 27;6(1):22
pubmed: 32462372
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):3505-3522
pubmed: 28480827
BMJ. 2017 May 23;357:j2099
pubmed: 28536104
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e048008
pubmed: 34244270
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3140
pubmed: 27334381
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 15;111(6):891-7
pubmed: 23337835
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;37(6):563-568
pubmed: 35792990
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Dec;112:103611
pubmed: 33157313
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jun;43(6):1146-52
pubmed: 23152436
Stat Med. 2021 Jul 10;40(15):3533-3559
pubmed: 33948970
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;190(10):2015-2018
pubmed: 33595073
Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Dec 18;2:23
pubmed: 31093570
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1085-94
pubmed: 19208371
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328
pubmed: 32265220
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 30;3:99
pubmed: 32821854
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Dec;30(12):2545-2561
pubmed: 34623193
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):349-356
pubmed: 27565197
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):279-89
pubmed: 25179855
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:83-91
pubmed: 33836256
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 10;5(1):2
pubmed: 35013569