The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals-An Ex Vivo Study.

Er:YAG laser active irrigation filler oval root canal retreatment

Journal

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2306-5354
Titre abrégé: Bioengineering (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101676056

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 13 10 2022
revised: 27 11 2022
accepted: 13 12 2022
entrez: 23 12 2022
pubmed: 24 12 2022
medline: 24 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The removal of filling material is important for successful root canal retreatment. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two activated irrigation techniques, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) mode of the Er:YAG laser and ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) and a conventional syringe-needle technique (SNI), in the removal of bioceramic sealer/gutta-percha during conventional retreatment in oval root canals. The study sample consisted of distal root canals of 42 extracted human mandibular molars, which were prepared using a ProTaper Next system up to size 40/0.06 and filled with bioceramic sealer using a single-cone obturation technique. The teeth were then re-treated with a Reciproc Blue RB40 file and 3% sodium hypochlorite solution. The prepared teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 14 per group) and subjected to one of the three irrigation methods. Micro-CT scans were performed at different stages to assess the amount of filling material after each retreatment phase. The results of the study showed that all the tested irrigation techniques reduced a statistically significant amount of the remnant filling material at retreatment (p < 0.05), and there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the three methods. All tested techniques had similar efficacy in the removal of the remaining filling remnants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36551026
pii: bioengineering9120820
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120820
pmc: PMC9774814
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 22;21(1):81
pubmed: 33618701
Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9753210
pubmed: 27242904
Photomed Laser Surg. 2016 Jan;34(1):3-10
pubmed: 26682489
Dent Mater J. 2014;33(6):786-91
pubmed: 25311342
J Endod. 2020 Jun;46(6):858-862
pubmed: 32354428
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Apr;26(4):3515-3521
pubmed: 34854988
J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):1002-7
pubmed: 21689560
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102631
pubmed: 34798349
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Dec;36:102535
pubmed: 34536606
J Endod. 2010 Dec;36(12):2000-2
pubmed: 21092821
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2235-2240
pubmed: 26820291
Int Endod J. 2020 Apr;53(4):529-538
pubmed: 31710382
Aust Endod J. 2022 Oct 25;:
pubmed: 36282012
Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Sep;53(7):998-1004
pubmed: 33259683
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;14(24):
pubmed: 34947188
Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Apr 26;44(2):e18
pubmed: 31149616
Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):143-149
pubmed: 35786578
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971 Aug;32(2):271-5
pubmed: 5284110
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 May;18(4):1147-1153
pubmed: 23959377
Int Endod J. 2014 Nov;47(11):1078-83
pubmed: 24456216
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Dec;40:103130
pubmed: 36162755
Aust Endod J. 2022 Jul 4;:
pubmed: 35789065
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102707
pubmed: 34971819
Int Endod J. 2022 Jun 28;:
pubmed: 35762859
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 May;33(4):823-833
pubmed: 29327088
J Endod. 2019 Aug;45(8):1036-1040
pubmed: 31230709
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Dec;32(9):2055-2062
pubmed: 28929249
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2022 Aug;40(8):565-572
pubmed: 35917520
Aust Endod J. 2022 Dec;48(3):415-422
pubmed: 34928535
Int Endod J. 2020 Jul;53(7):962-973
pubmed: 32159859
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 22;21(1):275
pubmed: 34022868
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6773-6781
pubmed: 35879623
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2077-80
pubmed: 25442728
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55 Suppl 4:845-871
pubmed: 35426157
Int Endod J. 2019 Jun;52(6):899-907
pubmed: 30663790
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):421-434
pubmed: 35399761
J Endod. 2016 May;42(5):793-7
pubmed: 26987688
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;25(4):385-391
pubmed: 36187862

Auteurs

Gabrijela Kapetanović Petričević (G)

Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dental Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Marko Katić (M)

Department of Materials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Valentina Brzović Rajić (V)

Department of Dental Diseases, Dentistry Clinic, University Hospital Centre, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Ivica Anić (I)

Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dental Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Ivona Bago (I)

Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dental Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Classifications MeSH